HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Panorama Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Miami Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 3:34 PM
UrbanImpact's Avatar
UrbanImpact UrbanImpact is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,375
MIAMI | Panorama Tower | 868 FT| 80 FLOORS

http://miami.curbed.com/archives/201...nstruction.php
Action Starts At 1101 Brickell, Miami's Next Tallest Building
Thursday, October 4, 2012, by Sean McCaughan

Earlier this year developer Tibor Hollo (a guy that's been building things in this town for as long as anyone can remember) announced his stalled project 1101 Brickell, Miami's future tallest building, would begin construction at the end of the year. Well, continuing today's apparent Curbed Miami theme of previously stalled big name projects that are back on line, Hollo told the Daily Business Review, in an article about one of Miami's last Bayfront parcels, that site work has already begun on 1101 Brickell. (How's that for a run-on sentence?) That would mean late September or early October, three solid months before the end of 2012. The building was originally designed by architect Kobi Karp to be 80 stories, 849 feet tall, and entirely residential except for a retail segment at ground level, which is presumably still the case.

     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 5:42 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 13,095
Nice size
__________________
Check out the latest developments in Pittsburgh:
Pittsburgh Rundown III
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 5:53 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,365
Aren't they having a problem in Miami selling condo units that are ALREADY CONSTRUCTED?

Why would developers build more?
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 6:00 PM
UrbanImpact's Avatar
UrbanImpact UrbanImpact is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
Aren't they having a problem in Miami selling condo units that are ALREADY CONSTRUCTED?

Why would developers build more?
They are not having problems selling, which is why developers are building more (just not at the crazy pace as during the boom). Many of these condos are bought from international buyers.
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 6:02 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanImpact View Post
They are not having problems selling, which is why developers are building more (just not at the crazy pace as during the boom). Many of these condos are bought from international buyers.
Ahh gotcha, I thought there were still tons of empty units on the market in Miami.
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 6:04 PM
UrbanImpact's Avatar
UrbanImpact UrbanImpact is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
Ahh gotcha, I thought there were still tons of empty units on the market in Miami.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/bu...fill-up/nL5PY/

74% condos were occupied in 2010, I'm not sure what the number are now.
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 6:33 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,098
For a new tallest, the design is... lacking. But good to see that a new tallest is moving forward.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 6:46 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,079
In any case this it would be awesome if it got built, yet One Bay Plaza, if finished first would top this
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 8:03 PM
Dale Dale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by colemonkee View Post
For a new tallest, the design is... lacking. But good to see that a new tallest is moving forward.
Still beats hell out of the ill-fated Met III. It's a worthier tallest.
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 8:15 PM
dave8721 dave8721 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,043
Also from what I've seen they are considering launching it as a rental tower. Rentals in the downtown area are something like 95% occupied with rental prices rising a good 10% to 20% per year. Brickell's median rent was up to $2,239/month at the end of 2011.

Quote from the developer:
Quote:
"I'm very confident" in the viability of the 1101 Brickell project, Hollo said.

"The rental market is just extraordinary," Hollo said. "Many people don't want to buy; they want to rent. So we're catering to that market."
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 8:22 PM
dave8721 dave8721 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,043
Its pretty ho-hum for a new tallest, and the Banco Santander Design which is a thousand times better and right around the corner from this site would only be 840-feet high so 1101 Brickell would still be the tallest until (if) One Bayfront Plaza got built.
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 9:10 PM
Dale Dale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,801
I actually like the overall shape, not so much the podium. Is that a sort of glass ring at the top ?
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2012, 10:01 PM
Private Dick Private Dick is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: D.C.
Posts: 3,125
As Dale said, better than the Met 3 proposal.

I think it's attractive... just looks exactly like all the others... white with bluish-green glass/balconies. I like a tallest to stand out... this will just look like the king surrounded by all his midget condo subjects.

Definitely nice, but nothing inspiring or exciting., considering the lack of originality.
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2012, 4:43 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,327
That sure does look taller than 849 feet. If I didn't see the height listed I'd think it's a supertall.
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2012, 4:58 AM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
That sure does look taller than 849 feet. If I didn't see the height listed I'd think it's a supertall.
Actually, yes it is. it's super tallest tower. I think they have more than 80 floors. I don't believe if they have observation deck or not. It's whether if they build one.
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2012, 5:09 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
Miami deserves better...looks like an over sized generic condo tower just like the others that have sprung up all around Miami. none the less it will add to the Density and overall quality of the skyline.
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2012, 8:47 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by N830MH View Post
Actually, yes it is. it's super tallest tower. I think they have more than 80 floors. I don't believe if they have observation deck or not. It's whether if they build one.
"supertall" means over 1000 feet.
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2012, 8:47 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
That sure does look taller than 849 feet. If I didn't see the height listed I'd think it's a supertall.
It reminds me of a bigger version of the Austonian.
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2012, 4:10 PM
Private Dick Private Dick is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: D.C.
Posts: 3,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
It reminds me of a bigger version of the Austonian.
The Austonian is a much more distinctive design though... a taller Austoninan would stand out on the Miami skyline. This new one in Miami is nice, but just too similar to all of the other new "Florida" style condos built in Miami in the last boom.


http://www.jhjackson.com/austin-skyl...nian-building/
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2012, 5:30 PM
UrbanImpact's Avatar
UrbanImpact UrbanImpact is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,375
^^Agreed! This tower is "meh"
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.