Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbia
Yes, within this context, you clearly didn't have a clear understanding of the gravity of the situation or their implications. Is that clear enough for you?
EDIT:
Responding to your phantom edit:
I never denied this at a general level, and if you read my post carefully (like word for word) you'll see I acknowledged that they would have had 'some' health workers but clearly not enough (as highlighted in an article on the matter comparing with a vancouver event) and they certainly did not have 17 ambulances. From your link they state, "on-site ambulance." Note that it was singular, not plural.
Within this context, your comment was misleading and unhelpful, and that is because either you wanted to mislead, or you don't understand the medical system. I assumed the latter, but perhaps it was the former.
No. The system was not set-up for 17 people needing hospital care, and ambulances had to be re-directed.
Stuff it yourself.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Didn't mean to phantom edit, accidentally hit post.
Did EMS enter into a red alert status? If not, then I don't see it as being something to get worried about. It wasn't 17 ambulances all at once, it was over the entire event.
How about you stop assuming what I do and do not know from one sentence?
I'm not defending the event or the stupid actions of those involved.
|
Again I come back to we have bigger issues than a festival if our health system is strained by 17 people needing care over a 2 day period. If the ambulance crew has to dedicate significant time to a patient once they reach the hospital than that is a separate issue that needs to be dealt with and isn't specific to Chasing Summer. If redirecting an ambulance from one district to another results in issues we don't have enough ambulances.
The issues that have been identified are systemic issues not issues with Chasing Summer.
And also Suburbia it wasn't 17 at one time, at most there likely would have been 2-3 in use at any given time.