I really hope they don't try to make the Hilton looks like one giant clapboard rowhouse. It doesn't need to look heritage. It is not near any heritage buildings. It should look modern.
If it was proposed to be in the east end of downtown (not that I support highrises in the east end of DT!) then yes it would have to blend in with the heritage buildings around it. But, it will be located in the west end of downtown which we are trying to modernize.
I'm all for preserving the heritage area and the strict rules when building in that area, but the west end of DT needs to be a place for modern structures. Honestly I think the Hilton should look anything but heritage. Here's why..
Does The Delta, 351, Fortis Place, and the Cabot twins look 'heritage'? nope. But it's that contrast of modern and old that makes the heritage area stand out all the more. If we get a few more modern (and dare I say...) taller buildings in the west end , it will create quite an iconic, diverse skyline causing the historic district will shine all the brighter.
I'm not just talking about the hilton, I'm talking about all future buildings in the west end. I don't mind if they hint at our heritage. I just don't want future buildings in the west end to look like supersized row-houses. I would much rather create a beautiful contrast between the new and old, than have a mish-mash of everything everywhere!
Sorry for the rant, just how I feel