reading
this yglesias post today led me to this bloomberg quick note:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...ng-bubble.html
it speaks to that weird stat on how vancouverites' household wealth is the highest in canada, and also speaks nicely to how much the banks have done (and how carefully they've done it) to maintain the real estate market over the past years. exploding real estate prices now affect every market in the country, including previous immune areas (quebec, rural new brunswick, etc). the mind-bending number of condominium projects on the boards in toronto, the 350% 10-year increase in real estate prices in regina, montreal's market exceeding the pre-olympic construction boom of 1976 - you line up this activity with capacity and population shifts and you get this shudder of terror, a dumbstruck feeling, like slow-motion vertigo.
it's not that we're a cascade of defaulted loans away from a really serious price correction, but more that maintaining current prices requires either that a) canadians moving into ownership take on an increasingly high level of debt (which, since wages haven't increased anything like enough to meet housing inflation, would mean either lower lending standards and/or a greater reliance of co-signatories in lieu of collateral); or that b) investor capital continues to flow into real estate at steadily increasing levels. neither of those seems like something especially promising to bank on, and at any rate, the longer an unsustaible cycle continues, the more painful the eventual correction, so the canadian government and the bank of canada will probably try to cool the market little by little.
whatever happens, it's a terrible time to invest in real estate, broadly speaking, though vancouver is almost certainly less exposed to severe price-shock than somewhere like regina or lethbridge, or even the ring of cities surrounding toronto.
(the shudder of terror is for skyscraper afficionados, obviously)