HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Shanghai IFC North Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Shanghai Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2006, 8:15 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,508
SHANGHAI | International Finance Center | 858 FT / 260 M | 825 FT / 250 M

This project is now finally under-construction. I'm not sure if they build the two towers at once or phase it. The shorter tower is definitely UC.
Architect: Cesar Pelli


















Last edited by giallo; Mar 28, 2006 at 8:22 AM.
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2006, 2:13 PM
Fabb's Avatar
Fabb Fabb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 9,019
One of my future favourites.
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2006, 2:36 PM
Jularc's Avatar
Jularc Jularc is offline
Time/Space
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,363
Awesome. They are both magnificent!
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2006, 4:25 PM
Fabb's Avatar
Fabb Fabb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 9,019
Weren't they initially supposed to be taller ?
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2006, 7:00 PM
kazpmk kazpmk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 724
^ yea, they were first planned to be a little over 1,000 ft
__________________
America's Tallest UC
Nordstrom Tower, NY 1,550 ft UC 111 West 57 St, NY 1,431 ft UC
One Vanderbilt, NY 1,401 ft UC 30 Hudson Yards, NY 1,296 ft UC
Vista Tower, Chicago 1,1199 ft UC 45 Broad St, New York 1,115 ft UC
9 DeKalb Ave, New York 1,066 ft 53W53, New York 1,050 ft UC
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2006, 7:28 PM
Fabb's Avatar
Fabb Fabb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 9,019
So, the nice rendering is probably not accurate.
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2006, 1:19 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,508
The renderings are current, Fabb. The old design had two towers at 330m opposed to today's three tower complex. I've heard they weren't approved because they totally blocked the Jin Mao from the NW and W of the Bund. It could also be a financial decision.


Here is the old rendering

     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2006, 3:09 AM
jacks jacks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo
The renderings are current, Fabb. The old design had two towers at 330m opposed to today's three tower complex. I've heard they weren't approved because they totally blocked the Jin Mao from the NW and W of the Bund. It could also be a financial decision.
That's a real shame. THe taller buildings would have really stood out, with the pair nicely offsetting the two supertalls. At this height they are in the same region as the line of buildings accross the street from the bank of china down to the development tower. Liu jia zui is going to have a lot of buildings of the same height.
The view blocking argument sounds ridiculous to me. They'll block it from one angle only. At 250m these buildings won't even be visible from the north of shanghai 'cos of the mentioned line of offices by the park and they'll barely poke over the shangri la, aurora line when viewed from the bund.
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2006, 3:37 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,508
^ It does sound ridiculous, so that's why I think it's a financial decision...although I have no proof of this claim.
They will be the third and fourth tallest buildings in Lujiazui by floor height when completed, so it's not all bad.

Last edited by giallo; Mar 29, 2006 at 3:42 AM.
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2006, 7:44 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,508
Apr 11

North side of the site






South side

     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2006, 1:22 AM
Urban Zombie's Avatar
Urban Zombie Urban Zombie is offline
Crisp and Squishy
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kailua-Kona
Posts: 7,825
Can't believe you took pictures in yesterday's fog.

Glad to see this underway.
__________________
As a staunch Marxist, I don't want to belong to any club that would accept me as a member. Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well I have others.
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2006, 2:00 AM
WonderlandPark's Avatar
WonderlandPark WonderlandPark is offline
Pacific Wonderland
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bi-Situational, Portland & L.A.
Posts: 4,129
That is a HUGE site, too bad they didn't go for 300m/1000ft. Looks like L.A. smog.
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2006, 2:03 PM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,508
Apr 20


The site is looking a lot more orderly now

     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2006, 4:06 PM
kazpmk kazpmk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 724
Are both towers under construction or just tower 1??
__________________
America's Tallest UC
Nordstrom Tower, NY 1,550 ft UC 111 West 57 St, NY 1,431 ft UC
One Vanderbilt, NY 1,401 ft UC 30 Hudson Yards, NY 1,296 ft UC
Vista Tower, Chicago 1,1199 ft UC 45 Broad St, New York 1,115 ft UC
9 DeKalb Ave, New York 1,066 ft 53W53, New York 1,050 ft UC
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 12, 2006, 3:34 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,508
^ I'm beginning to think that both will go up at the same time. The site has so many crane cars, cement mixers and workers it's unbelievable. I'd need to shoot a pano to get all the action in one picture.


May 11






     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 12, 2006, 5:11 AM
architect1 architect1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: hamilton soon Toronto
Posts: 412
Wow Nice fricking building.
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 13, 2006, 9:45 AM
Fabb's Avatar
Fabb Fabb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 9,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo
Apr 20

I can't figure out where the footprints are.
Aren't there three groups of cranes instead of two ?
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 13, 2006, 10:06 AM
Jonas's Avatar
Jonas Jonas is offline
fried white rice
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 1,308
Are they already starting the construction?! I though they were scheduled to start for 2008-2009 or so. These are real beauties!
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 13, 2006, 10:11 AM
Fabb's Avatar
Fabb Fabb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 9,019
I, too, was surprised (by the early start and the height reduction).
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 27, 2006, 11:21 PM
kazpmk kazpmk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 724
Actually, It's more likely that only one tower is Under construction. The plan origonally called for the project to be built in phases. Emporis:
"According to the plan the first phase of the project will be completed by the year 2008 with final completion expected for the year 2011."
So this project didn't really have an early start, phase 1 was always planned to be completed by 2008.
__________________
America's Tallest UC
Nordstrom Tower, NY 1,550 ft UC 111 West 57 St, NY 1,431 ft UC
One Vanderbilt, NY 1,401 ft UC 30 Hudson Yards, NY 1,296 ft UC
Vista Tower, Chicago 1,1199 ft UC 45 Broad St, New York 1,115 ft UC
9 DeKalb Ave, New York 1,066 ft 53W53, New York 1,050 ft UC
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.