HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Business, the Economy & Politics


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2007, 5:18 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
Commercial construction expected to remain strong

Commercial work not in danger of recession – report
Daily Journal of Commerce
POSTED: 06:00 AM PST Thursday, December 6, 2007
BY DJC STAFF

Commercial builders shouldn’t fear a recession in 2008, a report issued Wednesday said.

The report by FMI Research Services Group said nonresidential construction will increase in 2008, but at a slower rate than in 2007. Commercial building will expand at a 5 percent rate in 2008 and at a 4 percent rate in 2009, the report said, as demand lowers for certain nonresidential segments.

Nonresidential construction isn’t expected to recover until 2009, the report said. Put-in-place construction will see a smaller decline than housing starts due to rising labor and materials costs, upgrades and the use of higher-end materials, according to the report.

Despite declines in residential and single-family construction, each sector will remain at a high level, the report said.
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...ession--report
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2007, 3:27 AM
Snowden352's Avatar
Snowden352 Snowden352 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 236
Oregon's Economy

[there isn't a thread for Oregon's economy in here, so I thought I'd start one.]


About that recession? It's avoidable, it seems
New and more complete figures of jobs and manufacturing paint a far more optimistic picture of Oregon's economy than projected last week
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
RICHARD READ
The Oregonian

Last week, an Oregon economist said recession appeared imminent. This week, state economists said Oregon is adding jobs, manufacturing is up and a recession seems avoidable.

Oh, and by the way, that October decline in the state's payroll employment they told us about? Never happened. Actually, October's seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment increased.

Plus, November's gain of 7,500 jobs, on a seasonally adjusted basis, was the biggest since December 2005, state labor economists said in a monthly report issued Monday. For the past 12 months, employment in Oregon also has increased 1.4 percent, compared with the nation's 1.1 percent.

"It really changes our view," said David Cooke, an Oregon Employment Department economist. The October-November growth, he said, "indicates that there's been substantial economic strength in those two months in Oregon's economy."

So is recession heading our way, or not? And why can't economists get their numbers straight and agree?

Timothy Duy, the University of Oregon economist who issued last week's recession warning, said the contrasting views result from a state economy that hangs in the balance -- with seasonally adjusted unemployment flat at 5.5 percent in November.

"We're at this inflection point," Duy said. "Maybe in fact we're going to pull out of this soft patch without any problem."

Economists weigh clues differently to make judgments. Whereas the labor economists look back in time, Duy uses an index of indicators to see ahead.

But even forecasters disagree.

Dae Baek, Oregon's acting state economist, sees a more positive picture in the data he uses. Despite recent gloomy headlines, he said, the new numbers confirm that the state is on track for some growth in 2008. October's faulty numbers stemmed from the Employment Department having to submit figures to federal officials before all monthly government-hiring results came in.

"Our economy is fundamentally sound," Baek said. "Consumers in Oregon are alive and well. Manufacturing actually has stabilized, I think in large part due to strong demand from the global economy."

One way of testing these theories is to visit a factory floor at, say, Climax Portable Machine Tools Inc., which makes lathes, hydraulic drills, flange facers and other gear in Newberg. There, Geoff Gilmore, president and chief executive, can't hire machinists fast enough -- for as much as $60,000 a year, plus benefits and overtime -- to fill orders.

"I know our company is not going into recession," Gilmore said. "We have a backlog like you wouldn't believe."

Privately held Climax, with sales from $25 million to $35 million a year, has hired more than 50 people since June 2006, said Joni George, chief cultural officer. With 138 employees, the company has 25 openings for positions ranging from high-school work study to senior machinists.

"If you'd told me five years ago that I'd be hiring machinists from the state of Wyoming and relocating them here," Gilmore said, "that's unbelievable."

One big driver for Climax is exports, which have grown from 10 percent of the company's sales eight years ago to 30 percent today. Gilmore expects foreign sales to near 50 percent in two years as Germany, China and South Korea snap up portable machine tools.

Statewide, booming exports have helped propel a rebound in manufacturing employment, which surged by 3,200 jobs between June and November to reach 203,800 on a seasonally adjusted basis. The weak dollar helps Oregon's sales abroad by reducing prices of U.S. goods in foreign currencies.

Other sectors also gained in November. Trade, transportation and utilities added 7,700 jobs when a gain of 5,000 is the seasonal pattern. Government hiring increased, as did educational and health services.

With November's jump of 7,500 jobs on a seasonally adjusted basis, payroll employment reached 1,737,900. Instead of dropping by 1,400 in October as originally reported, employment gained 3,200 that month. The main reasons were upward revisions of 2,200 jobs in local government education and 1,000 in state government.

Construction lost jobs but remained above the seasonally adjusted 100,000 that it hasn't undershot since early 2006. In November, 102,379 Oregonians were unemployed, compared with 99,001 in November last year.

"The moderately strong job showing in October, followed by the strong gain in November, put Oregon's payroll employment up by 24,300 over the past 12 months," said Monday's Employment Department report. "This is a gain of 1.4 percent."

Baek, the acting state economist, acknowledged economic damage from the national housing crisis and overall slower growth. "But," he said, "let's stop downtalking our economy."

Richard Read: 503-294-5135; richread@aol.com
__________________
"Δεν ελπίζω τίποτε. Δεν φοβούμαι τίποτε. Είμαι λεύτερος"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2007, 4:37 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517

Portland-based company designs Abu Dhabi hotel

Daily Journal of Commerce
POSTED: 06:00 AM PST Thursday, December 20, 2007
BY DJC STAFF

Abu Dhabi’s Tourism Development and Investment Co. has picked Lake Oswego-based architectural firm Otak to lead the design-build process for the $1.6 billion Al Bateen Wharf Hotel in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Otak will act as lead architect on the project and work in collaboration with Abu Dhabi-based Belbadi Enterprises. The two firms worked together on Vancouvercenter in Southwest Washington.

Otak will be responsible for all design services, including architecture, structural and civil engineering, landscape architecture and design coordination.

The 177,000-square-foot hotel will include green elements such as solar-screens, fritted glass with integrated solar cells and an ecoroof.

Two towers will make up the hotel, a 15-story, 400-room hotel tower and a 14-story, 200-unit apartment tower. The project will also include a business and conference facility, a public marina, a waterfront market, underground parking and animated fountains, as well as retail and restaurant space.

The hotel is expected to be complete by late 2009.
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...bu-Dhabi-hotel
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2007, 7:34 PM
cab cab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,450
Its funny even in tower rich Abu Dhabi the Portland firm has designed two very ugly long slab buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 11:07 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
Oregon remains popular
Portland Business Journal

More people are moving into Oregon than moving out.

That is according to a study by Atlas Van Lines Inc. of Evansville, Ind., which found that Oregon recorded 1,239 inbound moves in 2006, compared with 721 outbound moves. That continues a trend since 1997.

In comparison, the Rust Belt states of Michigan, Indiana and Ohio experienced more departures (more than 55 percent of all moves) than households moving in.

Oregon's neighbors, Washington and Idaho, were two of the more popular destination states, with more than 55 percent of those states' moves into the state. Washington recorded 2,336 inbound moves and 2,170 outbound moves, according to Atlas.
http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/...ml?t=printable
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 3:27 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
^ at that rate it will take Oregon about 2,000 years to increase its population by 1 million.

oh wait, its just one moving company.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 6:50 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
^I did that when I first read the article. I was like, only 1200 in-bound moves, what the hell...
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 10:40 PM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 487
Actually, Oregon seems to be more popular according to those stats with a greater net gain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 10:54 PM
downtownpdx's Avatar
downtownpdx downtownpdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,696
^^ Right, these stats say that Oregon had a net gain of around 500 moves, while Wash. had around 170.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2008, 3:55 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
I think the net moves for the metro area are closer to 50,000 annually.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2008, 5:45 AM
Dr Nevergold Dr Nevergold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 20,104
I added +1 to the Oregon growth in August 2007.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2008, 6:53 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
^^^YeAh!!!! I hope you don't regret it...been a wet fall and winter!
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2008, 7:34 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,367
I'll be adding +3 to the Oregon growth in August 2008.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2008, 8:39 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
New fee would repave Portland
Projects - A tax for households and businesses is proposed to upgrade major streets and improve safety
Thursday, January 10, 2008
JAMES MAYER
The Oregonian

Just about everybody who uses Portland streets will notice a change -- safer intersections, new bike boulevards, better traffic signals and fewer potholes -- but city residents and businesses will pay a premium for it.

A new tax headed for city approval will raise $464 million over 15 years for street safety and maintenance projects.

Here's some of what it would buy:

Most of the money, about $340 million, would go for pavement, fixing every major street in Portland.

Commissioner Sam Adams, who developed the plan with the help of an 89-member stakeholder committee, said money for street maintenance has steadily eroded since the state gas tax was last increased in 1993.

The new fee -- if approved by the City Council next week and if it survives a potential referral to voters by opponents -- would also pay for improvements to nearly 30 high-crash intersections, installation of 20 miles of sidewalks and 50 pedestrian islands, creation of 114 miles of walking and biking boulevards, and synchronizing of traffic signals on 26 corridors.

The fee would also allow police traffic enforcement on freeways within the city, which currently aren't patrolled.

Under Adams' proposal, households would pay $4.54 a month, added to their water and sewer bills. Businesses would pay a fee based on the amount of traffic they generate. Officials estimate that most businesses would pay an average of $33 a month, but large companies could pay much more.

As Adams has pushed the street fee, Multnomah County Chairman Ted Wheeler has been working on a county vehicle registration fee that would raise about $164 million over 15 years for county bridges, mostly for the local share of fixing or replacing the Sellwood Bridge, the county's top transportation priority. The proposal isn't ready for county board action yet.

Most people who spoke during a three-hour hearing Wednesday supported the plan.

Dr. Susan Kubota offered emotional testimony about the death this past fall of her niece, 19-year-old cyclist Tracey Sparling, who was crushed by a cement truck on West Burnside Street.

"She was ripped from her family and this world just because she opted to ride her bike instead of driving a car," Kubota said.

Police Chief Rosie Sizer noted the "pathos and the economics" of crashes: In the past decade, 378 people have been killed and 2,600 people seriously injured on city streets, with an estimated cost of $412 million.

Many business interests told City Council members that they supported the fee.

"It's not often that the alliance, or any business organization, backs a fee increase," said Sandra McDonough, president of the Portland Business Alliance, the city's major business lobbying group. "We do not do so lightly in this instance, either."

McDonough said the business community understands the impact of bad roads and congestion, particularly on the movement of freight.

But some business owners don't like the idea. Kathy Leathers from Leathers Fuel said the fee gives service stations just outside the city an unfair competitive advantage. She'll either have to pass the fee on to her customers or absorb the cost.

Paul Romain, lobbyist for the Oregon Petroleum Association, said his group would support an increase in the state's 24-cents-per-gallon gas tax but not the city's new street fee. Romain said the city wouldn't be in so much trouble if it had spent its money wisely over the past 15 years.

"You have a $34 million surplus right now. Why aren't you talking about that for road maintenance?" he asked.

Romain said his group would decide after the council vote next week whether to seek the 18,000 signatures needed to put the fee ordinance on the May ballot.

Kevin Spellman served on a committee that reviewed the city's transportation finances to verify the accuracy of the dire road picture presented by Adams and other officials.

"We looked behind the curtain to see if we were being told the facts. Sadly, we were," Spellman said. "The backlog is real. The backlog is growing."

James Mayer: 503-294-5988; jimmayer@news.oregonian.com
http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/o...360.xml&coll=7
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2008, 6:45 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
For Portland’s big builders, gravy train is a school bus
As condo work slows, Portland’s largest commercial contractors hop on to K-12 school construction with voters passing a record $1.3 billion in bonds
Daily Journal of Commerce
POSTED: 06:00 AM PST Tuesday, January 15, 2008
BY LIBBY TUCKER

Public school construction is the hottest new market for commercial builders in 2008, Portland’s largest contractors say.

Little more than a year after Oregon voters passed a record $1.3 billion worth of bonds, school districts have had time to review project plans and buy land. And the building frenzy is about to begin.

The size of the contracts and volume of work are so big, Portland contractors that normally wouldn’t sneeze at school projects are now vying for their chunk of the bond dollars. As the housing market dries up and a credit crunch makes office and retail projects harder to pencil out, companies that for the past few years were busy building office towers and condos now see K-12 construction as an opportunity.

“It represents a very important part of construction work over the next couple of years,” Matthew Braun, a project manager for Howard S. Wright, said. “This is ... a new market for us.”

The 2007 Legislature also granted school districts permission to adopt a host of new construction excise taxes for capital projects. Portland Public Schools and the Parkrose, Riverdale, Beaverton and David Douglas school districts have all adopted fees of up to $1 per square foot, effective this month.

Combined, bond measures and tax proceeds have created a sizeable list of school projects extending into 2010. North Clackamas, Beaverton, Medford, Hillsboro, Bend-LaPine and Sherwood school districts lead the pack, accounting for 75 percent of bond dollars issued in 2006.

And school work isn’t about to dry up soon. For the 18 measures that passed in 2006, measures in 23 other districts failed, signaling a large, unmet need for more space and improvements statewide.

North Clackamas, Beaverton biggest builders

Voters in 12 counties passed bond measures in the November 2006 election, racking up more than a billion dollars for K-12 school construction, renovation and maintenance in 18 school districts. And Reedsport School District passed a $10.3 million bond measure last November.

School districts last summer broke ground on some of the first projects paid for by 2006 bond measures. But a large chunk of the work will start this year, with the next round of new school projects starting as early as March.

North Clackamas School District holds the biggest of the 2006 bond measures, with $229.6 million of work over the next three years. With so much work to do, the district jumped to line up contractors for its construction management/general contractor (CMGC) agreements.

“There’s a great deal of school work, and we always are concerned about competition, and that’s why we got on early with our CMGC projects,” Garry Kryszak, capital projects manager for the school district, said. “Although, at the moment, the bidding competition is good.”

Emerick Construction last June started work on the district’s largest project, a new elementary and middle school in Happy Valley. Skanska USA is on board for a major remodel of Bilquist Elementary School, and P&C Construction in May will begin building Ardenwald Elementary School.

And the district this spring will lock in contracts to build two more elementary schools and one new middle school, as well as a major remodel of Linwood Elementary School.

Beaverton School District comes in second with $195 million in projects. Skanska last summer broke ground on the district’s $22.3 million Bonny Slope Elementary School, which the company is expected to complete by September 2008. A new K-8 school in North Bethany is under design, with construction of the $26.7 million building expected to start this summer.

And the district has hundreds of other projects going, from renovations and additions to building repair and maintenance.

“We were amongst the fastest-growing districts in the state,” Maureen Wheeler, spokeswoman for Beaverton School District, said. “We’ve never been able to totally keep up (with construction). Most of our schools have been pretty close to capacity, and we anticipate we’ll continue to see this pace of growth.”

Contractors benefit

With so much work in the pipeline or already under way, builders that weren’t previously in K-12 construction now have their eyes on the market. And builders that have long worked for the region’s school districts find themselves with more work than usual.

Howard S. Wright last week advertised for subcontractors on its first K-12 school project, Hillsboro’s new 153,000-square-foot South Meadows Middle School. The general contractor, which last year finished work on the 24,500-square foot Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center and has worked on the state’s three largest university campuses, is entering the K-12 market with the flagship project of the district’s $169 million bond measure.

“We’re excited to bring all the expertise on all the other projects we’ve done to bear with vendor and client relationships and effective construction methods in the educational market,” Braun, of Howard S. Wright, said.

LCG Pence Construction has lined up $130 million in school district projects for 2008, including a replacement of Silverton High School in the Silver Falls School District and several renovation projects in the Beaverton School District, said Jay Olson, the company’s business relations manager.

P&C Construction has seven different school projects in various stages of construction: two projects in Beaverton, two in McMinnville, two in Hillsboro and one in North Clackamas. Work on Brown Middle School and Evergreen Middle School in Hillsboro and Barnes Elementary School in Beaverton is already under way. The remaining four projects are in the pre-construction phase.

“We’ve got more going now than is typical, but that’s a sign of a times,” Les Jacobson, chief estimator for P&C Construction, said. “There’s so much out (that) it’s just a good time to be in the school building business.”
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...argest-commerc
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2008, 7:32 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
Renewal of enteprise zone expected to create new jobs
Portland Business Journal - by Wendy Culverwell Business Journal staff writer

One of Portland's best tools for industrial development should return to action this summer after a one-year hiatus.

The city and its development arm let the enterprise zone in North and Northeast Portland expire last year after rules governing the tax incentive program became overly complicated.

The city and the Portland Development Commission asked the state this week to renew an improved edition of the enterprise zone, which already is responsible for supporting roughly 4,300 manufacturing jobs.

The state Legislature created the enterprise zone program in 1985 to encourage industrial investment. Businesses in enterprise zones that invest in new plants or equipment qualify for tax abatements on the investment, an incentive that can be worth millions, especially to capital-intensive operations, such as manufacturers.

The city operated the North Portland enterprise zone for two 10-year terms, but let it expire in 2007 so it could streamline its rules and regulations, which had become overly burdensome, according to Seth Hudson, senior economic development manager for the PDC and manager of the zone.

The PDC and the Port of Portland have both signed off on re-upping Portland's enterprise zone program. The final decision rests with the Oregon Economic and Community Development Department, which administers the state program. The agency should make a decision by July 1.

According to Hudson, 35 companies invested $437 million in new buildings and equipment in the zone before it expired last June. That translates to 4,300 new or retained jobs. The businesses saved a collective $26 million in taxes.

"It is the biggest tool in our toolbox," said Erin Flynn, economic development manager for the PDC.

Presuming the state grants Portland the new zone designation, the improved edition will better connect the fees businesses in the zone pay with their work force needs. For example, if a metals manufacturer needs a dozen workers, the Portland Development Commission would devise a system to recruit and if need be, train, the workers.

Training would take place through the nonprofit Worksystems Inc.

The Portland zone will also have an advisory committee to recommend ways to improve its operation. Hudson promised annual progress reports.

The city didn't lose much by letting the enterprise zone expire for a year, Hudson said. Existing businesses did not lose their benefits and those that wanted to invest did so before last June. Another dozen businesses have expressed interest in operating in the zone, which would take effect July 1.

Service Steel Inc. is one of the businesses already using it.

Ed Westerdahl, president, told the PDC he relocated his business to the zone from Swan Island last year. The company invested about $2 million in equipment and received a tax break.

The payoff has been huge, Westerdahl said.

The company typically does about $20 million a year in steel processing. With the new equipment, Westerdahl predicts the work to rise fivefold to $100 million in 2008. U.S. Barge and Oregon Steel are among Service Steel's leading customers.

Art Fish, who manages the enterprise zone program for the state, endorsed Portland's decision to sit out a year while it retooled local rules for the zone.

Still, he expects a competitive crop of applications from would-be enterprise zone operators this year. Cities, counties, ports and even tribes can apply. The Legislature allows only 59 to exist. When the Portland zone expired in 2007, the state awarded it to Fairview-Troutdale.

Eleven zones are up for renewal this year and there are three vacancies. If the state receives more than 14 applications, someone could be left out.

"We may have to make a hard choice," he said.

Hudson and Fish said it's unlikely Portland will be left out since it has an active zone with significant business investment.

Statewide, the enterprise zone program spurred $540 million in investment in 2007, according to a 2007 report on the state of enterprise zones. The 53 new projects resulted in 1,772 new full-time jobs.

Looking beyond 2007, the roster of enterprise zone projects statewide is expected to swell to $3 billion, involving 110 projects yielding more than 3,000 additional jobs.

wculverwell@bizjournals.com | 503-219-3415
http://portland.bizjournals.com/port...ml?t=printable
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2008, 10:15 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
Hillsboro seeks more enterprise zones
Oregon officials are expected to approve the industry-attracting areas soon
Thursday, March 20, 2008
ELIZABETH SUH
The Oregonian

HILLSBORO -- The city is seeking to attract more solar and bioscience companies by adding about 1,000 acres as enterprise zones.

In an application the city expects the state to approve as soon as this week, Hillsboro asks to double the area of its enterprise zones to boost growth in developing industries.

Enterprise zones are meant to encourage large investments by exempting eligible companies from property taxes on new assets -- buildings and equipment -- for three to five years. In return, companies must meet requirements including minimum levels of jobs, wages and benefits.

One of the areas proposed for an enterprise zone is north of U.S. 26, east of Northwest Helvetia Road. The other two areas are just south of U.S. 26 -- with one parcel north of Northwest Evergreen Road and the other east of Northwest Shute Road.

Larry Pederson, Hillsboro's economic development director, said the areas are attractive to solar companies because much of the property is undeveloped, industrial land by U.S. 26 that was added to the urban growth boundary north of Hillsboro in recent years.

Hillsboro's existing high-tech work force also has expertise in the silicon technology used in solar panels, Pederson said.

SolarWorld, a German solar technology company, and Genentech, a biotechnology company, already are building plants in north Hillsboro, receiving benefits in an existing enterprise zone.

Pederson said other companies looking to make big investments -- such as one $40 million project and another at $2 billion -- have expressed interest in the area.

Hillsboro stepped up the idea of expanding the zones after Schott Solar, a German solar-technology company, passed up Hillsboro in the fall in favor of a site in New Mexico because of state incentives there, he said.

An enterprise zone "gives us more tools to work with industries that we want to attract . . . industries that are highly competitive globally," he said.

The city's three existing enterprise zones total about 900 acres -- the northern area including the Genentech and SolarWorld sites, which stretches between U.S. 26 and the Hillsboro Airport; and two areas including the downtown business district and industrial land southwest of it.

While much of the land in the proposed new enterprise zones is outside Hillsboro limits, the city has designated it for industrial use upon annexation.

Four companies have enterprise zone agreements in Hillsboro -- SolarWorld, Genentech, TriQuint Semiconductor Inc. and Clio Technologies Inc., an Ohio company planning a small manufacturing site.

Those projects are conservatively projected to invest $207 million and employ 650 people, Pederson said.

Because most of them have not been completed, the city has only exempted $42,900 in property taxes so far, he said.

Companies receive an initial tax break in enterprise zones, but the city benefits in the long run through the creation of high-quality jobs and future revenue, Pederson said.

"Once companies get in and get established, they continue to grow, continue to be a contributing community member," Pederson said.

Elizabeth Suh: 503-294-5956; elizabethsuh@news.oregonian.com
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/o...950.xml&coll=7
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2008, 4:15 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
Boeing to hire 500 at Gresham plant
Airplane maker could invest $100M locally
Portland Business Journal - by Wendy Culverwell Business Journal staff writer

Boeing is quietly ramping up the workforce at its state-of-the-art parts plant in Gresham.

With more than 500 new positions advertised in 2007 and more to come, Chicago-based The Boeing Co. is poised to expand its local workforce by as much as 50 percent, bringing its local payroll to an estimated 1,800 workers.

That's big news for the local economy and the 300 or more Oregon companies that provide goods and services to the aircraft maker.

Boeing spent nearly $175 million with its Oregon vendors in 2006, the most current figures available, said Don Schmidt, a Boeing spokesman responsible for Oregon. The same year, Boeing and its employees contributed more than $431,000 to local charities.

"We have a number of businesses that will benefit from Boeing's growth," said Grant Watkinson, president of Coastwide Laboratories, a Wilsonville manufacturer of green janitorial supplies.

Coastwide has supplied Boeing plants around the country for eight years.

"A big firm like that is very important to any local vendor," Watkinson said.

Boeing's business partners also include heavyweights such as Precision Castparts, Oregon Iron Works and Esco.

The aircraft maker is the "quiet giant" of Oregon manufacturing, said Norm Eder, a partner at Conkling Fiskum & McCormick and executive director of the Manufacturing 21 Coalition.

Eder has watched as Boeing transformed Gresham into a world class center for machining, packing its 1.3 million square foot plant with specialized equipment operated by skilled employees.

"It's a major East (Multnomah) County employer," he said. "They're going to drive innovation, especially in the use of titanium in the aerospace world, which is the centerpiece of what they do here."

Manufacturing accounted for 18.3 percent of Portland's $95.6 billion gross domestic product in 2005, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, a higher percentage than manufacturing hotbeds such as Detroit.

"It's the secret part of our economy," Eder said.

Scott Dawson, dean of the School of Business Administration at Portland State University, considers Boeing critical to the local economy. He projects the company will employ as many as 1,800 in the near future, up from 1,200 about 18 months ago.

The company employs 1,600 locally, which represents a tiny fraction of the aircraft giant's 161,500 total employees, according to Schmidt.

Boeing doesn't release payroll figures, but the National Association of Manufacturers reports that Oregon's average manufacturing job pays $49,706 annually, more than $10,000 higher than the average for all jobs.

"Those are highly skilled jobs," Dawson said. "The machinery they have out there is something else."

Although Boeing lost the coveted $35 billion U.S. Air Force Contract for the KC-45A tanker program to rival Northrop Grumman Corp. and its partner, the parent company of Airbus, the controversial decision shouldn't affect the company's Oregon-based work.

"Supporting the tanker program is a very small percentage of Boeing Portland's work," Schmidt said.

In fact, Boeing is poised to continue investing in facilities and equipment in Gresham, to the tune of $80 million to $100 million.

The Gresham City Council approved Boeing's plan to invest in its new enterprise zone in August. By investing in the Gresham zone, Boeing is rewarded with property tax breaks for creating at least 140 new jobs.

City officials said the company has already spent $31 million and filled 142 jobs.

The city and its fellow taxing jurisdictions will waive property taxes on the new facilities and equipment for five years. The deal is worth $4.7 million to Boeing.

Art Fish, who coordinates the enterprise zone program for the Oregon Economic & Community Development Department, said that at $80 million to $100 million, Boeing is making one of the state's larger enterprise zone investments.

He called Boeing a great enterprise zone success. The program promotes economic development with an emphasis on traded sector manufacturing businesses that pay well.

"It's a classic expansion," he said.

There is one significant crimp in Boeing's local plans. The company has not been able to fill its open positions with local talent, Schmidt said. To that end, Boeing is founding member and active supporter of Eder's Manufacturing 21 Coalition.

Eder said the workforce issue is a major challenge facing not just Boeing but most manufacturers regardless of whether they are growing.

"In manufacturing, companies are losing many of their most experienced people to retirement," he said. "The pipeline leading to those skills is largely empty even though they are very well paying jobs."

Boeing reported 2007 revenues of $66.39 billion, with a 6.14 percent profit margin. The company remains a significant presence in the Seattle area, where nearly half its employees are based.

Boeing built its presence in Gresham in the early days of World War II, when the plant was producing parts for the company's B-17 Flying Fortress bomber. In 1974, the company acquired the plant.

Inside the Gresham facility, workers make parts for almost everything in the Boeing catalog, from its commercial airplanes to its defense lineup.

Gresham-made parts are in everything from the workhorse 737 to the new 787 Dreamliner widebody plane.

wculverwell@bizjournals | 503-219-3415
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2008, 5:22 PM
OutrageousJ OutrageousJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 23
Thumbs up Tech firms flock to city's core

http://www.oregonlive.com/business/o...l=7&thispage=1

Quote:
In the past two years, dozens of software companies have taken root or expanded in downtown. Some have kept adding space in the district even amid worries of a broad economic slowdown. The trend has gradually given downtown a burgeoning tract of the tech scene, traditionally concentrated in Portland's western suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2008, 3:00 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
Channel dig nears finish
$170.8M project could be done by 2010
Portland Business Journal - by Erik Siemers Business Journal staff writer
Cathy Cheney | Portland Business Journal

A nearly 20-year project to deepen the Columbia River channel and open it to larger volumes of trade could near its end in two years.

The only thing standing in its way is the federal bureaucracy.

President Bush in February included $36 million in his proposed fiscal year 2009 budget for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Columbia River Channel Improvement Project. Officials with the Army Corps and the Port of Portland say that money would complete most of the work to deepen much of the navigation channel between Astoria and Portland from 40 feet to 43 feet by 2010.

"It would allow us to complete the dredging and I believe all the environmental work," said Dianne Perry, senior project manager for all of the Oregon and Washington-based ports involved in the project. "It's fabulous news -- if in fact we can get that."

That "if" remains an open question as representatives from the Corps and local ports lobby Congress to approve the money. They acknowledge it could be a challenge, particularly during a time when the nation sits on the precipice of a recession.

"I'm sure we're going to have to work hard with the appropriations committees and all of the congressional members from the Pacific Northwest to make a case," said Rick Finn, federal affairs manager for the Port of Portland. "It's impossible for me to predict what the outcome may be."

Further delays could continue to raise the price tag of the project, officials said. As of 1999, the project's estimated cost was $150 million. It has since risen to $170.8 million due to inflation, said Laura Hicks, the project manager for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

The stakes for the project, advocates say, are high -- for both the regional and national economy.

Dave Hunt is executive director of the Columbia River Channel Coalition, a group founded 11 years ago with a mission to bring together the disparate interests of the ports, area businesses, labor unions, farmers and anyone else with a stake in the channel's future.

"The only thing that has changed in the last 11 years is international trade has increased more than people have projected," Hunt said. "Freight volumes have increased more than projected. Frankly, the ports on other West Coast cities have become more congested than people projected."

Completing the deepening project is an opportunity to capture an estimated $18.8 million a year in transportation cost savings for businesses and farmers shipping product through the Columbia River, Hunt said.

Deepening the channel to 43 feet would allow a grain ship to carry an additional 6,000 tons of grain, Hunt said. A container ship would have the added capacity for 300 fully-loaded containers.

"It's a massive economy of scale," Hunt said.

Planning for the project began in 1989, but actual dredging didn't begin until 2005, when a federal judge threw out a lawsuit by Portland-based Northwest Environmental Advocates that claimed, in part, the work could harm the river's estuary and threaten already-endangered salmon species, as well as unearth toxic sediment during the dredging process.

By Oct. 1, the Army Corps will have completed about 70 percent of the project, which includes the addition of various ecosystem restoration features, Hicks said. Both Hicks and Perry said only about half of the 103-mile navigation channel is being deepened.

The $36 million included in the president's budget proposal would complete all but one mile of the project. Hicks said a rock outcropping at river mile 88 near St. Helens must still be removed, but the Army Corps has yet to determine whether it can be extracted mechanically or if it will need drilling and blasting work.

"It could be the most expensive mile in the whole project," she said, "or it could come out with mechanical means and be complete."

Finn, of the Port of Portland, said it's likely the money wouldn't be approved in time for the start of the federal fiscal year Oct. 1. He said it's possible Congress could delay enacting appropriations for federal agencies until early 2009, until a new president is inaugurated.

Hunt, of the Channel Coalition, is also a state representative and the House majority leader from Clackamas County. He believes it's a positive that the deepening money was included in the president's budget; Congress, he said, has had a recent history of approving Bush-pledged money for the project.

It also helps that U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Washington, chairs the Transportation and Housing and Urban Development Subcommittee. He also said every member of Congress from Oregon, Washington, Montana and Idaho has submitted the project as part of their requests to House and Senate appropriations committees.

"It's going to be a challenge and it's going to take the longshoremen whose jobs are at stake, the farmers whose businesses are at stake, and the business owners whose economic security is at stake to be in dialogue with the Congressional delegation," Hunt said. "The only real rub is the really tough overall fiscal climate in D.C. right now."

esiemers@bizjournals.com | 503-219-3418
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Business, the Economy & Politics
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.