Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford
Why can't South Florida be South Florida? Why does it have to arbitrarily be grouped with other geographies?
|
I have to agree with this. South FL, in its own way, is pretty unique, even unique from the rest of FL (which I'd agree does have that "southern feel"). Yes, geographically, it's in the south, but...
The area doesn't share the South's history (e.g., how many Confederate leaders did the region produce? How many plantations can be found in South FL?). Rather, S. FL was developed and populated by Northerners (e.g., Henry Flagler).
It's population is markedly different from the rest of the South, which is dominated by English and Scotch Irish ethnicities along with African Americans; and, that until very recently, saw very little migration and almost no immigration. South FL is a strange mix of locals (many 2nd and 3rd generation Northern transplants), recent Northern transplants, and Hispanics. You don't even hear a Southern drawl down there.
S. FL has a vastly different culture. It probably has the lowest number of Baptists and Southern Baptists in the south and the highest % of Catholics and Jews. S. FL isn't known for southern delicacies (fried chicken, grits, etc.). The region is highly urbanized and has an almost Northern-like pace.
Even the
climate is different from the rest of the South.
However, the population is too varied to seriously be considered an extension of the Northeast. I myself have made that claim, but it's an exaggeration. Even if S. FL was mostly Northern transplants (it's not), the built environment, history, climate, and culture are too different.
I think it's time to accept South Florida as a unique region. Not the South, not the Caribbean or Latin America, and not the Northeast.