HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2016, 7:18 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Adding 1 million people along the Wilshire corridor could help L.A. sustainability

Adding 1 million people along the Wilshire corridor could help L.A. create a sustainable city


November 3rd, 2016

By Thom Mayne

Read More: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/livab...103-story.html

Quote:
.....

L.A. will be hotter, with more wildfires and less snow in the San Gabriels. As my colleague Mark Gold, UCLA’s vice chancellor for environment and sustainability, recently described it, the changing climate will make us “sort of like a ‘Phoenix by the sea.’”

- How can we absorb an additional 1.5 million people while accounting for the impacts of climate change, advancing environmental sustainability (100% local water, 100% renewable energy, and enhanced ecosystem and human health) and urban affordability without completely destroying the character that Angelenos love about their city?

- Backers of transit-oriented development, who have the ear of City Hall, favor expanding rail and rapid bus routes across the county and constructing dense, multiuse development alongside those corridors. That effort, however, has drawn pushback from Angelenos who don’t want to see the character of their communities change.

- My studio at UCLA, the Now Institute, proposes a happy medium between sweeping overhaul and stagnation — one that places 1.5 million additional people on only 1% of county land. By adding 1 million more people along the Wilshire Boulevard corridor, and another half million in other transit-oriented areas, we can add needed housing while preserving the neighborhood character.

- Wilshire Boulevard could easily accommodate another million residents. In fact, using Hong Kong’s residential building types, it could accommodate another 8 million people. In our relatively conservative model, the density of the Wilshire corridor would be less than that of Manhattan. The densest neighborhood in the corridor would be Koreatown.

- This densification strategy would allow more Los Angeles residents to live a public transit-based lifestyle in a moderate coastal climate zone — one less prone to wildfires, extreme heat days and associated spikes in electricity consumption. The strategy also diminishes water demand from single-family lawns, reduces vehicular emissions associated with sprawl, and protects an area 10 times its size.

.....


Koreatown could double its population with developments along Wilshire Boulevard, while still being less dense than Manhattan's Upper East Side. (Beyza Paksoy and Elisabet Olle / Now Institute)







Building greater density along the cool Santa Monica coast would minimize regional energy use during the greater number of extreme heat days to come. (Cagdas Delen and Rupal Rathi / Now Institute)







A linear park over the 110 Freeway would transform a barrier between downtown Los Angeles and the rest of Wilshire Boulevard into a connective strip that makes for a more walkable live-work downtown. (Halina Zarate and Devika Tandon / Now Institute)







A vision of an augmented Century City, transformed into a second downtown. (Shareefa Abdulsalam and Niketa Sondhi / Now Institute)


__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2016, 10:05 PM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
disneypilled verhoevenist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: saint louis
Posts: 11,866
might as well dynamite the 405 now.

in all seriousness, well done density looks good on los angeles.
__________________
You may Think you are vaccinated but are you Maxx-Vaxxed ™!? Find out how you can “Maxx” your Covid-36 Vaxxination today!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2016, 11:48 PM
dc_denizen's Avatar
dc_denizen dc_denizen is offline
Selfie-stick vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York Suburbs
Posts: 10,999
look at those fucking golf courses. why are they not parks?
__________________
Joined the bus on the 33rd seat
By the doo-doo room with the reek replete
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2016, 12:12 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen View Post
look at those fucking golf courses. why are they not parks?
Convert them for the homeless.

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2016, 3:41 AM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen View Post
look at those fucking golf courses. why are they not parks?
Gentiles on the left (LA Country Club) and Jews on the right (Hillcrest Country Club). The combined membership constitutes a very major component of the LA power structure. The golf courses are worth literally billions today, but they probably won't be developed or converted to public spaces anytime soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2016, 2:08 PM
dc_denizen's Avatar
dc_denizen dc_denizen is offline
Selfie-stick vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York Suburbs
Posts: 10,999
for a city that lacks parks, those would be pretty awesome locations.
__________________
Joined the bus on the 33rd seat
By the doo-doo room with the reek replete
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2016, 2:45 PM
mrsmartman's Avatar
mrsmartman mrsmartman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 502
What LA needs is a truly mass transit network.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2016, 5:04 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsmartman View Post
What LA needs is a truly mass transit network.
We need the density first.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2016, 1:28 AM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsmartman View Post
What LA needs is a truly mass transit network.

Were doing our best.. 105 miles of hrt and lrt built in the last 25 years, 3 other lines currently under construction and if (hopefully) measure m passes Tuesday, 12 more lines
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2016, 1:54 PM
Leo the Dog Leo the Dog is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Lower-48
Posts: 4,789
2050 isn't that far away. This is a nice dream for urban planners and SSP geeks, but realistically LA is not going to cram 1 million+ people along Wilshire alone. The population growth of the next 30 years will be dispersed all over the LA basin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2016, 2:41 PM
EastSideHBG's Avatar
EastSideHBG EastSideHBG is offline
Me?!?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Philadelphia Metro
Posts: 11,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen View Post
look at those fucking golf courses. why are they not parks?
Video Link
__________________
Right before your eyes you're victimized, guys, that's the world of today and it ain't civilized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2016, 2:45 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen View Post
look at those fucking golf courses. why are they not parks?
Are they public courses? If so I'm with you. If they are private, too bad. If the government tells them what to do what is stopping them from forcing you to move so they can make a municipal parking lot? Nothing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:33 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.