HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 30, 2012, 11:58 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Well-Educated Flock to Some Cities, Leaving Others Behind

Well-Educated Flock to Some Cities, Leaving Others Behind


May 30, 2012

By SABRINA TAVERNISE

Read More: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/31/us...d.html?_r=2&hp

Quote:
DAYTON, Ohio — As cities like this one try to reinvent themselves after losing large swaths of their manufacturing sectors, they are discovering that one of the most critical ingredients for a successful transformation — college graduates — is in perilously short supply. Just 24 percent of the adult residents of metropolitan Dayton have four-year degrees, well below the average of 32 percent for American metro areas, and about half the rate of Washington, the country’s most educated metro area, according to a Brookings Institution analysis. Like many Rust Belt cities, it is a captive of its rich manufacturing past, when well-paying jobs were plentiful and landing one without a college degree was easy.

- Dayton sits on one side of a growing divide among American cities, in which a small number of metro areas vacuum up a large number of college graduates, and the rest struggle to keep those they have. The winners are metro areas like Raleigh, N.C., San Francisco, and Stamford, Conn., where more than 40 percent of the population has a college degree. Metro areas like Bakersfield, Calif., Lakeland, Fla., and Youngstown, Ohio, where less than a fifth of the population has a college degree, are being left behind. The divide shows signs of widening as college graduates gravitate to places with a lot of other college graduates and the atmosphere that creates. “This is one of the most important developments in recent economic history of this country,” said Enrico Moretti, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, who recently published a book on the topic, “The New Geography of Jobs.”

- Historically, most American cities have had relatively similar shares of college graduates, in part because fewer people went to college. In 1970, the difference between the most-educated and least-educated cities, in terms of the portion of residents with four-year degrees, was 16 percentage points, and nearly all metro areas were within 5 points of the average. Today the spread is double that, and only half of all metro areas are within 5 points of the average, the Brookings research shows. “There’s a relentless cycle in which knowledge breeds knowledge, but the flip side is that many places are left out,” said Alan Berube, a senior fellow at Brookings who conducted the analysis.

- In a pattern that is part education, part family background, college graduates tend to have longer life expectancies, higher household incomes, lower divorce rates and fewer single-parent families than those with less education, and cities where they cluster tend to exhibit those patterns more strongly. Montgomery County, where Dayton is located, has a premature death rate that is more than double that of Fairfax County, Va., the highly educated Washington suburb, according to Bridget Catlin, a University of Wisconsin researcher. Now, Dayton is racing to produce, attract and retain college graduates as a badly needed food for its hungry economy. But it is a painstaking process. Kate Geiger, who lost her job at General Motors in 2008, said she would never forget the feeling of sitting in a college classroom for the first time after 24 years on the factory floor.

- Charlotte, once a city with very little education, now has a population that is more than a third college graduates. Ms. Shomaker estimated that 60 percent of her friends were moving to other cities. Dayton’s past was rich, but by the 2000s the city was in trouble. It lost half of its manufacturing jobs in 12 years, according to Richard Stock, an economist at the University of Dayton. When the city’s last Fortune 500 company, National Cash Register, left in 2009, residents were jolted into action. “Our premise is you have to change people’s mind-set,” said Thomas Lasley, the former dean of education at the University of Dayton, who runs Learn to Earn, the city’s effort to increase its share of college graduates. “We have to go from one where people think of themselves as being in a high-school-attending culture to being in a college-attending culture.”

.....



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 12:31 AM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,802
That's it, my pretties. Educate people who will subsequently move here. (Hell, we're not paying to educate enough people; might as well allow inbounds to pick up the slack.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 12:59 AM
bobdreamz's Avatar
bobdreamz bobdreamz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami/Orlando, FL.
Posts: 8,130
What does the chart mean? There is no key to it.
__________________
Miami : 62 Skyscrapers over 500+ Ft.|150+ Meters | 18 Under Construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 1:01 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobdreamz View Post
What does the chart mean? There is no key to it.
You have to look on the website, but the grey dots represent cities within 5% of the national average, black dots more than 5% above and orange dots more than 5% below in terms of the % of college grads. The one on the left is 1970 and the one on the right is 2010 or so.

They basically show that the distribution has a much longer tail (at both ends) now than it used to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 1:03 AM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobdreamz View Post
What does the chart mean? There is no key to it.
The map on the left is 1970, the one on the right is today. Orange cities have lower percentages of residents with college degrees, gray are cities within 5 percentage points of the average, and black are the most educated cities.

Average percentage of residents with college degrees in 1970: 12%
Average in 2010: 32%
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 1:06 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
This is hardly a new phenomenon though. America's most desirable cities have been sucking the life force from the crappy ones as the services economy has severed the link between economic productivity and geography.

If you don't need to live in a particular place because it has a river to drive mills or navigate with bargers, or a seam of coal, or whatever, then you live where you want to live.

The problem for a lot of declining cities in the Rust Belt and Great Plains is that there's no reason for them to recover. Chicago went through a period of decline, but survived because it was "too big to fail", and now sucks the best and brightest from the whole upper middle part of the country. It begs the question of whether we really need to have as many cities as exist today.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 1:06 AM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
I thought the text was part of the image, I guess it was text.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 1:12 AM
Shawn Shawn is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 5,941
Here's the Top 10 from the full data set:

1. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria: 46.8% with a 4 year degree or more, +24.7% from 1970
2. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara: 45.3%, +26.15
3. Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk: 44.0%, +26.4%
4. San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont: 43.4%, +26.5%
5. Madison: 43.3%, +23.3%
6. Boston-Cambridge-Quincy: 43.0%, +28.8%
7. Raleigh-Cary: 41.0%, +27.7%
8. Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos: 39.4%, +23.0%
9. Denver-Aurora-Broomfield: 38.2%, +22.0%
10. Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington: 37.9%, +23.9%
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 1:45 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
Chicago went through a period of decline, but survived because it was "too big to fail", and now sucks the best and brightest from the whole upper middle part of the country. It begs the question of whether we really need to have as many cities as exist today.
^ I've been asking that for a long time.

Hence I question why certain bloggers, such as "The Midwesterner" or "Urbanophile" keep exploring what we can do to save every little city in middle America.

Why must EVERY city thrive and grow? Why not let some towns decline back into a more rural state while the newer economy coalesces around more prominent urban centers?
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 1:57 AM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
disneypilled verhoevenist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: saint louis
Posts: 11,866
Some of us like living in haunted three story mansard roofed brick houses in haunted cities above haunted caves. Although the Urbanophile has never thrown any love this direction, quite the obviously opposite.
__________________
You may Think you are vaccinated but are you Maxx-Vaxxed ™!? Find out how you can “Maxx” your Covid-36 Vaxxination today!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 1:59 AM
Double L's Avatar
Double L Double L is offline
Houston:Considered Good
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ I've been asking that for a long time.

Hence I question why certain bloggers, such as "The Midwesterner" or "Urbanophile" keep exploring what we can do to save every little city in middle America.

Why must EVERY city thrive and grow? Why not let some towns decline back into a more rural state while the newer economy coalesces around more prominent urban centers?
I totally agree with this!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 1:59 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Well I will say there are two things at play.

One is whether regions or metropolitan areas grow, and I think it's clear that there are some that grew pretty big in the 19th and 20th centuries that don't have any good reason to exist now. That goes for a LOT of smaller Rust Belt cities. The weather isn't great, the natural scenery isn't great, they don't have the critical mass to attract people simply by virtue of what man has built, and their location no longer meets an economic need... so they'll die out.

Then there are metros that are a) pretty big; and b) if not growing, at least holding steady, and it's just the central city that's been in decline. It's reasonable to want to see people from suburban Detroit move back to the city - after all, there are evidently people that want to live in the area, they just don't live in the urban neighborhoods. But that's where the new college grads come in... they have no option but to share an apartment with roommates, whereas families are less likely to relocate no matter what you do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 2:08 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Why must EVERY city thrive and grow? Why not let some towns decline back into a more rural state while the newer economy coalesces around more prominent urban centers?
But, in the Midwest, many of the biggest cities have the biggest population declines. And the smaller Midwestern cities are often growing faster than the bigger cities.

Are you arguing that the biggest cities should be saved, or that the fastest growing cities should be saved?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 2:08 AM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,164
A little unrelated but interesting nonetheless...

The 10 most educated countries in the world
While education has improved across the first world, it has not improved evenly


http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/the...the-world.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 3:49 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,281
Quote:
Richard Kaiser, who graduated from Wright State University, stayed in Dayton because it was cheaper and seemed faster to advance in a career, a choice he does not regret. Friends who moved to Chicago, he said, “ended up sitting at home and drinking cheap beer and playing video games every night
Laughed at this little gem in the article. I think it's more a problem with his friends than this big old city where you can buy cheap tickets to sporting events, have hundreds of bars within walkable distance to actually go out to, and gorgeous lakefront, shopping, theaters etc. You can do all that without breaking the bank.....or I suppose you could sink it all into your gas tank elsewhere.

Full disclosure...I am drinking cheap beer and on ssp but deserve it after a 10 mile bike ride on the lake.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 4:35 AM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
disneypilled verhoevenist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: saint louis
Posts: 11,866
yeah the old "Chicago friends have no fun and wayste money" argument is dead in the water.
__________________
You may Think you are vaccinated but are you Maxx-Vaxxed ™!? Find out how you can “Maxx” your Covid-36 Vaxxination today!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 5:11 AM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
Laughed at this little gem in the article. I think it's more a problem with his friends than this big old city where you can buy cheap tickets to sporting events, have hundreds of bars within walkable distance to actually go out to, and gorgeous lakefront, shopping, theaters etc. You can do all that without breaking the bank.....or I suppose you could sink it all into your gas tank elsewhere.
Yeah. If the most exciting thing you can do in Chicago is video games and beer, the problem isn't Chicago.
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 5:23 AM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
disneypilled verhoevenist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: saint louis
Posts: 11,866
......

Last edited by Centropolis; May 31, 2012 at 4:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 6:20 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,368
I don't really see an endgame to Midwest small-city decline. Even in places like Flint and Youngstown, there are no shortage of people willing to "save the city" and willing to beg their state governments for handouts to forestall the decline with some silver-bullet. Most often, this takes the form of a road project, as if congestion were a serious problem affecting these towns. Since we live in a democracy, this type of redistribution will keep these towns on indefinite life support, the urban equivalent of Terri Schiavo.

In other towns, the trickle of new residents and businesses will continue indefinitely and prevent said towns from becoming abandoned, yet they will never return to their manufacturing-fueled heyday.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 31, 2012, 6:26 AM
Chef's Avatar
Chef Chef is offline
Paradise Island
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post

Chicago went through a period of decline, but survived because it was "too big to fail", and now sucks the best and brightest from the whole upper middle part of the country.
It is worth noting that there are two cities in the Midwest that are above 5% of the national average and neither of them are Chicago. Chicago only sucks the best and the brightest from the rust belt. Only a portion of the Midwest is in decline. Every Midwestern city west of Lake Michigan is average or above average in terms of attracting college grads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.