HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2012, 4:14 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Yes, Georgia, there is a Plan B for transportation

Read More: http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/...ransportation/

Quote:
.....

Sure enough, a Plan B — or, more accurately, the first candidate for Plan B — was unveiled recently. It has much to recommend it. The plan comes from the free-market thinkers at the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, and it includes $3.5 billion in new projects across the state. Here are some highlights:

• The list includes completing the Fall Line Freeway from Columbus to Macon to Augusta, and enhancing U.S. 27 in the western part of the state, to create a new freight network. This, according to a previous study by McKinsey and Co., would allow between 30 percent and 60 percent of large trucks now on metro Atlanta roads — the equivalent of some 100,000 cars a day — to bypass the region entirely.

• It includes almost $2.2 billion of projects from T-SPLOST lists around the state, selected purely on a cost-benefit basis. In metro Atlanta, that means hundreds of millions of dollars for about a dozen projects, such as building a new interchange at I-285 and Ga. 400 and upgrading Tara Boulevard in Clayton County into a super-arterial road.

• It even includes $65 million a year to enhance mass transit around the state. In metro Atlanta, that means creating a true, region-wide network of rapid commuter-bus service and adding $10 million a year in state funds to maintain MARTA’s existing rail system.

.....
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2012, 7:07 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,802
In other words, the highways-first approach.

I'm an outsider, but it sounds like that would be hard to pass. The urban voters would disagree with the minimal transit benefits. The anti-tax people would be against it regardless. Together that would be a hard barrier to overcome.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2012, 7:55 AM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
In other words, the highways-first approach.
Yeah, I have a hard time seeing how this is a "Plan B" and not simply a surrender to automotive interests.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2012, 3:18 PM
atlantaguy's Avatar
atlantaguy atlantaguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Area code 404
Posts: 3,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch.G, Ch.G View Post
Yeah, I have a hard time seeing how this is a "Plan B" and not simply a surrender to automotive interests.
Of course it is. This is what our idiot Governor and clueless Legislature wanted all along....
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.