HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2012, 6:24 PM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 9,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by PacificNW View Post
In regards to this development and possible future projects: How does one go about lifting the height limitations in downtown/Lloyd District? Can this be undone by the city council?
My question is, why are there height limits?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2012, 7:30 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2012, 7:36 PM
MilwaukeeMark MilwaukeeMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek View Post
My question is, why are there height limits?
The height limit in Portland was established in the early 70s in response to public outcry over potential blockage of Mount Hood views. It's directly linked with the completion of Wells Fargo Center.

A lot of cities have height restrictions. Madison, Wisconsin, for instance, has a limit that restricts building height higher than the state capitol building. Closer to home, Lake Oswego has a limit of something like three stories. It's to ensure a village-like feel.
__________________
website
flickr
Follow me on Instagram @markofphotography
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 3:34 AM
RED_PDXer RED_PDXer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 794
The height limits seem plenty big already. 30 or more stories are allowed all over the place. New buildings of that height will certainly add to the skyline and provide sufficient density to make downtown a 24 hour place if just built out a little more. I wonder if the city would actually deny a well-placed, super high rise of 80+ stories with lots of public amenities including a public viewing deck? I doubt it. The post office site in NW may be one such place. Who knows..

Anyway, in 2007 the City published a building capacity study for the central city that showed capacity for over 100 million square feet of development feasible over the next years. It would take 40-60 years to build out this area at a rate of 2 million square feet per year - quite a bit more than we've seen over last 20 years. Also, this study assumed no new development in the central eastside industrial sanctuary area (more than a block or two from MLK/Grand). There's probably just as much capacity there if the zoning was changed and the waterfront restored for urban development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 4:32 AM
2oh1's Avatar
2oh1 2oh1 is online now
9-7-2oh1-!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: downtown Portland
Posts: 2,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grantenfuego View Post
I could see Lloyd in the future being almost an extension of downtown.
I can't imagine it - but I only say that because of how low my opinion of Lloyd Center is, which is based on what I know Lloyd Center to be. This could really help change that. I'll be thrilled if you're right, and there sure is plenty of potential for good things there. This project in particular really excites me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 5:28 AM
MilwaukeeMark MilwaukeeMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2oh1 View Post
I can't imagine it - but I only say that because of how low my opinion of Lloyd Center is, which is based on what I know Lloyd Center to be. This could really help change that. I'll be thrilled if you're right, and there sure is plenty of potential for good things there. This project in particular really excites me.
I moved here about two years ago and I do not have the same perception as you. My fiance works in one of the Lloyd Center towers (PacifiCorp) and I visit often for lunch, etc.. I enjoy the area quite a bit. Holladay Park is real nice and the neighborhoods around the mall are good for walking. The mall isn't full of the most amazing shops in the world (in fact, it's kinda empty, especially with H&M buying so many stores out) but it's not terrible by any stretch. I think a development like this will certainly be an extension of downtown - definitely more than South Waterfront is. As an outsider, I was actually pretty surprised to see South Waterfront built up like it is. Across the river at Lloyd Center is obviously the more choice location. I am very excited to see this project move forward.
__________________
website
flickr
Follow me on Instagram @markofphotography
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 6:08 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,788
The DJC chimes in.

MilwaukeeMark, the mall doesn't interact with the neighborhood at all, it's like a giant retail citadel that sucks the life out of the streets around it.

The South Waterfront was developed so that OHSU could expand while still remaining in the city. The alternative was to build a campus out at Tanasbourne, and take all those jobs with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2012, 5:02 PM
Welkin Welkin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 396
I love the fact that 750 apartments are going up in the Lloyd, but was that a misprint on the cost of the development? $250 million for 750 apartments comes to over $333,000 per apartment. That seems awful high. I wonder what kind of rate they expect to get in order to make that high of a cost per unit financially justifiable. I thought that 1 bedrooms were going around $950 and two bedrooms in the $1,400 or so range. That's pushing a 30-year return rate. What am I missing? Are there other revenue generators in the overall project such large amounts of retail development?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2012, 8:25 PM
mmeade mmeade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welkin View Post
I love the fact that 750 apartments are going up in the Lloyd, but was that a misprint on the cost of the development? $250 million for 750 apartments comes to over $333,000 per apartment. That seems awful high. I wonder what kind of rate they expect to get in order to make that high of a cost per unit financially justifiable. I thought that 1 bedrooms were going around $950 and two bedrooms in the $1,400 or so range. That's pushing a 30-year return rate. What am I missing? Are there other revenue generators in the overall project such large amounts of retail development?
from the DJC article:
820,000 square feet of residential space
50,000 square feet of retail space, where parking exists now.
Additionally, the property has 240,000 square feet of existing office space primarily in the Lloyd 700 Building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2012, 2:25 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
Only 50,000 square feet of retail for a project this large? Even though Safeway is just a few blocks away, I think a Zupans/Trader Joes/Whole Foods type store would thrive in the location. A second downtown Apple or Target store or a CB2, or a thousand other destination retailers that would thrive being located next to Oregon's largest shopping center. Even better, they would be opening up to the street or MAX line instead of the interior of the mall.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted May 18, 2012, 3:37 AM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted May 18, 2012, 1:10 PM
pdxtraveler pdxtraveler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 731
Good to see news is still coming out on this project. I am still nervous it won't be built! It would be SO great for the area, which has so much potential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted May 18, 2012, 3:21 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,598
^^^ Seriously. I will be AMAZED if this gets built, particularly at the heights proposed. I also wonder if a project with so many units will hasten what looks like an inevitable glut of apartments in PDX.

We need more projects like this all over the central city, along with about a million or two more people to fill them and turn Portland into a cosmopolitan metropolis where people throng the streets day and night.
One can dream.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted May 18, 2012, 8:20 PM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
Glut of apartments? Portland has some of the lowest vacancy rates in the country. We need MORE projects like this because that's where most future Portlanders will be living.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted May 19, 2012, 3:05 AM
downtownpdx's Avatar
downtownpdx downtownpdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,696
[QUOTE=tworivers;5705349 We need more projects like this all over the central city[/QUOTE]

I love this proposal but can't help but wish it was located somewhere around the former SW 3rd & Oak proposal, or on any of the central DT area surface lots. Can't wait to see some new high-rise action nonetheless... Lloyd deperately needs exactly what this project would bring in terms of modern high-rise action and mixed-use at street-level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted May 19, 2012, 6:12 AM
2oh1's Avatar
2oh1 2oh1 is online now
9-7-2oh1-!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: downtown Portland
Posts: 2,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by tworivers View Post
I also wonder if a project with so many units will hasten what looks like an inevitable glut of apartments in PDX.
There is absolutely positively no glut of apartments in Portland. We have the opposite problem. I do worry that we'll see the same mistakes from the condo market happen with rentals, where a ton of high priced units are built, but almost nothing affordable. Time will tell. Between 1998 and 2003, condos were being built downtown with prices starting below $140,000. The Roosevelt, Cornerstone, The Mosaic, for example. If I'm not mistaken, two of those three started at under $100,000. By the end of the decade, prices were almost always $250,000 plus - often double that. There was so much greed. People were buying more than they could afford. Developers were building projects priced beyond what the city needed in an attempt at a get rich quick cash grab. What a mess. I really hope the same thing doesn't happen again with apartments. Portland needs apartments badly, but if a similar sky-is-the-limit approach is taken, it'll be a disaster. We'll end up with hard to fill luxury apartments and we'll still have a lack of affordable housing.

Portland's population is growing rapidly. I don't think there will be a glut of apartments. The question is whether there will be a glut of apartments Portlanders can't afford to rent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted May 19, 2012, 3:16 PM
RainDog's Avatar
RainDog RainDog is offline
Semi-Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 277
I've noticed quite a few projects being built or proposed that are built with affordability in mind. No car parking, small sizes and so on. Hopefully that trend continues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted May 19, 2012, 7:56 PM
Grantenfuego's Avatar
Grantenfuego Grantenfuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 108
Quote:
Ruff believes that if Langley's project is successful, it will inspire a number of other large-scale development projects in the Lloyd District. He notes that numerous studies have documented surface parking lots and other under-utilized properties throughout the area that could support tall office, commercial and residential buildings. Such densities are allowed under the zoning policies the council adopted to carry out the Central City Plan.
Very exciting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted May 19, 2012, 8:51 PM
Sioux612's Avatar
Sioux612 Sioux612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 539
I'm interested in seeing the height limits.

Tall-tall (500'+) or Tall for Portland (325')
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted May 19, 2012, 9:32 PM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
Wasn't it a group of people (committee, city council, or commission) who decided what the limits should be? It can be changed, IMO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:38 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.