HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2008, 7:47 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by StethJeff View Post
if you lack creativity and can't think on your own, then i suppose you're right. why not just do what everyone else does?
You also have to consider the reason behind the name, regardless if it's been used by another sports franchise or not.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2008, 10:26 PM
krudmonk's Avatar
krudmonk krudmonk is offline
Of Heart's Delight
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sannozay
Posts: 1,658
Please please please don't use "Earthquakes."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2008, 11:01 PM
bjornson's Avatar
bjornson bjornson is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 584
To go the way of JDR, but the almighty JDR suggested it...
__________________
"highrises are tall and shiny and expensive and city-like!!! I'm eternally happy our 4 sq miles of shiny highrises is finally getting more shiny neighbors!! If we can't actually be a real city, at least we can look like one in the postcards!!! LAMG, citywatch, bjornson, if you're listening, post more pictures and comments!" - edluva
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 1:51 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,406
Ideas for names:

LA Rampage
LA Tremors
L Pride
LA Monsoon
LA Sol
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 3:53 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Gladiators
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 4:44 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,406
LA Riots
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 5:28 AM
svs svs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 211
If you wqant to bring back an old name, try the Hollywood Stars!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 6:28 AM
DowntownCharlieBrown's Avatar
DowntownCharlieBrown DowntownCharlieBrown is offline
Good Grief
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Downtown, Orange County, L.A.
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
LA Riots


Los Angeles Wild Fires
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted May 10, 2008, 12:40 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,406
I actually would just call them the LAXX
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 4:21 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,087
Bold NFL Prediction: "We are going to have a team here next September"

Thursday, August 28, 2008, by jwilliams

Reporters Jennifer McLain and Ben Baeder of the San Gabriel Valley Tribune report that Los Angeles could have professional football as soon as 2009.
"Majestic Realty Vice President John Semcken also said he believes there is a possibility two NFL teams could wind up playing in the $800 million stadium Roski wants to build in Industry. "We are going to have a team here next September," Semcken said Tuesday afternoon."
While the new Los Angeles football stadium in the City of Industry is being built, the NFL team would play for two seasons in the Rose Bowl. Semcken went on to add that seven teams have "expressed interest" in coming to the new LA stadium. Woo-hoo, football!
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 5:02 PM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
Bold NFL Prediction: "We are going to have a team here next September"

Thursday, August 28, 2008, by jwilliams

Reporters Jennifer McLain and Ben Baeder of the San Gabriel Valley Tribune report that Los Angeles could have professional football as soon as 2009.
"Majestic Realty Vice President John Semcken also said he believes there is a possibility two NFL teams could wind up playing in the $800 million stadium Roski wants to build in Industry. "We are going to have a team here next September," Semcken said Tuesday afternoon."
While the new Los Angeles football stadium in the City of Industry is being built, the NFL team would play for two seasons in the Rose Bowl. Semcken went on to add that seven teams have "expressed interest" in coming to the new LA stadium. Woo-hoo, football!
so let's get this straight. for two years they'll play in the shitty rose bowl that has awful parking, awful traffic, few amenities, etc. then they'll get to play at a stadium located ~30 miles from DTLA right next to the infamous 57/60 interchange where there is basically no public transportation infrastructure. add to that the fact that the city of industry is mostly composed of rows of storage warehouses flanking the 60 freeway.

sounds awful. someone needs to come up with a viable plan that includes a stadium somewhere in the city of la or anaheim where a stadium makes sense, future public transportation access, plenty of parking, etc. this idea for the city of industry doesn't really sound appealing at all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 7:15 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,087
Minnesota Vikings want out....not interested in L.a.

Hold on a minute!!! You guys might want to scratch that out, and make that 6 teams; I just saw on the news moments ago that the Minnesota Vikings seem to have withdrawn from a meeting with Roski because they apparantly have no further interest in the future venue.

As for the location; I was thinking; why not put a stadium somewhere along the beach, like Santa Monica or something like that? It kind of makes sense to me, since playing football on the beach appears to be popular among people.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2008, 7:36 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,087
Pasadena Star-News:


EIR calls NFL site best in Southland

By Jennifer McLain, Staff Writer
Article Launched: 09/03/2008 10:42:45 PM PDT

http://extras.mnginteractive.com/liv...ve_Summary.pdf

An environmental impact report issued Wednesday calls an undeveloped 592-acre parcel near the junction of the 57 and 60 freeways in Industry the best place in Southern California for a professional football stadium. The 800-page report was prepared for Industry by a Costa Mesa research firm. It reviewed the plans of billionaire developer Ed Roski to build an $800 million National Football League stadium. Roski is head of Industry-based Majestic Realty Co., part-owner of the NBA's Lakers and NHL's Kings, and co-owner of Staples Center. He had originally planned to construct a retail and entertainment complex on the site. He switched gears earlier this year in hopes he could bring the NFL back to Los Angeles in time for the 2009 season. The report ranked the Industry site ahead of the Rose Bowl, the Coliseum and the parking lot of Angel Stadium as a location for a pro football stadium. It also found the project would bring air quality problems, noise issues, traffic jams and increased demands for public services to the East San Gabriel Valley. The public has 45 days to respond to the report, which is available at Industry City Hall. Industry's mayor praised the stadium proposal on Wednesday. "Everyone I have spoken to loves the idea of an NFL stadium in the San Gabriel Valley," mayor Dave Perez said. "But they also have the same concern: traffic." The report is a supplement to a 2004 environmental report that examined the impact of Roski's original proposal for mixed retail and office buildings at the location. It looked specifically at the effect of an NFL stadium and sought input from several government agencies, including school and sanitation districts, city councils and transportation agencies. Roski wants to build a 75,000-seat stadium with practice fields, training facilities, and team offices. His proposal also lists a sports medical center as well as restaurants, entertainment facilities, offices and a parking lot to accommodate all usages. Despite projecting an increase in greenhouse gasses, Wednesday's addendum concludes that a stadium on the site is a better alternative than the office and retail complex proposed in 2004. "Emissions generated by the revised Plan of Development would be lower than those generated by the 2004 (plan)," the report notes. "In addition, the revised Plan of Development would result in a reduction of .. building square footage (and) therefore would generate less GHG emissions over the course of construction activities." The report also studied more than 80 key intersections near the site. It concludes that the commercial center proposed in 2004 would generate 92,056 daily vehicle trips. But the stadium at the site on a typical Monday night game would only generate 69,744 vehicle trips. The EIR is split into 14 sections and includes nine appendices. Among the sections are reports on geology, water quality, noise, air quality, aesthetics and transportation. The appendices include a letter from Diamond Bar's planning director that expresses concern about a neighborhood that borders the site. A letter from Clement Lau, a planner with the Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation, expresses concern that games will affect attendance at a nearby golf course. The report also notes that local tribal elders were contacted in case artifacts are discovered during construction. The environmental report is one of the many steps Roski must go through if he wants to bring an NFL team to Los Angeles, which his business partner said last week could happen as soon as next year. Majestic Realty vice president John Semcken said that a team would play at the Rose Bowl until Roski's stadium is completed in 2011. Officials representing San Gabriel Valley cities said they will hold off supporting the project until they have an opportunity to review the report.

jennifer.mclain@sgvn.com

(626) 962-8811, Ext. 2477

www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2008, 9:42 PM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
As for the location; I was thinking; why not put a stadium somewhere along the beach, like Santa Monica or something like that? It kind of makes sense to me, since playing football on the beach appears to be popular among people.
I can't believe this actually needs to be spelled out for someone, but here goes:

1) $$$ - Beachfront property in LA is among the most expensive real estate in the nation.
2) Eyesore. Miami/Waikiki hotels are one thing, but a stadium?? That is not the kind of development that people want near their beaches.
3) Not a very central location. The beaches are relatively close for people in Los Angeles but not to the rest of the metro. In fact its at one of the metro's geographical extremes.
4) Traffic 10x worse than anywhere else.

most importantly . . .

5) WTF do people playing tackle football at the beach have anything to do with someone dropping $1B on the contruction of a 80K-seat stadium????
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2008, 4:16 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,087
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2008, 2:49 PM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Coliseum option was eliminated. Absolutely there is NO professional football team will play in such a stadium, which if USC is not happy, and they have to get out the stadium right away. I respect USC football a lot, but basically It's All About Business. Antonio has already sold Coliseum to USC for "at least" 25 years. I think there shall be optional extension on that contract.

http://www.downtownnews.com/articles...-08-news01.txt

The changes are part of an ongoing series of upgrades that began over the summer and will continue for the next several years as part of the new deal between the Coliseum and the school that will keep the USC football team in the Exposition Park stadium for at least 25 years.

In exchange, the school will pay the Coliseum Commission 8% of the ticket sales as rent and have the right to consent to any football team that wants to play at the Coliseum. The two could also work together on a naming rights deal for the stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2008, 9:41 PM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,068
Driving up and down the 60 a couple of times over the weekend reaffirmed the fact that an Industry stadium would be an awful idea. With the exception of the price tag, I only see negatives building there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2008, 9:01 AM
Buckeye Native 001 Buckeye Native 001 is offline
E pluribus unum
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 31,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by StethJeff View Post
Driving up and down the 60 a couple of times over the weekend reaffirmed the fact that an Industry stadium would be an awful idea. With the exception of the price tag, I only see negatives building there.
Really. That area is congested enough without the hassles associated with stadium traffic...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2008, 7:17 AM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
Ideas for names:

LA Rampage
LA Tremors
L Pride
LA Monsoon
LA Sol

I'm a lurker, obviously, but I'm a football fan, and a son of LA natives (and Rams fans).

These are the worst names I've ever heard of in my entire life, especially the LA Monsoon (LA doesn't feel the effect of the American Southwest Monsoon season). Out of these, the best would be "L Pride", which is misspelled and sucks.

The LA team (hopefully it comes to fruition sooner rather than later) should have a name that has to do with the ocean. I'd pick the Los Angeles Riders or Los Angeles Catchers (ride/catch a wave, or catching fish off the docks or catching abalone) or I'd pick an oceanic species name, like the whales... Los Angeles Whales would be awesome. There are no "whale" mascots in all of pro sports, even though whales are possibly the greatest/most interesting/coolest spiecies of animal on the planet (plus the double meaning of "whale" being a big-time gambler... we all know how LA peeps love going to Las Vegas or LA area casinos.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2008, 11:05 AM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHX31 View Post
I'm a lurker, obviously, but I'm a football fan, and a son of LA natives (and Rams fans).

These are the worst names I've ever heard of in my entire life, especially the LA Monsoon (LA doesn't feel the effect of the American Southwest Monsoon season). Out of these, the best would be "L Pride", which is misspelled and sucks.

The LA team (hopefully it comes to fruition sooner rather than later) should have a name that has to do with the ocean. I'd pick the Los Angeles Riders or Los Angeles Catchers (ride/catch a wave, or catching fish off the docks or catching abalone) or I'd pick an oceanic species name, like the whales... Los Angeles Whales would be awesome. There are no "whale" mascots in all of pro sports, even though whales are possibly the greatest/most interesting/coolest spiecies of animal on the planet (plus the double meaning of "whale" being a big-time gambler... we all know how LA peeps love going to Las Vegas or LA area casinos.)
For somewhat similar reasons, my idea was the LA Mammoth.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.