HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #521  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 5:10 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
>~< , QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: South Loop, Chicago
Posts: 1,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjp View Post
I hope this development plus the post office redevelopment prompts the city to improve the Clinton blue line station. It's pretty dingy as-is.
Yeah and it should have a Canal Street exit if possible. Direct office to the post office would be even better (and I think would allow covered access to Union Station as well via a platform).
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead. Trump delenda est.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #522  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 5:27 PM
jpIllInoIs's Avatar
jpIllInoIs jpIllInoIs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 995
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV View Post
Yeah and it should have a Canal Street exit if possible. Direct office to the post office would be even better (and I think would allow covered access to Union Station as well via a platform).
IIRC the OPO and CUS train platform redesign includes a pedestrian tunnel to Clinton Station from OPO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #523  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 5:49 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjp View Post
They have a pretty big operations center in Naperville.
Ok, didn't realize that. What do they do there?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #524  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 7:38 PM
Donnie77 Donnie77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 200
[QUOTE=spyguy;8405848]

I love the way the building seems to levitate.

That appendage needs to be redesigned because it looks lazy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #525  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 10:40 PM
Skyguy_7's Avatar
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by jc5680 View Post
If you are talking about the hue differences on the faceted portion of the rendering it almost certainly is not different glass color; that is just light and shadow.

To that end, silver glass is just going to look blue anyways. Unless it has a very strong color profile most glass going to look blue in a ton of lighting conditions. Hand wringing over blue glass is pretty pointless in that regard.
That would be great if it’s light and shadow, much like the design of the west facade on 110 N Wacker, but judging by where the glass meets the “column trees”, it appears flush throughout.

Regarding my hand wrignging over the blue glass, I’m just envious of all the facade treatments that NYC’s boom is seeing . Silver, black, clear, bronze, terra cotta...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #526  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 12:24 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
I'm so happy they got rid of those awkward X-braces. The V braces look way better. This building taking out the worst parking garage in downtown makes this one of the best projects of the cycle, and that's whether or not the glass is mixed between black and silver/clear
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #527  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 1:18 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
Life enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Barcelona, NYC, California
Posts: 4,075
Ooh I love it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #528  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 1:52 AM
bnk's Avatar
bnk bnk is offline
પટેલ. કે ન
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 10,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
I'm so happy they got rid of those awkward X-braces. The V braces look way better. This building taking out the worst parking garage in downtown makes this one of the best projects of the cycle, and that's whether or not the glass is mixed between black and silver/clear
V braces might look better than X braces but from a engendering view point there are too many stresses on the mid V sections unless there is a thick steel I beam headers above the pic to alleviate that.
But even a thick header does not explain the lack of support at all 4 corners of the building unless the core is taking the load and it is just a cantilever building.

One should not put stresses in the middle of the V without making them worthy of the load.

IMO There has to be an unseen component of those Y braces from the top from prevent them from buckling the Y braces from expanding outward.


We wont know the real details and may never will unless someone has blueprints. But I am sure that it is compensated because no firm would do such a thing taking esthetics over form and function if it was not 300 years safe. But the pic looks unstable from the perspective of a lay viewer.

You just can't get away from downward and outward pressure on a V triangle brace in the middle if it is not mitigated and I am sure it will be but the pics do not show the beefing up needed.








The more I look at the pic the more I see the core handling down pressure and it being a cantilever building and the outside supports are just flourish unlike the JHC building that needed X braces for function alone.
__________________
facebook

Last edited by bnk; Dec 13, 2018 at 2:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #529  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 2:56 AM
Ned.B Ned.B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnk View Post
V braces might look better than X braces but from a engendering view point there are too many stresses on the mid V sections unless there is a thick steel I beam headers above the pic to alleviate that.
But even a thick header does not explain the lack of support at all 4 corners of the building unless the core is taking the load and it is just a cantilever building.

The more I look at the pic the more I see the core handling down pressure and it being a cantilever building and the outside supports are just flourish unlike the JHC building that needed X braces for function alone.
I'm not following all of this. The triangle sections can easily be supported at the midpoint in an invisible fashion because there is a whole floor structure to brace them right there. The corners are only 25' cantilevers, which is not out of the range of possibility, especially if there is a hanger coming down from the nearest corner column above. A lot of buildings omit the corner supports as you can more efficiently do a half bay cantilever and have corner offices without a column.

And the serrated curtainwall appears to be real, versus an applied pattern as you can see the profile reflected in the edge of the cantilever's ceiling.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #530  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 3:07 AM
Skyguy_7's Avatar
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,312
^I see it now. Thanks. Going to be beautiful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #531  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 3:25 AM
jc5680's Avatar
jc5680 jc5680 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago—West Loop
Posts: 1,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
^I see it now. Thanks. Going to be beautiful.
This is now redundant I suppose; in case others aren't sure you can see the folds in the glass along the lobby ceiling and angular shadows where the column trees span the folded glass. As spyguy noted, quite viceroy like.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #532  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 2:51 PM
pilsenarch pilsenarch is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnk View Post
V braces might look better than X braces but from a engendering view point there are too many stresses on the mid V sections unless there is a thick steel I beam headers above the pic to alleviate that.
But even a thick header does not explain the lack of support at all 4 corners of the building unless the core is taking the load and it is just a cantilever building.

One should not put stresses in the middle of the V without making them worthy of the load.

IMO There has to be an unseen component of those Y braces from the top from prevent them from buckling the Y braces from expanding outward.


We wont know the real details and may never will unless someone has blueprints. But I am sure that it is compensated because no firm would do such a thing taking esthetics over form and function if it was not 300 years safe. But the pic looks unstable from the perspective of a lay viewer.

You just can't get away from downward and outward pressure on a V triangle brace in the middle if it is not mitigated and I am sure it will be but the pics do not show the beefing up needed.








The more I look at the pic the more I see the core handling down pressure and it being a cantilever building and the outside supports are just flourish unlike the JHC building that needed X braces for function alone.
these really aren't structural "V"'s, the architects just haven't chosen to represent any of the horizontal structure architecturally (also commonly referred to as floors which are indeed cantilevered at the corners)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #533  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 3:04 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
I'm not following. RBC has nothing to do with Harris Bank.

Bob could have also just kept it to BMO, as they are also anchoring a new building in downtown Milwaukee.....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #534  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 3:13 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon07 View Post
What I like most about it is that it will beef up the SW loop skyline. I think it will really pop when you are driving West on 94 (really north in that spot) that section of the loop can use some more towers to bulk things up a bit.

Same....that’s my favorite part as well. GP does fine work, and the details will be nice....it will likely be a nice, well-executed tower in its own right....however they’re repetitive af and I’d be fine with going a decade without another new GP office tower downtown after this one.....frankly, part of the reason I’m looking forward to Salesforce Tower so much is that it’s not designed by GP. (That and judging by how PCP’s neighboring WPE is shaping up, it’s likely going to be very sharp as well).
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #535  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 3:38 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,647
I am dubbing this the World Wide Web building due to it being impossible to not see WWW in the bracing after you notice it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #536  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 4:14 PM
Ned.B Ned.B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 515
Maybe they are upside down BMO insignias
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #537  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 6:57 PM
rgarri4's Avatar
rgarri4 rgarri4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 465
It would be cool if the v shapes continued up the building instead of straightening out. Oh well. Interesting base boring everything else.
__________________
Renderings, Animations, VR
https://vizfire.net/
My 3d model of Chicago:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...wpost&t=230331
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #538  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 10:54 PM
SpireGuy's Avatar
SpireGuy SpireGuy is offline
Making Chicago Memorable.
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
That would be great if it’s light and shadow, much like the design of the west facade on 110 N Wacker, but judging by where the glass meets the “column trees”, it appears flush throughout.

Regarding my hand wrignging over the blue glass, I’m just envious of all the facade treatments that NYC’s boom is seeing . Silver, black, clear, bronze, terra cotta...
You hit it right on the head. This tower is repetitive and banal. Chicago is not innovating the next generation of towers. NYC is doing that with the silver, black, clear, bronze, and terra cotta. At the very least, wouldn't it be great if they used bronze mullions on this tower? Blue and silver is already so sterile and cold. With our winters we could use some warmth in our buildings and diverse textures.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #539  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 5:00 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnk View Post
V braces might look better than X braces but from a engendering view point there are too many stresses on the mid V sections unless there is a thick steel I beam headers above the pic to alleviate that.
But even a thick header does not explain the lack of support at all 4 corners of the building unless the core is taking the load and it is just a cantilever building.

One should not put stresses in the middle of the V without making them worthy of the load.

IMO There has to be an unseen component of those Y braces from the top from prevent them from buckling the Y braces from expanding outward.


We wont know the real details and may never will unless someone has blueprints. But I am sure that it is compensated because no firm would do such a thing taking esthetics over form and function if it was not 300 years safe. But the pic looks unstable from the perspective of a lay viewer.

You just can't get away from downward and outward pressure on a V triangle brace in the middle if it is not mitigated and I am sure it will be but the pics do not show the beefing up needed.








The more I look at the pic the more I see the core handling down pressure and it being a cantilever building and the outside supports are just flourish unlike the JHC building that needed X braces for function alone.
You seem to be overlooking the simple fact that the support structure can go well underneath street level...
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #540  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2018, 5:21 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
Life enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Barcelona, NYC, California
Posts: 4,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpireGuy View Post
You hit it right on the head. This tower is repetitive and banal. Chicago is not innovating the next generation of towers. NYC is doing that with the silver, black, clear, bronze, and terra cotta. At the very least, wouldn't it be great if they used bronze mullions on this tower? Blue and silver is already so sterile and cold. With our winters we could use some warmth in our buildings and diverse textures.
It could have been more interesting I guess but I love the last rendering. The facade and lobby look really cool, and I'm digging the purple ish-color
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:18 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.