Moving this here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr
Depends on how much you're willing to spend. The IOC is only playing lip service to making the Olympics more affordable for host cities and I expect that $5B or so is the absolute minimum that any Winter Olympics will cost with Summer being about twice that. Sochi and Beijing are the new standards of excess and payouts to the IOC that are expected.
24-year old facilities will not be tolerated in the gilded age of the Olympiad.
|
I don't think so. It's already an embarrassment to the IOC that literally all the other countries except China and Kazakhstan dropped their bids for 2022. Beijing is the first city to get both Summer and Winter Olympics and it isn't because they wanted it to happen...
Things are changing in the world. This website is a great snapshot for that. We've seen the emerging world become a place for mega projects and skyscrapers and we've seen them fall for spending way too much to try and show the developed world that they've arrived. Outside of India things are not looking so good for emerging markets.
In developed countries you have rising costs across the board in healthcare and other social programs mixed with pretty lack luster GDP in Europe even by the best in class like the UK and surprisingly Spain.
Now lets couple that with the fact that the USA is extraditing FIFA top brass on corruption charges where we can see trails of corruption bread crumbs leading to the decisions to send the World Cups to the BRICs and then the current situation and the challenges moving forward for these organizations becomes a lot more clear.
I think the best thing the IOC could do to show good faith in turning this Titanic away from an iceberg would be to showcase how a city could do an Olympics with great infrastructure and facilities, protection and respect for LGBT and multicultural athletes with as little money expended as possible.
Even if SLC rebuilt every facility it constructed in 2002 and remodeled every facility it remodeled for 2002 it wouldn't cost over 2 billion. There hasn't been THAT much inflation since 2002!
I think if the IOC doesn't fix their shit, we're gonna see alternatives break through (Does anyone care about the World's Fair anymore?). The PAN AM games that just took place in Toronto have arguably been a new benchmark in the event's prestige. Even the FIFA Women's Soccer in Canada which has been treated like a joke by FIFA, blew up everyone's low expectations with how well it was received and watched on TV.
The world is changing but with events that don't happen for 7 years there tends to be a bit of a lag.
Also, I'd like to add that the reason we're talking about this right now is because Boston withdrew their bid from the Summer Olypmics which of course ups the odds of the US Olympic Committee allowing a Winter Olympic bid. But this is also a sign of the times. This is a major city who had to withdraw because of a lack of support from its citizens for a Summer Olympics. I think my former argument stands that austerity and slim budgets for building highways and healthcare is a real mood killer for hosting Olympics, but I also think the brand has taken a major beating because of their event location choices. Did you read about how Brazil wants athletes to swim in the Ocean outside of Rio where two teaspoons of water when ingested will more than likely cause illness because of the high concentration of sewage? Boston knows they're better than that.