HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 6:40 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,124
The Midwest, where millenials go to retire!

perusing realtor.com this morning, i was looking at their 2017 housing forecast and their 2nd prediction was midwest cities will be hotbeds for millennial homebuyers. Specifically...."Midwestern cities are anticipated to continue to beat the national average in millennial purchase market share in 2017 with Madison, Wis.; Columbus, Ohio; Omaha, Neb.; Des Moines, Iowa; and Minneapolis, leading the pack. This year, average millennial market share in these markets is 42 percent, far higher than the U.S. average of 38 percent. With strong affordability in 15 of the 19 largest Midwestern markets, realtor.com® expects this trend to continue in 2017 even as interest rates increase".....so does that mean the dream of the 90s is no longer the pacific northwest, but rather the midwest? Portland seems to have effectively priced bohemia out of the city limits and word on the street is the Ohio valley and Great Lakes is the new hotness for young creatives. This makes me pleased. Discuss!
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.

Last edited by pdxtex; Mar 28, 2017 at 11:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 6:44 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,408
Question for Chicago/midwest friends on this board: why isn't Chicago growing? It seems to have all the urban amenities that coastal cities offer + low prices. Whats going on?

I went there once few years ago and loved it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 6:46 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,782
^ it's a tale of two cities.

global chicago IS growing.

but ghetto chicago is emptying out even faster.

and the mexican immigation deluge that fueled chicago's surprising growth in the '90s has greatly slowed.


it's the same shit as last decade when downtown chicago grew faster than any other US downtown, but the city still lost 200,000 people overall.

the good in chicago keeps getting better, the bad in chicago keeps getting worse, and there's still just more bad than good overall. it's a GIANT city.

if i were the head of a working class family living in a neighborhood like austin or auburn gresham, i'd try to get the fuck out of chicago too.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Mar 28, 2017 at 7:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 6:49 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,124
Chicago's central, white population is growing but its middle class black population is declining rapidly. I think were seeing that trend happen in other northern industrial ciites also. The great migration is effectively reversing and northern blacks are moving back to the south or making lateral moves to safer regional cities.
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 7:25 PM
dave8721 dave8721 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,043
It just means millennials are buying in those markets (because they can) while renting in more expensive coastal markets.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 7:36 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,802
Realtor.com presumably doesn't say that lots of millennials are moving to the Midwest, though they're apparently staying in larger numbers in some cases. The point is that the millennials who are there can buy there more easily than the typical millennial in more-expensive places.

Edit: Dave said it better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 7:50 PM
eschaton eschaton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave8721 View Post
It just means millennials are buying in those markets (because they can) while renting in more expensive coastal markets.
That's how I read the data too. In addition in many of these cities the housing stock probably trends more towards single-family housing and less towards apartments. This means, all other things considered, owning will not only be cheaper in absolute terms, but cheaper in relative terms compared to renting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 8:16 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
if i were the head of a working class family living in a neighborhood like austin or auburn gresham, i'd try to get the fuck out of chicago too.
Yeah, I know a guy named Barack who seems to have done it. But I don't understand. I was born and raised in DC and burbs. I fled from THERE.
__________________
Rusiya delenda est

Last edited by Pedestrian; Mar 28, 2017 at 8:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 8:20 PM
maru2501's Avatar
maru2501 maru2501 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,668
most of the country doesn't really get Chicago, which is fine, since we don't get most of the country
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 8:27 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Two kinds of people seem to be moving TO the midwest and rustbelt towns: Midlife and retiring people who never cared much for the amenities of coastal cities so loved by so many at this web site (often because they lived in the suburbs or outer reaches of the city and never went downtown) and who recognize that they can live well on a much lower income in the midwest, and a few (operative word few) urban pioneering millennials attracted to the challenge of places and neighborhoods struggling to improve. The biggest challenge for the latter group is finding a job in a place that is just getting off the economic mat. The former, of course, can do what they do because they aren't any longer working or do the kind of work you can find anywhere. But I think the majority of millennials are still attracted to the most glamorous, successful cities; not the struggling ones.
__________________
Rusiya delenda est
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 8:34 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by maru2501 View Post
most of the country doesn't really get Chicago, which is fine, since we don't get most of the country
Let me tell you: I "get" it. I've been there a number of times. I enjoyed my trips a lot. More than once I've said to myself, "Self, imagine what you could get in Chicago for what this SF place is worth."

But then I remember my several shopping tours of Michigan Ave in January--mostly hopping from one store to another to get inside out of the frigid temps and biting wind. And, of course, in summer I read about the killer heat waves every few summers and remember the sweltering lifestyle of growing up in DC before A/C.

And I move on.

Chicago is a good town. I'm glad it has people who appreciate it and I know there's a lot to appreciate. But there are deal-breakers for me.
__________________
Rusiya delenda est
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 8:46 PM
Emprise du Lion Emprise du Lion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 338
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChargerCarl View Post
Question for Chicago/midwest friends on this board: why isn't Chicago growing? It seems to have all the urban amenities that coastal cities offer + low prices. Whats going on?

I went there once few years ago and loved it.
Chicago proper has growing white, Hispanic, and Asian populations, but that growth is virtually canceled out due to the sheer number of African Americans leaving the city.

I'd also bet that Chicagoland overall would still be growing were it not for the ongoing budget impasse that's gripped Illinois for nearly 2 years now. It's had dire consequences across the state, and there is currently no end in sight.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 8:49 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,124
all those cities mentioned are far from struggling though, they have low unemployment, low crime (for the most part) and low housing costs. that's like the magic combination. but yeah, there might be some pioneers trying to make a go of it Covington, KY or Lansing. Detroit was a top 20 market last year too, wow! Average home sale was 200k. *tilts head*....that's definitely news....but you guys are right, they aren't specifying where these millenials are moving from, so they are probably either former renters or from in state for the most part.
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 9:10 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
Two kinds of people seem to be moving TO the midwest and rustbelt towns: Midlife and retiring people who never cared much for the amenities of coastal cities so loved by so many at this web site (often because they lived in the suburbs or outer reaches of the city and never went downtown) and who recognize that they can live well on a much lower income in the midwest, and a few (operative word few) urban pioneering millennials attracted to the challenge of places and neighborhoods struggling to improve. The biggest challenge for the latter group is finding a job in a place that is just getting off the economic mat. The former, of course, can do what they do because they aren't any longer working or do the kind of work you can find anywhere. But I think the majority of millennials are still attracted to the most glamorous, successful cities; not the struggling ones.
This couldn't be further from the truth. Actual demographic trends are that rich, white millenials are flooding into Midwestern inner cities. They are also joined by some boomers migrating to downtown for a "downsizing". However, retiring boomers are a sizable chunk of the population that is leaving. This has been ongoing from decades much as it do for large parts of the country where people migrate to Florida and Arizona to die. The largest demographic leaving midwestern rust belt cities is African American in what is, as someone else said, essentially a reversal of the great migration. The change that is happening in several parts of Chicago right now is downright astonishing. It's almost entirely due to milennials returning to the core en masse. Then there are your midsized midwestern towns like Des Moines or Madison that people move to for school or a first job and never really have a reason to leave. The winter is bad, but your quality of life is way higher across the board for a much lower cost than just about anywhere else on earth.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 9:22 PM
IWant2BeInSTL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
Two kinds of people seem to be moving TO the midwest and rustbelt towns: Midlife and retiring people who never cared much for the amenities of coastal cities so loved by so many at this web site...
eye roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
...(often because they lived in the suburbs or outer reaches of the city and never went downtown)...
eye roll



my favorite amenity is the lack of smug.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 9:40 PM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,512
^^^

I for one appreciate the amenity of not living in the ring of fire, that would be a huge "deal breaker" for me.
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 9:51 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,802
I've heard nothing about "rich, white millenials are flooding into Midwestern inner cities," unless we have very different definitions of both "rich" and "flooding."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 9:55 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
I've heard nothing about "rich, white millenials are flooding into Midwestern inner cities," unless we have very different definitions of both "rich" and "flooding."
the loop gained nearly 50k people between 2010 and 2015. i think the gentrification trends we see on the coasts are finally catching up to interior markets also. i was looking at real estate in my hometown (ann arbor) and its like Portland prices out there. they're building luxury townhomes and loft conversions that are going for 700k. wow! say it with me now, Washtennnnaw!! doesn't that sound sexy? but yeah, Midwestern population graph aren't 45% degree angles, they are more like 5 percent slow and steady trickles. anyone around here from upstate new York? Rochester and buffalo seem intriguing, especially buffalo...but there is definitely coastal quality growth happening at the metro level in some ciites, oklahoma city grew by 8 percent in that same time, indy, minneapolis and columbus all grew by 5% also. that's pretty good for the snowy cradle of hellllll. if you consider Nashville the Midwest, they grew by nearly 10 percent. eh, its pretty close.
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.

Last edited by pdxtex; Mar 28, 2017 at 10:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 10:06 PM
maru2501's Avatar
maru2501 maru2501 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,668
the only people moving TO san francisco are panning for gold or hoping to slide out of a saloon and catch work constructing the new "cable-car" system
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 10:32 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Funny coming from a Portlander...
__________________
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." - Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:02 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.