Quote:
Originally Posted by tworivers
Would love to know the backstory on this. Could be a hardball negotiating tactic, obviously. I wonder how much skyrocketing building costs are affecting the negotiations. I'd imagine that this might be a situation where the IZ policy ends up being a shot in our own foot -- a local developer told me a few weeks ago that Trump's tariffs had pushed the price of steel that they needed to buy from $2500/ton to $5000/ton.
|
Building materials costs are broadly rising. Lumber futures have doubled in the last three years. Steel futures ditto. Specific types of lumber or steel may have increased more.
The report makes it sound like the infrastructure to be provided by the city is the main sticking point. Or rather a gap in its financing.
"But ultimately, the cost of building a street grid, parks and other infrastructure might have proven too large. The city had in 2015 pledged $23.7 million in public dollars to cover those costs, but recent negotiations had revealed "a gap," said Shawn Uhlman, a Prosper Portland spokesman.
"At this point, it was something that we were not willing to cover," Uhlman said. "
Or, as mentioned in the other thread, it could be cold feet given we're near the end of a development cycle with so much new housing supply recently delivered and in the pipeline.
In the Oregon Square thread, I asked what do the South Waterfront developers know that AAT in the Lloyd does not. If AAT cannot find an economic way forward at this time for a worthy project on their parcel, how are the Ziddels (and whoever is supposedly going to do the fantasy Kumo towers) finding a way?
I like to think that the Post Office development is different, because there will be more office, the city is more committed to it, and it is earlier stage.