Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
^ I wouldn't let them off the hook that easily. They might do good work in their community but at the same time they have a responsibility to be good neighbours and not ones that contribute to the decline of the area. Because all that surface parking does not make for a better neighbourhood.
They could have, and should have worked to find ways to deal with their parking situation without demolishing buildings to add to their already large amount of parking available for Sunday services.
|
I agree, it's criminal but they clearly don't understand that the way you and I do. There is no way they thought, or that we can confirm, that is is causing the neighbourhood to decline.
Quite frankly, their direct, person-to-person work with the poor, if we're gonna jump on pedestals, easily trumps our brand of better urbanism.
I like to think I'm kind, helpful, or generous, and I think they made huge mistakes. But I'm probably millenia short of their efforts from a humanitarian perspective.
Quote:
Originally Posted by borkborkbork
What they (the church and Hydro) did to that block is criminal. It's astonishing to me that the city let them get away with that. There's the same amount of parking, but now a giant swath of the street is yet another giant stone wall fortress. Basically guaranteeing that block stays completely dead permanently. Everyone involved should be ashamed.
|
They probably got what they wanted because they do so much for the people. It's easier for a church to do that the city. Also way cheaper for a church to do it.
Again, not justifying the bad real estate decisions, but that's why I ain't mad.