HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 9:07 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079


Station 65
Architect: LPA Sacramento Inc.
Developer: Lucas Enterprises

This proposed mixed-use, transit oriented project consists of 49,805 sf of
commercial retail, 82,695sf for a hotel with 148 rooms, 13,875sf of
restaurants, 30,000sf for a fitness center, 52,290sf of office and medical
office, 210,635sf for a parking structure, and 100 residential units.

The site is located on the southeast corner of 65th Street and Folsom
Boulevard. It is adjacent to the 65th Street Light Rail Station and close to
the major freeway ramp of Interstate 50 as well as within walking distance
to the California State University, Sacramento campus. With F65 just across
the street with a similar layout of retail and residential, I'm sure this will fit
into the neighborhood just fine.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 9:16 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079
double post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 10:03 PM
ozone's Avatar
ozone ozone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,270
Cool 65th Street project! I assume it's going to be on part of what is now a large parking lot and warehouse of some long defunct business. But isn't there a fairly new retail center on that site as well? I also would like to see a movie theater be built there but I know the Tower Mafia would put a hit out on any such proposal. And I wonder when the empty weed lot across Q Street, next to the freeway that's had a "future office building" sign up for 10 years, is going to be developed? Now lets hope the proposed BRT tram linking CSUS to the 65th Street Village get built.



As for the Thunder Valley Casino:
I saw lot of unfinished highrises when I lived in Asia -like rotting metal carcasses abandoned after the Japanese meltdown. So I imagine it will happen here as well. I just don't understand why the casino needs lenders. Can't they bankroll the construction themselves?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 10:20 PM
Majin's Avatar
Majin Majin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Downtown Sacramento
Posts: 2,221
Intertstate 50 eh?
__________________
Majin Crew: jsf8278, wburg, daverave
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 11:26 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,402
ozone: the 65th Street project is on the corner, where there is currently a strip mall and a transfer point for RT buses, not a parking lot. No warehouses to speak of. It looks like they are keeping the bus transfer point, but some of the bus stuff is going a block or two to the east.

Casinos are not banks, so no, they can't necessarily self-finance
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2008, 4:10 AM
ozone's Avatar
ozone ozone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,270
Huh? Self-financing? Isn't that like paying cash? I don't get what you are saying?

As for 65th. The rendering has the RT station right next to this project. I'm going to check this out tomorrow but I could have sworn that there is an old warehouse/showroom structure next to the bus transfer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2008, 5:31 AM
Phillip Phillip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 562
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozone View Post
I'm going to check this out tomorrow but I could have sworn that there is an old warehouse/showroom structure next to the bus transfer.
Are you talking about the warehouse building that used to be Office Depot, before OD moved across 65th into the new shopping center?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2008, 3:38 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,402
There's a big warehouse/showroom thing to the east, along with a bunch of other businesses. The big lot is not for parking cars, it's a turnaround/transfer point for a lot of buses. I thought it was a parking lot too until I started going by there regularly on my way to school, buses use it but cars don't.

Self-financing can mean paying cash, but it can also mean putting up one's existing assets as collateral for a loan. Casinos have money, but they don't necessarily have that kind of money on hand at a particular time. So no, they wouldn't necessarily have enough free capital to self-finance the project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2008, 12:21 AM
econgrad econgrad is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 795
Friday, November 28, 2008
Rancho Cordova considers building conference center
Sacramento Business Journal - by Mark Anderson Staff writer

Building a conference center could boost business and help fill hotel rooms in Rancho Cordova, a high-priced but potentially money-making plan the still-developing city is reviewing.

City leaders say a conference center on Folsom Boulevard could address the demand for meeting space while bringing more guests to the six hotels with a combined 1,000 rooms just off Highway 50 and Sunrise Boulevard.

“We have the job base and the hotel base already here — we have to consider the need for meeting space,” said Micah Runner, Rancho Cordova economic development manager.

Two of the hotels have significant meeting space: the Sacramento Marriott Rancho Cordova with a 4,000-square-foot ballroom and the Holiday Inn Rancho Cordova Hotel, which has 2,700 square feet of meeting space.

Longtime hotelier Ron Pitamber also has received permits for two hotels, including a 217-room Embassy Suites with some conference space.

But a big conference center could create more demand for the hotels on Sunrise Boulevard. One possible site is next to Pitamber’s project on Folsom Boulevard, where a mini-storage facility exists now.

The budget-conscious city is conducting a limited study of available meeting space in the region and similar-sized cities with conference centers before deciding on the proposal.

“We want to see if this is a step we should take or something we should plan for later,” Runner said.

And as the city considers its options, a private developer is completing a conference and events center near the major hotels.

The Sunrise Event Center is at 11167 Trade Center Drive. Three main banquet areas can be combined to make an 8,600-square-foot ballroom, or split by soundproof walls into smaller spaces.

The center will open in January, said Rhana Dahduli, manager of the business. The center is in part of an office and warehouse building her father owns. It had been used as a computer warehouse and later as office space.

“I was just looking at the space and I realized we could really do something with it,” said Dahduli, who has already booked business meetings, conferences, receptions and weddings in the building. “So far, it is just word of mouth. There is a huge need for meeting space.”

Dahduli is working with local hotels to establish group room rates for conferences.

“It looks pretty nice,” said Hamid Kazemi, general manager of the Holiday Inn Rancho Cordova, which Pitamber owns. “They are going to get a lot of business.”

But there likely will be a need for more meeting space in Rancho Cordova, Kazemi said. The city has more office space than downtown Sacramento, which has a 251,000-square-foot convention center as well as many private meeting and conference spaces.

Pitamber plans to begin construction this spring on the Embassy Suites and a 113-room Candlewood Suites, Kazemi said.

“The economy is going to be declining in 2009, but we won’t be open until 2010,” Kazemi said. “Building during a downturn, the cost of construction is less, and by the time 2010 rolls around, there will be more demand.”

In addition, the Embassy Suites and the Candlewood brands have loyal customers who seek those hotels, he said.

There have been some dire predictions about the Sacramento-area hotel market being slightly overbuilt in recent years, especially with a decreasing demand for hotel rooms. But Kazemi said those predictions are based on areas such as downtown or Roseville. A new hotel has not opened in Rancho Cordova in eight years, and most of the hotels are at least 20 years old.

For years, downtown Sacramento hoteliers wanted a larger convention center to bring more business to downtown Sacramento, which led to the expansion of the convention center in 1994. The expansion eventually led to the city seeking a developer to build the Sheraton Grand Sacramento Hotel in 2000. The Sheraton has conference space, including a 10,280-square-foot room.

“There always seems to be a question of whether you need more hotels or a larger center,” said Mike Testa, spokesman with the Sacramento Convention & Visitors Bureau. “One doesn’t go without the other. They feed off each other.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2008, 7:04 AM
TWAK's Avatar
TWAK TWAK is offline
Resu Deretsiger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lake County, CA
Posts: 15,057
nevermind, I was thinking that this was going to go in that empty field south of Q street, but this thing is going to take place of that shopping center with the subway. I wonder what they are gonna do with that open field
__________________
#RuralUrbanist
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2008, 7:26 PM
daverave daverave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
I find it ironic that this discussion regarding the Station 65 project is found in the "Suburban Development" thread. You mid-town/downtown types are so provincial.

I like a lot of the aspects of this URBAN project. It seems like a logical place for this kind of density and it doesn't involve tearing down any heritage buildings or neighborhood fabric. It's very mixed use. That being said, the traffic problems at that intersection are already infamous. It is solid gridlock many afternoons. The construction, trips generated by this development and the hotel drop-off lane will not help. Eventually they will need to separate the vehicular traffic and the light rail somehow I would think. Alternatively, people will need to start leaving their cars at home more often.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 10:17 PM
econgrad econgrad is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 795
New York will ring in new year with LED lights from Rancho Cordova
By Bob Shallit
bshallit@sacbee.com
Published: Tuesday, Dec. 23, 2008 | Page 1B

You might say Rancho Cordova is the LED-er when it comes to eye-popping lighting displays.

The area is a design and production center for at least six top makers of giant illuminated signage using light-emitting diodes (LEDs) – including those in next week's New Year's Eve ball drops in Times Square and the first-ever in downtown Sacramento.

"Let's be clear about it," says Kevin Furry, co-founder of LED Effects, a pioneering LED firm that was acquired last year by Lighting Science Group of New York. "A lot of what you see ... in Times Square comes from Rancho Cordova."

Lighting Science's Rancho operation helped make the multicolored, LED-encrusted Waterford crystal ball that will be lowered to usher in the Big Apple's New Year. The 12,000-pound sphere is 12 feet in diameter – twice as big as last year's.

For Sacramento's inaugural ball drop, to be held at the corner of 10th and K streets downtown, Lighting Science is making a much smaller "ball." (Actually it's a cube but let's not have any jokes about "square" Sacramento.)

Ball or cube, "it will be something wonderful," Furry says.

A large "2009" LED sign for the Sacramento event is being fabricated by Avenue Illumination, another Rancho company with a prominent presence in the Big Apple.

A third firm, D3 LED, isn't involved in the downtown celebration, but its giant ads dominate Times Square. Other local LED leaders are Lighthouse Technologies Ltd. and MultiMedia LED. A Belgium-based display firm, Barco, has its North American service center here.

How did they all end up in Rancho Cordova? Furry says LED Effects got things started 11 years ago.

Others followed, he says, drawn by the concentration of engineers with LED expertise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 10:22 PM
econgrad econgrad is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 795
GenCorp's Glenborough at Easton and Easton Place Project Achieves Important Milestones
Sacramento County Board of Supervisors unanimously certifies the Final Environmental Impact Report and approves General Plan Amendments.

GenCorp's Glenborough at Easton and Easton Place Project Achieves Important Milestones

SACRAMENTO, Calif., Dec. 22 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- GenCorp Inc. (NYSE: GY) announced today that the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors has unanimously approved the Final Environmental Impact Report and amendments to Sacramento County's General Plan for the Glenborough at Easton and Easton Place project. The actions occurred at the Board of Supervisors' December 10 and December 17, 2008 meetings. Located on approximately 1,400 acres in eastern Sacramento County, the project is located between Hazel Avenue and Prairie City Road south of Highway 50.

"We are pleased to have achieved these strategic real estate milestones," said Scott Neish, interim president and chief executive officer of GenCorp. "Our real estate team has done a great job moving the project through a complex regulatory process."

The Board of Supervisors also unanimously voted for an intent motion to approve the balance of the project's requested zoning amendments and map conditions, which are expected to be ratified at the Board's January 28, 2009 meeting.

"In 2004, GenCorp and the County initiated a collaborative planning process that represents a new model in land use planning in Sacramento County," said David C. Hatch, vice president, GenCorp Realty Investments, LLC. "We are very proud of this achievement. The Board of Supervisors' unanimous votes are a testament to the quality of the project and the success of the process."

Grounded in principles for smart growth and sustainability, the project's land use plan includes 4,883 units in a wide range of residential densities and 4.2 million feet of commercial and office space. The project also includes more than 480 acres of open space and parks, and an extensive network of biking and walking trails that link it to the American River Parkway and the Hazel Light Rail station.

"We have taken great care to design a project that will capitalize on the unique opportunities presented by the land and enhance the Alder Creek open space area that has been inaccessible to the public for more than 50 years," said Hatch.

Surrounding the Light Rail station at Hazel Avenue, Easton Place will be a major transit-oriented development, encompassing high-density, mixed-used areas featuring residential, employment, retail and entertainment opportunities, as well as civic and public spaces.

The approximately 6,000-acre Easton master plan is comprised of a series of smaller planning areas known as "boroughs." In addition to Glenborough at Easton and Easton Place, the boroughs of Easton include Rio del Oro and Westborough located in the City of Rancho Cordova, California, as well as Hillsborough located in the Folsom, California Sphere of Influence.

Forward Looking Statements

This release may contain certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, relating to the timing and planning of the Company's real estate projects. Such statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to risks, uncertainty and changes in circumstances. A variety of factors could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expected and expressed in the Company's forward-looking statements. Some important risk factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ from those expressed in the forward-looking statements are described in the section "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007.

About GenCorp

GenCorp is a leading technology-based manufacturer of aerospace and defense products and systems with a real estate segment that includes activities related to the entitlement, sale and leasing of the Company's excess real estate assets. Additional information about the Company can be obtained at the Company's web sites at http://www.GenCorp.com, http://www.Aerojet.com, and http://www.Easton-ca.com
Website: http://www.gencorp.com//
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2008, 5:52 AM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 8,064
Isn't the groudwater pollution worse from Aerojet than in the railyards? And who wants to live on dredge tailings anyways.
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2009, 6:12 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079
Maybe Thunder Valley can get bailed-out by the Feds to finish the expansion.



Casino construction halts; Thunder Valley mulls total expansion

By Bob Walter bwalter@sacbee.com
Thursday, Jan. 08, 2009

The once-bustling construction site next to Thunder Valley casino looks like a high-rise ghost town, with pillars and rebar and empty cranes that disappeared into the fog Wednesday. And no workers.

It feels like Placer County's version of the half-built Elk Grove Promenade mall – only taller. Both projects were halted midstream by the lagging economy.

Work on the casino expansion stopped last month, idling 350 people employed by Thunder Valley contractors and subcontractors.

But construction is expected to begin again by late spring or early summer, said Doug Elmets, spokesman for the United Auburn Indian Community, which owns and operates the casino.

The goal is to complete construction by 2010 as scheduled when ground was broken for the project in July, Elmets said.

The question that remains is how big the expansion will ultimately be.

The original plan, estimated to cost $1 billion, called for a 23-story hotel with 624 rooms, a nine-story parking garage with 5,000 spaces, performing arts center and more.

"Like most businesses, we are trying to gauge future market demand," Elmets said. "There is no question that Placer County and the region need a large hotel and the casino needs more parking. But will we need nine stories of parking or as many suites as we planned?

"The tribe … decided to step back and reassess and at this stage of the development of the project, they were able to do just that."

Elmets said last month's opening of the $530 million Red Hawk Casino, on Highway 50 in Shingle Springs, had no bearing on the Thunder Valley decision to proceed with the expansion.

"The reality is there are 5 million people within a 100-mile radius of both Thunder Valley and Red Hawk," he said. "The number of people visiting Thunder Valley continues to grow, especially during the holiday season, but in this economy, people are just not spending as much."

Elmets would not discuss the casino's revenue, but gaming analysts have estimated Thunder Valley's annual profits to be between $400 million and $500 million. Some analysts says Thunder Valley is among a handful of the most profitable casinos, Indian or otherwise, in the country.

Representatives of Red Hawk, owned by the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, would not discuss the new casino's revenue projections.

But Bill Eadington, of the Institute for the Study of Gambling & Commercial Gaming at the University of Nevada, said in November that Red Hawk could generate $250 million a year, "even in a recession."

http://www.sacbee.com/ourregion/story/1524848.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2009, 10:24 PM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 8,064
City set to approve big development in south Sacramento

By Mary Lynne Vellinga
mlvellinga@sacbee.com

Published: Saturday, Jan. 10, 2009 | Page 6B


The city of Sacramento is poised to approve a huge new shopping center just a few miles from the Elk Grove shopping center where construction has stalled.

City Council members are scheduled to vote Tuesday on Delta Shores, a new community with about 5,000 housing units and 1.3 million square feet of retail – the equivalent of an Arden Fair mall.

The retailers would not be housed under one roof, but instead would be grouped together in trendy "lifestyle center" fashion, similar to the new Natomas Promenade in North Natomas. The center would include a multiplex cinema.

While the retail economy is in a deep trough now, city planners say they're confident that San Diego developer M&H Realty Partners will proceed with construction on the 782-acre site as early as next year.

Delta Shores straddles Interstate 5 next to the Meadowview neighborhood. It is one of the last remaining large swaths of undeveloped land in the city.

"We think it's going to be successful," said planning manager David Kwong. "We don't really have anything like this on the south side of the city. The closest thing similar to this would be in Natomas."

A new shopping mall could deliver millions in sales tax dollars to the city – a potential savior in bad budget times.

But at least one retail expert suggested the city could be making a mistake. "If they were starting to build it today, it would be foolhardy, and in 2010 it could be foolhardy," said George Whalin, head of Retail Management Consultants in San Marcos.

"I don't know anybody who is looking to build anything new," Whalin added. "The mall guys, the shopping center guys, all the discussions now are how do we pull back, how do we stop projects that are on the drawing boards."

M&H officials could not be reached for comment Friday.

The city is depending on M&H to foot nearly half of the estimated $100 million bill for a new freeway interchange on I-5 and extend Cosumnes Boulevard as a six-lane connector between Highway 99 and I-5.

Sacramento principal planner Greg Bitter said M&H has pledged to advance much of the money for the city's share of the cost, so construction on the roadway improvements could be completed as early as the winter of 2010.

Bitter said M&H has told the city it hopes to open the first stores at the same time.

M&H, also known as Merlone Geier Partners, is the same company developing 158 acres around the stalled Elk Grove Promenade at Grant Line Road and Highway 99.

M&H has proceeded with its plans even as General Growth Properties, builder of the central mall, has postponed construction amid the worsening economy and its own financial difficulties. But M&H hasn't actually built anything yet, said Elk Grove spokeswoman Christine Brainerd.

Sacramento city planning staff members have been working on the latest plan for Delta Shores for more than two years. Various plans for the property have come and gone during the half-century that it has been part of the city of Sacramento.

Kwong, the city planner, said his department is satisfied with the current design, which includes low-, medium- and high-density housing along with the retail.

"We've learned a lot from the things we've done in Natomas," Kwong said. "It has a good mix of uses, a good mix of densities, and they're well spread throughout the community. … It's going to provide a lot of jobs to the neighborhood there."

He and Bitter said they expect the retail to come before the housing, given the state of the housing market.

SunCal, the residential developer that had been working with M&H on the project, left the team about a year ago, and another residential partner has yet to be identified.

In recent days, city staff members have been working with M&H on revisions, trying to satisfy critics including the state Department of Fish and Game and Friends of the Swainson's Hawk, an environmental group that has challenged development projects.

M&H has agreed to acquire land within 10 miles of Delta Shores to satisfy requirements that it mitigate for loss of Swainson's hawk habitat, Bitter said.

"Up until last night at 6:30 the language was going back and forth," Bitter said. "It's our job to give the council something that we feel is defensible."

http://sacbee.com/topstories/story/1530932.html?




And the site plan from the developers website.
http://www.merlonegeier.com/pdfs/DeltaShores.pdf
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2009, 5:53 PM
Surefiresacto's Avatar
Surefiresacto Surefiresacto is offline
thenorth.bandcamp.com
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orangevale
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltsmotorsport View Post
"We think it's going to be successful," said planning manager David Kwong. "We don't really have anything like this on the south side of the city. The closest thing similar to this would be in Natomas."
Wow... Urban sprawl based on Natomas. This is going to be awesome...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2009, 7:33 PM
LandofFrost's Avatar
LandofFrost LandofFrost is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 195
Man, i hate it when cities just run into each other like this. Can't we get a freaking greenbelt so that you can actually tell you are entering or leaving Sac.....actually I'm sure someone would have had to have done this four decades ago.. oh well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2009, 8:05 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,402
Four decades ago, we assumed that gas would always be cheap and plentiful, the freeways would never get crowded, the single-family home with a big yard was the perfect living environment for everyone (everyone who was white, anyhow) and that we'd never, ever run out of land.

And, because of the way cities work (which I have remarked on before, called the "Growth Machine" thesis,) cities have to either keep expanding or raise taxes to maintain their services. The folks who get city council members and mayors elected (developers) always favor expansion, especially of the suburban kind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2009, 10:13 PM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 8,064
At least all these higher density units will be fairly close to LRT.
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:08 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.