HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2018, 5:17 PM
AndrewK AndrewK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 451
For more context on the Civic Center Hotel (though the closing date has since been pushed back):

http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2...-approval.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2018, 5:41 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
this doesn't look closed to me

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2018, 6:36 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbad View Post
this doesn't look closed to me
now it does

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2018, 10:11 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,552
Notice of Hearing for December 6, 2018

I saw this notice today in he window on the Market Street side of the building:

10 South Van Ness - Notice
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2018, 10:47 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
It's good to see that they're still considering a single taller tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2018, 1:12 PM
MyCitySFO MyCitySFO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: South Bay
Posts: 89
A single tower at 610 feet would be awesome in that area. But my gut feeling is that it will the shorter 420 foot twin towers. I hope I'm wrong.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2018, 2:41 PM
dimondpark's Avatar
dimondpark dimondpark is offline
Pay it Forward
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Piedmont, California
Posts: 7,889
Wow this thread is 4 years old...youd think by now itd be farther along...
__________________

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference."-Robert Frost
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2018, 6:21 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyCitySFO View Post
A single tower at 610 feet would be awesome in that area. But my gut feeling is that it will the shorter 420 foot twin towers. I hope I'm wrong.
My gut feeling is the same as yours, in which case we’re going to have a definite table top effect in that area, with at least four to five towers around the same height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2018, 10:44 PM
fimiak's Avatar
fimiak fimiak is offline
Build Baby Build
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
Wow this thread is 4 years old...youd think by now itd be farther along...
The Market Street Hub EIR wont be done until Winter 2019 (one year plus until certification).
__________________
San Francisco Projects List ∞ The city that knows how ∞ 2017 ∞ 884,363 ∞ ~2030 ∞ 1,000,000
San Francisco Projects ThreadOakland Projects ThreadOceanwide Center - 275M/901'
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2018, 1:42 AM
biggerhigherfaster biggerhigherfaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
Wow this thread is 4 years old...youd think by now itd be farther along...
It could easily be another four (at least). Expect another recession before this thing is scheduled to break ground, which will lead to the project being put on hold until the next business cycle
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2019, 8:28 PM
amvion amvion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 4
On December 6, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for 10 South Van Ness. The final certification is expected to come in April with final project approval in July 2019.

Next Thursday, January 17th, the commission will hold an informational meeting on the most recent proposal.

Here is a link to the presentation from SF Planning:

10 South Van Ness Plans

The presentation contains the most recent images.

The project would require amendments to the Planning Code and General Plan in order to allow for the greater height development, which is expected with the adoption of the Hub-area plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2019, 7:39 AM
1977's Avatar
1977 1977 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 996
Thanks for that, amvion!

I'm glad planning is leaning towards the single/taller tower. Looking forward to this one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2019, 7:10 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Plans for a Single, Taller 984-Unit Hub District Tower Picked
January 14, 2019

. . . with the anticipated passage of San Francisco’s Hub District Plan, which would up-zone the corner for development up to 600 feet in height, Crescent Heights is now formally proposing to pursue the single tower design . . . .

The 55-story tower would yield the same number of (slightly larger) residential units and retail space (30,000 square feet) as the two-tower design, but with around 240 off-street parking spaces as now envisioned (versus 518 as originally proposed) and an enclosed mid-block pedestrian connection between Market and 12th Street, the sidewalk for which would be widened and specially paved.

And with the support of San Francisco’s Planning Department, the preferred plan will be presented to the San Francisco’s Planning Commission on Thursday, with the hopes of having the project’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR) certified this April and securing the project’s approval circa July.



http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2...er-picked.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2019, 11:13 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,552
amvion - thanks for the update! If the building looks like the plans presented it will a great addition to the intersection which now is boring & unattractive now. The intersection demands a building of quality. With the current high cost and shortage of labor I wonder how many years before we will see this building completed.

I looked at the document presented to the city to see if BART was mentioned, and yes, briefly on the last page. As noted before by me the BART tunnel turns south under the property which is why the high rise portion is set back from Market Street.
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 6:31 AM
1977's Avatar
1977 1977 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 996
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 4:34 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
In the meantime, the existing building had new signage stretched over the metal framing, new LED lighting installed all the way down 12th Street, and other minor improvements have been made, so it looks like it might be around for a while.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 5:07 PM
pseudolus pseudolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1977 View Post
Did they drop the checkerboard window glass that made it look like the Jack Tar Hotel?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 10:15 PM
hruski hruski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 165
Nema is 350 feet tall and this building is listed at 400 feet, but the rendering makes it look double Nema's size. Something isn't right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2019, 4:40 AM
1977's Avatar
1977 1977 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 996
Quote:
Originally Posted by hruski View Post
Nema is 350 feet tall and this building is listed at 400 feet, but the rendering makes it look double Nema's size. Something isn't right.
This is the 600 foot version which was the SF planning's preferred version.

Quote:
And with the anticipated passage of San Francisco’s Hub District Plan, which would up-zone the corner for development up to 600 feet in height, Crescent Heights is now formally proposing to pursue the single tower design, as rendered by Handel Architects below, as their preferred plan for moving forward.

And with the support of San Francisco’s Planning Department, the preferred plan will be presented to the San Francisco’s Planning Commission on Thursday, with the hopes of having the project’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR) certified this April and securing the project’s approval circa July.
https://socketsite.com/archives/2019...er-picked.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2019, 6:09 AM
SLO's Avatar
SLO SLO is offline
REAL Kiwi!
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California & Texas
Posts: 17,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1977 View Post


Spectacular rendering, this building is tall enough to stretch the skyline...
__________________
'Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*ck things up' - Barack Obama
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:01 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.