HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture

    

Willis Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2008, 1:24 AM
rockyi's Avatar
rockyi rockyi is offline
Bah!
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rock Island, Illinois
Posts: 16,399
I first visited the Sears Tower in January 1975 when it was open just a few months. Yep, I was in awe.
__________________
My feet hurt!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2008, 2:24 AM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,487
Here's an example of one of Sears' various event/holiday lighting schemes (taken tonight):
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2008, 3:28 AM
TallMark's Avatar
TallMark TallMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18
Retrofitting Sears?

I understand The Sears is going to be retrofitted by Smith & Gill, to include changing the glass façade. On the other hand, almost ANY change can be an improvement over that cheap run-of-the-mill blackish glass facade that has rendered this otherwise beautifully designed building, a non-entity around the world and even US. Some people here are wondering why this "iconic" building is so unknown. Well, look at it and you ll know the answer! (Come on Chicagoans: don't get offended. Instead do something for this building to become the icon it so richly deserves to be)

Does anyone have any photos or the design and what our imaginative Adrian Smith is going to do to improve the Sears' looks?

I truly hate that cheap blackish curtain over that great building. I am certain the new Sears would become the well-known building it deserves to be once that bloody curtain has been pulled down and something more deserving is put in its place
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2008, 4:55 AM
bnk's Avatar
bnk bnk is offline
પટેલ. કે ન
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 9,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibba View Post
Here's an example of one of Sears' various event/holiday lighting schemes (taken tonight): ]

Another photographic proof that the council of tall buildings screwed up by not including antennae in total height.
__________________
facebook
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2008, 6:38 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,495
Seriously TallMark? I'm not even going to waste time responding to that...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2008, 8:30 PM
truedaniel's Avatar
truedaniel truedaniel is offline
Go Sens!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 89
TallMark,,,,,are you being serious? Surely you are kidding, right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Jan 2, 2009, 8:15 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 8,341
__________________
Harry C --- Chicago rep for SkyRise Cities ---- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2009, 12:26 AM
TallMark's Avatar
TallMark TallMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
Seriously TallMark? I'm not even going to waste time responding to that...
No one can. The bloody façade is downright cheap and ugly. The owners of the building know that too, that is why they have hired Smith & Gill to get rid of it and surface the building with something grand and noteworthy. There is really no need for any response. It is a settled issue, and in time it will be fixed. Just find out what Smith & Gill are going to replace the cheap blackish glass with.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2009, 12:27 AM
TallMark's Avatar
TallMark TallMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by truedaniel View Post
TallMark,,,,,are you being serious? Surely you are kidding, right?
ditto
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2009, 12:50 AM
JMO_0121 JMO_0121 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by TallMark View Post
ditto
This tower is beautiful, the fact that its black makes it unique. When i was up there it was amazing. I have heard of them wanting to make this building green, but I have never heard of them wanting to change the facade. That would be close to (very) impossible. It would be better to bring down the tower, and build it again. The sears tower will always be black, I seriously dont know how you came up with the statement of making the Sear Tower not Black.

How could you change the facade on such a tall tower, I know its possible, but do you know the kind of money needed to do this, not happening, not this year, not next year, but maybe in 50-80 years, when it could* be necessary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2009, 3:55 AM
ChicagoChicago ChicagoChicago is offline
Chicago carpetbagger
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, Atlanta, Nashville
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by TallMark View Post
No one can. The bloody façade is downright cheap and ugly. The owners of the building know that too, that is why they have hired Smith & Gill to get rid of it and surface the building with something grand and noteworthy. There is really no need for any response. It is a settled issue, and in time it will be fixed. Just find out what Smith & Gill are going to replace the cheap blackish glass with.
Please post a link where S&G has talked about altering the facade. Otherwise, you're posting rumors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2009, 7:08 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by TallMark View Post
No one can. The bloody façade is downright cheap and ugly. The owners of the building know that too, that is why they have hired Smith & Gill to get rid of it and surface the building with something grand and noteworthy. There is really no need for any response. It is a settled issue, and in time it will be fixed. Just find out what Smith & Gill are going to replace the cheap blackish glass with.
Its not cheep though, if I recall this tower was actually built with some of the higher quality materials available at the time. From what I've heard the Sears was of a pretty high construction standard, especially considering its age. I live in a building that was finished about a year before the Sears and is made of the exact same materials (black anodized aluminum and glass) and I can tell you our facade is much much cheaper. The aluminum is buckling and wavy in places and even losing its anodization in a few areas. Sears does not have a cheep facade...

BTW the glass is not "blackish" in any way, you must not have looked very carefully because the glass is clearly bronze, the aluminum is black.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2009, 8:33 PM
headcase's Avatar
headcase headcase is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: East Village, Chicago
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoChicago View Post
Please post a link where S&G has talked about altering the facade. Otherwise, you're posting rumors.
I did a quick search, and while I have found articles talking about updating the systems to LEED standards, nothing about changing the look of the building.

Here is the only one I found mentioning the skin.
Quote:
The building’s current owner, which is no longer Sears, has retained architecture firm Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill (Smith, formerly of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, designed Burj Dubai), who will explore how the building’s lighting, mechanical systems, elevators, and glass skin can be updated to bring the building up to LEED standards.
__________________
He was constantly reminded of how startlingly different a place the world was when viewed from a point only three feet to the left.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2009, 8:37 PM
headcase's Avatar
headcase headcase is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: East Village, Chicago
Posts: 452
Sorry, meant to put this in the other post....

This article mentions reglazing, but again nothing about changing the look. I highly doubt that is going to happen. Doesn't make sense....

Quote:
Recently, AS+GG was selected to oversee the greening of the Sears Tower, a commission that could easily have gone to the building's original architects, SOM Chicago. "They were interviewed," Smith says with a discernible grin. The ongoing renovation will involve reglazing of the building, updated lighting, and an overhauled mechanical plant. New green roofs will be installed—the first test section is already in place—along with a rooftop photovoltaic array. In addition, the firm will explore the use of wind turbines as a viable energy source.
SSDD
__________________
He was constantly reminded of how startlingly different a place the world was when viewed from a point only three feet to the left.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2009, 4:20 AM
wrab's Avatar
wrab wrab is offline
Deerhoof Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,658
I know that S+G was working on a hotel for the site, adjacent/contiguous to the original tower - but now gone from the S+G website.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2009, 5:23 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,578
This was the addition

I pulled this off their website
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2009, 6:19 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,495
^^^ I see they have plans to backfill the river and replace it with buildings. Whoever is the developer for that is going to make a hefty chunk of change!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2009, 7:49 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 8,341
Jan 5 2009

As seen from the Lake/Ashland CTA station.
__________________
Harry C --- Chicago rep for SkyRise Cities ---- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2009, 8:14 PM
Zerton's Avatar
Zerton Zerton is offline
Ω
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,678
I don't understand how the antennas aren't an architectural element. Were they not considered in the original plans?
__________________
If all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth. -Orwell
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2009, 4:11 AM
TallMark's Avatar
TallMark TallMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMO_0121 View Post
This tower is beautiful, the fact that its black makes it unique. When i was up there it was amazing. I have heard of them wanting to make this building green, but I have never heard of them wanting to change the facade. That would be close to (very) impossible. It would be better to bring down the tower, and build it again. The sears tower will always be black, I seriously dont know how you came up with the statement of making the Sear Tower not Black.

How could you change the facade on such a tall tower, I know its possible, but do you know the kind of money needed to do this, not happening, not this year, not next year, but maybe in 50-80 years, when it could* be necessary.
Well, D. Trump did that to the tallest building in Manhattan north of the Empire State Building at Columbus Circle (I forget, but I guess it was called the Gulf-Western, right on the Central Park, by the USS Maine memorial). The building was about two-thirds as high as Sears is today. It too had this cheapish, black glass facade. Well, Trump had it totally stripped down, turned the building into a super luxury apartment building, and gave it a real ritzy façade of burnt dark brown glass facade without those cheap metal panes. The building looks superb now. It is accross the street from the new Time Warner twin towers, and very nicely competes with them for elegance its newly-found nice façade.

The Sears, I am sure, would benefit from the same. Its façade needs to be stripped down to the bone, those metal panes thrown away, and the building should get a "Trump" treatment for elegance. Smith & Gill, I am certain, will do justice to this otherwise, magnificient structure (unfortunately, cladded by a cheep robe!!

Last edited by TallMark; Jan 12, 2009 at 5:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:26 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.