HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2006, 2:57 PM
sjones sjones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
This is moving very slowly. They have playing around in that old garage for four or five months now. I hope we see something rising up soon. Murano is way ahead of RARC at this point.
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2006, 10:37 PM
williamphilapa's Avatar
williamphilapa williamphilapa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NE Philadelphia
Posts: 1,798
10_1_06 - drive by...the crane


__________________
Comcast Renderings
_____________________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy -Ben Franklin
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2006, 1:28 AM
spm1956 spm1956 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 72
Seems like more activity at RATR, at least the crane moving a lot more---does anyone have any of those pics looking down from nearby buildings to see what's happening down there?
__________________
SPM1956
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2006, 6:44 AM
apetrella802 apetrella802 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 546
emporis does indicate the RATR as Under Construction for the first time
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2006, 7:24 PM
therealdawk therealdawk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
I'm kinda lost as to where this thing is. Still digging dirt? Pouring concrete? What's up?
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2006, 10:23 PM
volguus zildrohar's Avatar
volguus zildrohar volguus zildrohar is offline
I Couldn't Tell Anyone
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The City Of Philadelphia
Posts: 15,988
Utility work underground and shoring up the remnants of the supports for One Meridian Plaza being used for this tower.
__________________
je suis phillytrax sur FLICKR, y'all
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2006, 12:52 AM
spm1956 spm1956 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 72
I hear should be rising out of the ground by mid-late December
__________________
SPM1956
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2006, 8:28 PM
MetroSplash's Avatar
MetroSplash MetroSplash is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 101
From 10/14. Lots of noise and activity, not too much visible progress.
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2006, 10:37 PM
apetrella802 apetrella802 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 546
section J of the sunday inquirer features the RATR on the front page, with some human interest story about CC condo byers
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2006, 10:45 PM
volguus zildrohar's Avatar
volguus zildrohar volguus zildrohar is offline
I Couldn't Tell Anyone
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The City Of Philadelphia
Posts: 15,988
The story didn't interest this human.
__________________
je suis phillytrax sur FLICKR, y'all
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2006, 3:40 PM
McBane McBane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,718
Anyone else have trouble logging in yesterday? I would say yes based on the lack of postings on Philly V.

The Inqy had their usual fluff real estate piece, only this time, it provided some good info on the RATR. According to the construction manager, all work is being done underground and it won't be much longer til they start pouring the concrete for the foundation and the building begins to rise. That's the good news - a firm statement that this project is continuing.

What bothered me however, was that the article stated the building would rise 485'. That is a true dissapointment because i was under the impression it would be 30 feet higher. 30 feet may not seem like much, however it is enough to distinguish itself from the clutter of all the 480-490 footers in penn center. now, if this is true, RATR will just add to the clutter instead of rising above and making an impact on the skyline.

Finally, i must wonder if this building will be a giant Beaumont with an enormous blank wall facing what hopefully will become 1441 chestnut. in fact, unless someone knows otherwise, i think it is safe to assume that this is the case. figure Beaumont and 101 Walnut were built in that style because they were on property lines and maybe someone may build a nieghboring structure. in the case of RATR, a neighboring building is in the works (whether or not 1441 gets built, the location can't be beat and eventually something will be built). plus in a tower of that size, the $ savings of not having to put up a 4th glass wall must be immense. As for the property lines, these 2 plots are so small that there is no possible way that RATR doesn't abut the property line.

unlike the other two buildings on front street, i don't think that the concrete wall will be such a big deal. as mentioned above, it is inevitable that something will be built accross from the potential blank wall - that location is too good. whether it's another 2 years or 10 years, i don't think it will exceed that timeframe. and to put a positive spin on the concrete wall - if that is the case - once this building begisn to rise - it's going to fly; it will probably be finished faster than the murano.
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2006, 4:00 PM
Late1's Avatar
Late1 Late1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philadelphia Metro (Chesco)
Posts: 2,298
Hopefully the 485' measurement given was just an outdated figure. That seems to happen a lot in news articles since journalists tend not to be height geeks like us when it comes to exact, updated figures.
__________________
pretty, pretty pictures
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2006, 4:07 PM
volguus zildrohar's Avatar
volguus zildrohar volguus zildrohar is offline
I Couldn't Tell Anyone
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The City Of Philadelphia
Posts: 15,988
Yes, I have to concur on the height figure. 518 feet was the figure after the final remodel of the building and as Late1 said figures like that are rarely updated as often as we would like.
__________________
je suis phillytrax sur FLICKR, y'all
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2006, 4:27 PM
apetrella802 apetrella802 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 546
i asked for an recieved the official marketing brochure that is given to perspective buyers. It states that the building will be 518 feet tall and have 48 stories.
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2006, 5:39 PM
Cro Burnham's Avatar
Cro Burnham Cro Burnham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: delco
Posts: 2,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane
Finally, i must wonder if this building will be a giant Beaumont with an enormous blank wall facing what hopefully will become 1441 chestnut. in fact, unless someone knows otherwise, i think it is safe to assume that this is the case.
The back wall is not so bad at all - more interesting than the front in may regards. Check out the model in the hotel lobby.

Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane
plus in a tower of that size, the $ savings of not having to put up a 4th glass wall must be immense.
I'm not sure a blank wall (especially if is concrete) is cheaper than glass. Concrete is probably a lot heavier, more time consuming to build, and more labor intensive than prefab window panel installation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane
As for the property lines, these 2 plots are so small that there is no possible way that RATR doesn't abut the property line.
There is a small alley (Ranstead Street?) between the two parcels. So I assume they will be at least 20' -30' apart.
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2006, 6:54 PM
sciguy0504 sciguy0504 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 448
I believe the tower was specifically designed to deal with the small plot and close property line. In other words, I do not think there will be a blank wall on one side.
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2006, 8:55 PM
shakman's Avatar
shakman shakman is offline
Chairman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PRMD - People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 2,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by apetrella802
i asked for an recieved the official marketing brochure that is given to perspective buyers. It states that the building will be 518 feet tall and have 48 stories.
Not bad. Although I do not think this tower will make a great impact on the skyline. Perhaps an impact driving south on I-95 towards Center City.
__________________
"I measure the value of life not by how much I have, instead by what I have done.

-sb
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2006, 9:23 PM
SouthPhilly's Avatar
SouthPhilly SouthPhilly is offline
Philly Roots
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tribeca
Posts: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane
Anyone else have trouble logging in yesterday? I would say yes based on the lack of postings on Philly V.

The Inqy had their usual fluff real estate piece, only this time, it provided some good info on the RATR. According to the construction manager, all work is being done underground and it won't be much longer til they start pouring the concrete for the foundation and the building begins to rise. That's the good news - a firm statement that this project is continuing.

What bothered me however, was that the article stated the building would rise 485'. That is a true dissapointment because i was under the impression it would be 30 feet higher. 30 feet may not seem like much, however it is enough to distinguish itself from the clutter of all the 480-490 footers in penn center. now, if this is true, RATR will just add to the clutter instead of rising above and making an impact on the skyline.

Finally, i must wonder if this building will be a giant Beaumont with an enormous blank wall facing what hopefully will become 1441 chestnut. in fact, unless someone knows otherwise, i think it is safe to assume that this is the case. figure Beaumont and 101 Walnut were built in that style because they were on property lines and maybe someone may build a nieghboring structure. in the case of RATR, a neighboring building is in the works (whether or not 1441 gets built, the location can't be beat and eventually something will be built). plus in a tower of that size, the $ savings of not having to put up a 4th glass wall must be immense. As for the property lines, these 2 plots are so small that there is no possible way that RATR doesn't abut the property line.

unlike the other two buildings on front street, i don't think that the concrete wall will be such a big deal. as mentioned above, it is inevitable that something will be built accross from the potential blank wall - that location is too good. whether it's another 2 years or 10 years, i don't think it will exceed that timeframe. and to put a positive spin on the concrete wall - if that is the case - once this building begisn to rise - it's going to fly; it will probably be finished faster than the murano.
More people actualy see the belmont and 101 walnut because of 95.
Am I wrong to say no one has done anything about the blank wall behind the ritz hotel since the fire.
This building won't impact the skyline by a difference of 30 feet. Although i would like it to be a lot different then Penn Center, which i hate.
__________________
E-A-G-L-E-S http://www.insidetheeagles.com/
Keep comcast Below 1000'
WE WANT A PHISH HALLOWEEN JAM (in NewYork & Philly)
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2006, 3:39 PM
Waybat Waybat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1
Ritz Wall

According to Jane Golden of the Mural Arts Project (on NPR 11/9), a huge mural for the 22 story Ritz Carlton wall is in the works!
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2006, 6:58 PM
omp835's Avatar
omp835 omp835 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 792
[QUOTE=Am I wrong to say no one has done anything about the blank wall behind the ritz hotel since the fire.
[/QUOTE]
If you look at some of the renderings, it does show a restored wall. Not sure if that indicates the actual intentions of the developer or if the architect was drawing pretty pictures. But I am optimistic.
__________________
My speling sux. Git over it.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.