HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    One World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #23581  
Old Posted May 20, 2012, 10:19 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
just over 70 more feet to go... then the comm ring
     
     
  #23582  
Old Posted May 20, 2012, 10:25 PM
The Imster The Imster is offline
Imster
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 78
While WTC 1 is comming along - it looks stunning! - i cant wait to see it topped out wit ht the spire. I cant help thinking how two of these buildings would have looked next two each other - come on, one looks awesome but two....! The price tag for the building is just silly imo! When will it reach its full height before the spire?

Last edited by NYguy; May 21, 2012 at 12:30 PM.
     
     
  #23583  
Old Posted May 20, 2012, 11:17 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,107
Late May, or early June.
     
     
  #23584  
Old Posted May 20, 2012, 11:43 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Does anyone else think that Durst refuses to put the radome on the spire so that the Port Authority eventually pays for it?

never thought of this before but I'm a bit suspicious.

PS. yea sorry to bring up the spire again it's just I couldn't help wondering.
     
     
  #23585  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 12:38 AM
chris123678's Avatar
chris123678 chris123678 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Does anyone else think that Durst refuses to put the radome on the spire so that the Port Authority eventually pays for it?

never thought of this before but I'm a bit suspicious.

PS. yea sorry to bring up the spire again it's just I couldn't help wondering.
No, because they still won't want it up because they'd have to shed money if it ever became damaged.
     
     
  #23586  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 12:48 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Quote:
No, because they still won't want it up because they'd have to shed money if it ever became damaged.
well they're gonna have to shed money if the building itself becomes damaged too... or the antenna...

I don't see the logic

Last edited by Zapatan; May 21, 2012 at 3:01 AM. Reason: typo
     
     
  #23587  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 1:28 AM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,040

8 spruce 1 wtc by Jack N on Flickr
     
     
  #23588  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 2:20 AM
Kevin Scott Koepke Kevin Scott Koepke is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 252
     
     
  #23589  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 4:39 AM
Don098 Don098 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rosslyn, VA
Posts: 1,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11 View Post

8 spruce 1 wtc by Jack N on Flickr
That's beautiful. Too bad it won't look like that. Fuck you, Durst.
     
     
  #23590  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 7:33 AM
Dense_Electric Dense_Electric is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 131
What do you guys think the odds are of either the original radome cladding or some other design being added at some point in the future (years or even decades from now)? After all, they're going with the original internal design - seems like cladding could be added when New York gets somebody with some balls in a high enough position.
     
     
  #23591  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 10:55 AM
QUEENSNYMAN QUEENSNYMAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 1,270
     
     
  #23592  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 11:40 AM
MadGnome MadGnome is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dense_Electric View Post
What do you guys think the odds are of either the original radome cladding or some other design being added at some point in the future (years or even decades from now)? After all, they're going with the original internal design - seems like cladding could be added when New York gets somebody with some balls in a high enough position.
None. The mast structure and antenna placement would be different for cladding. Deleting cladding will make adding antennas harder. Now the antennas and mounts will be outside instead of inside and they'll need to be mounted and rated for hurricane force winds. They might save having to maintain the cladding, but it will make installing and maintaining the antennas and the mast a lot harder. They'll also have to worry about appearances a lot more. all of which will make the site less attractive to users and bring in less revenue.
It was a short sighted decision.
     
     
  #23593  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 12:48 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dense_Electric View Post
What do you guys think the odds are of either the original radome cladding or some other design being added at some point in the future (years or even decades from now)?
After all, they're going with the original internal design - seems like cladding could be added when New York gets somebody with some balls in a high enough position.
Not gonna happen. Once those broadcasters are up there, they're not gonna let anything mess with their signal, I don't care how many backups Durst has. It's not just a matter of
simply adding cladding to the antenna, but the "house" around it.


superbowl2265













kj_kramer





Rakesh -Close Encounters of the Third EYE





Paul_Bonnar





jag9889

__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #23594  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 2:51 PM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
A bit old but still delivers...


New Beginnings Part 2 von Aleks Ivic auf Flickr

And a recent one...


Extra Golden Evening von PeetThePhotographer auf Flickr
     
     
  #23595  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 9:05 PM
Modulair's Avatar
Modulair Modulair is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 97
400 meters

forgive me if i prefer to use meters, but, as i'm european, it's very hard for me to make an idea of height with feet..

So, i wanted to know if the next "jump" will make the tower pass the height of 400 meters , and when will this jump occur

for me, 400 meters is THE most important milestone for freedom tower in order to dominate the skyline !
     
     
  #23596  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 9:11 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Modulair View Post
forgive me if i prefer to use meters, but, as i'm european, it's very hard for me to make an idea of height with feet..

So, i wanted to know if the next "jump" will make the tower pass the height of 400 meters , and when will this jump occur

for me, 400 meters is THE most important milestone for freedom tower in order to dominate the skyline !
The next jump will bring us to 400 meters, or 1,313 feet.
     
     
  #23597  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 9:22 PM
chris123678's Avatar
chris123678 chris123678 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 473
I've seen rumors on skyscrapercity last week that base glass has begun.
They also have added some type of platform on the top of the base as well.

Maybe they are going to begin.

I was told that it wouldn't start until late this year.
     
     
  #23598  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 9:30 PM
Yankee fan for life's Avatar
Yankee fan for life Yankee fan for life is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brooklyn new York
Posts: 287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Modulair View Post
forgive me if i prefer to use meters, but, as i'm european, it's very hard for me to make an idea of height with feet..

So, i wanted to know if the next "jump" will make the tower pass the height of 400 meters , and when will this jump occur

for me, 400 meters is THE most important milestone for freedom tower in order to dominate the skyline !
1 wtc is now 395 meters in height.
     
     
  #23599  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 9:30 PM
Jonboy1983's Avatar
Jonboy1983 Jonboy1983 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The absolute western-most point of the Philadelphia urbanized area. :)
Posts: 1,721
Forget the Twin Towers. The new design has grown on me, and I can't wait for it to top out. I'm still miffed about the last-minute short-sighted thoughtless design change to the spire tho. I still say it's the wrong move...
__________________
Transportation planning, building better communities of tomorrow through superior connections between them today...
     
     
  #23600  
Old Posted May 21, 2012, 10:22 PM
brooklynbandit brooklynbandit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewYorkDominates View Post


Premiering Sunday,May 20th on National Geographic Channel
8:00 P.M. E.S.T.

"The Empire State Building is an American icon. It is perhaps the most recognizable building in the world. It is a cultural landmark, an amazing accomplishment, and a metaphor for the American dream. Now, as the Empire State Building nears its 80th anniversary, a new building is rising above Manhattan to join it in defining the New York skyline: Tower One of the World Trade Center. This building, which sits just next to the footprints of the fallen Twin Towers, will also have a strong emotional symbolism for Americans. Empire tells the fascinating story behind these two steel giants. How has skyscraper construction changed in 81 years? How has it remained the same? And who are the men and women responsible for bringing these engineering masterpieces to life?"
dont mean to go off track but does anyone have a link or anything to this,thanks in advance and sorry for any off tracking of the thread
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.