Quote:
Originally Posted by mSeattle
I view CH/No.BH/FH/QA as "city center" neighborhoods. I don't know, it just feels weird identifying them as "downtown" like CBD. I wonder if "The Village" in Manhattan is viewed as "downtown"? It's probably just something for me to get used to. The city is changing so much, in a good way.
I'm curious what the numbers would look like if you isolate south of Yesler, north of Virginia and east of I-5 (west CH, east CH, FH, Seattle U/12th Ave...).
|
Manhattan is pretty weird. Midtown is more DT than DT. And some of the best shopping isn't in Midterm or DT. For an example, Macy's is around 34th St which is between Midtown and DT...........so what is the area around Macy's considered? And Bloomingdale's is located on the Upper East side. So I don't have a clue what that means for the Village which also is neither in DT or Midtown.
The same is true for SF..........gov't bldgs in SF are at least 10 blocks north[?] of the heart of DT SF which is Union Square. And now South of Market, which for a long time was ghetto has become part of DT SF. DT SF is expanding and that's causing the roles of peripheral areas to change.
I think we are seeing the same thing happening in Seattle. For me, SLU is already part of DT Seattle esp when the Amazon project gets done which I think will act as a link between the two. Ditto with FH. I see FH like Belltown.......a residential area for DT. However, I don't think CH or Lower QA are there yet.