HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2012, 5:41 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
The subtle differences between the strip mall and the multi-way boulevard

The subtle differences between the strip mall and the multi-way boulevard


07 Jun 2012

By Geoff Dyer

Read More: http://bettercities.net/news-opinion...-way-boulevard

Quote:
Like its larger cousin the mall, the strip mall has become a symbol for our dysfunctional car-focused suburban environments. Ask any born-again urbanite why, and they’ll tell you that the strip mall’s most damning offense is putting all that parking in front of the store, creating a horrible car-focused environment. But… is it so simple? Take that same urbanite to some of the celebrated boulevards of Paris, Barcelona, or even Chico, California and see those offenses forgiven. The fact is that these wonderful urban environments actually share something with the strip mall: they are on busy car-focused corridors that allow cars to slip out into a slower lane and find parking in front of the store. Yes, parking in front of the store.

- Given the basic ingredients of these two roadways, their differences are really quite subtle on the surface, but their outcome is strikingly different. So what’s up? The reality is, if you take all the basic ingredients of the roadway itself, there are many similarities between the two. You’ve got fast moving lanes in the center. You have a landscaped area at the edge, maybe with or without a sidewalk but definitely with curbs, you’ve got a slower traffic lane near the buildings, and then you have parking. So what is the leap between a strip mall on an arterial and a commercial building on the boulevard? The obvious difference, one might point out, is that each strip mall provides its own parking on its own lot and in its own way. True. But this misses the central issue. The multi-way boulevard provides a connected, high-quality pedestrian realm linking multiple properties. In fact, one could adopt this as the central difference between car-focused suburban environments and urbanism.

- Let’s start with the Strip Mall. Confined by its right-of way, an arterial typically must provide its sidewalk (when it does provide a sidewalk) at the edge of the arterial street. With a parking lot on one side and fast moving traffic on the other (that prohibits a protective layer of on-street parking), no amount of berms and landscaping can make this anything but a conduit for the heartiest pedestrian and bicycle commuters. This sidewalk and landscape berm is punctuated with individual entries for each strip mall (often two) that leads into a parking access lane and parking stalls. Then there is a sidewalk to serve pedestrians from the parking to the store. While sometimes the parking lane is connected to neighboring strip malls (this is now often mandated by jurisdictions), the sidewalks usually are not. This completes the disconnected public environment, the true root of the strip mall/arterial problem.

- Now take the multi-way boulevard. With the higher-speed traffic confined, like the arterial, to center lanes, you find a curb and buffer at the edge — in this case a median that can be paved as a sidewalk or public space, but is more often landscaped with regularly spaced shade trees. Then you have a parking access lane. But unlike the one in front of the strip mall, this one is detailed like a one-way street that stretches from one side of the block to the other connecting property lines. From here you may find parallel or angled parking and then a sidewalk to access the store. But unlike the strip mall, this sidewalk is a true pedestrian realm paved at least 10’ from curb to building, and stretching from one end of the block to the next with a consistent streetscape design linking multiple properties.

- To conclude, I ask the rhetorical question. If there are only subtle differences between the ingredients of the two roadways, there are many successfully built boulevards, and there are far, far more advantages of the multi-way boulevard over the arterial, then why are we still building miles of big dumb arterial streets while our multi-way boulevards are kept locked in the broom closet like Cinderella? I’ll leave it to you to ponder. Meanwhile, here are a few things that might help you get one built:

Corridor Conversions: Converting corridors within established rights of way and fragmented property ownership is hard. Consider allowing the side access lane and parking to occur on private property to define a consistent semi-public realm within private property. You may already have commercial site design standards, so use those to create a connected, high-quality pedestrian realm.

Greenfield is much easier. Stop building new arterials in urban environments.

Focus on a small section first: Don’t take the whole corridor on at once. Find a strategic block or two that is ready for redevelopment and focus your efforts there.

Look for Complete Streets funding: With the addition of a bike lane, the multiway boulevard meets the criteria of a “Complete Street” and may be eligible for various funding sources.

Hire Qualified Advice: Find qualified, experienced consultants who can help you design the boulevard right.

Visit and Analyze Working Examples: Take a delegation of city officials and engineers to visit a few real working boulevards. Nothing beats empirical evidence.

.....



This strip mall on an arterial has many of the same ingredients as a walkable multi-way boulevard.






Shattuck Avenue in Berkeley, California accommodates a lot of traffic, encourages walking, and still allows for parking in front of the building.






The anatomy of a strip mall on an arterial demonstrates a disconnected pedestrian realm with access and standards focused within each individual parcel.






The anatomy of a multi-way boulevard.






The SmartCode and many emerging complete streets standards allow for the multiway boulevard. In a retrofit situation, this one demonstrates how the sidewalk and parking lane could be within private property linked by a common streetscape standard.






With the transformation of the Central Freeway to Octavia Boulevard, San Francisco is a great resource for implementing multiway boulevards.

__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2012, 8:23 PM
Jonboy1983's Avatar
Jonboy1983 Jonboy1983 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The absolute western-most point of the Philadelphia urbanized area. :)
Posts: 1,721
Instead of using a parking lane, suppose you incorporate a 3rd lane solely for buses? I'm actually trying to give my ideas to an economic development company out in Pittsburgh. They're trying to overhaul Pennsylvania Route 51 in the South Hills, which is a major arterial roadway, into something more along the lines of a landscaped boulevard. I'm throwing in the suggestion of bus lanes since this particular corridor begins right at the southern end of a BRT busway.
__________________
Transportation planning, building better communities of tomorrow through superior connections between them today...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2012, 9:19 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
It would be better to put the parking lots behind a streetfront, and have the strip mall esque stores with it's parking relegated to the back. To have both urban and suburban characteristics be there at the same time complimenting each other as opposed to conflicting.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2012, 10:06 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,719
^ There should always be on-street parking in the front of the stores to calm traffic and provide a buffer between pedestrians and traffic. Consider rainy or snowy conditions, speeding cars spraying snow, slush, water, salt, etc. all over the sidewalk and pedestrians when there are no parked cars to act as a shield.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2012, 10:41 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Laybys could do the trick as additional parking.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2012, 11:00 PM
bricky bricky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 588
I always thought that from a visual perspective, suburbs would look so much better if parking were placed behind the storefronts, instead of in front like with current strip malls. There wouldn't be any meaningful change in function I think (99% + of people would still drive), but things would look a lot nicer over time as storefronts instead of billboards and open parking spaces would function as the main advertisement while driving by. That would have to be legislated, since no strip mall developer is likely to break the existing decades long formula and put parking in the back.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2012, 11:09 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
There could also be additional strip malls in the back with the parking, so those places would still have their parking in front of them, and make space for more stores off of the main street.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:49 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.