Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolCzech
I do like the FT, but I'll always miss that "Venetian" facade the old towers shared - shades of this:
|
Yeah, the SOM 1WTC is clean and futuristic, but the Yamasaki towers were that unique, quirky, semi organic/partially zen/structurally expressive/monumental combination that no building of that era quite matched. A quick look would deem them banal, but it was anything but that. Ill conceived? Sure. Oversized? Definitely. Just not uncreative.
Anyone thinking that the new buildings won't be overwhelming is in for a surprise. This World Trade Center is bigger and denser than the last one. The guiding hand of a master planner given way to five huge buildings struggling to be noticed in a sea of glass and a crowd of people. It is, in a way, the antithesis of the original plan, but will serve to fulfill essentially the same program.
New Tower 1368 to parapet. Old Tower: 1362 to Parapet, 1368'7 to roof peak, which rounds out to the tower actually being 1,369 feet tall. Interesting.