Quote:
Originally Posted by camkazaam
We have no choice but to tear the overpass down, once you look at it. This city is no longer in existence for the convenience of Slidell, Belle Chase, etc. That period of history (1960-2005) is over.
|
I'm in favor of tearing it down, but not because I'm anti-suburb, not because of any radical improvements to crime or education, and not because it will directly create any new good jobs. I'm in favor because its existence is bad urban planning, and there are easy alternatives to the traffic problem. The section of I-10 we are talking about actually demolishing is a convenient cut-through, and not a necessary artery unable to be re-routed. One proposal had a diamond-interchange at Broad Street and another at Claiborne, which could divide East/West traffic for those not wishing to drive the extra distance to I-610. A little more street traffic on those streets could mean more feasible retail, grocery, convenience stores, and gas stations. That is something that may actually create jobs and enhance the neighborhoods. Furthermore, the many unusable blocks of land where the interchange is near the Superdome could finally be put back into commerce (as suggested by the biodistrict master plan).
Basically, with this project I see all of the minuses as being easily fixable, and the pluses being too good to pass up.