HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Business, the Economy & Politics


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2009, 5:25 PM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
Developer faces felony charges

Campaign finance - Portland's Thomas P. Moyer allegedly gave illegal contributions
Thursday, January 08, 2009
BRYAN DENSON
The Oregonian Staff
The Oregon Court of Appeals on Wednesday reinstated the criminal case against a prominent Portland developer accused of making illegal contributions in a mayoral race.

The panel, voting 6-4, found that the state Department of Justice could move forward with felony charges against Thomas P. Moyer, the multimillionaire developer of the Fox Tower.

Moyer was accused of funneling $4,500 in campaign contributions to Portland mayoral candidate Jim Francesconi in 2003 under the names of his executive assistant and a granddaughter. No evidence suggests Francesconi knew about the donations.

Moyer and the two women -- Sonja R. Tune and Vanessa C. Kassab -- were charged in September 2004 with making contributions under a false name, a rarely prosecuted class C felony.

A Multnomah County judge threw out the charges after Moyer and his co-defendants argued that the state's campaign finance reporting requirements violated their rights of free speech and political association.

The charges against Moyer, a self-made businessman born in 1919 to a Sellwood family with little money, carry penalties of up to five years in prison and a $125,000 fine. But convictions for crimes of that nature normally result in smaller fines and either community service or a much shorter jail sentence.

Secretary of State Kate Brown and Attorney General John R. Kroger applauded Wednesday's decision, saying campaign finance laws should be transparent to preserve the integrity of the elections system.

Janet Hoffman, an attorney who helped argue the case for the defendants, said they expect to file a petition to the Oregon Supreme Court for review.

"We're confident in the ultimate outcome of the case," Hoffman said. "We believe that the trial court's opinion was correct and that it will be reinstated."


http://www.oregonlive.com/business/o...300.xml&coll=7
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2009, 4:04 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
I hope this doesn't affect PAW development. I know that hole is already worth millions, but if I was totally petty, I'd abandon the project and leave the state with a s*itty construction site in the middle of its biggest city.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2009, 5:13 AM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2009, 6:50 AM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
Tom's not going anywhere. He has attorneys who will get him a slap on the wrist and a small fine. He sure as hell can't skip town, he has too many assets here. And there are contracts in place for PAW. Construction will continue regardless of the outcome of this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Business, the Economy & Politics
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.