HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4921  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 11:50 AM
elly63 elly63 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,890
Interest in NHL wanes while Blue Jays creating new followers, survey shows
Chris Zelkovich Eh Game April 8/2016

As a rule, a team's following generally increases with winning and declines with losing.

According to a new survey, that is the case with Canada's NHL teams and the Toronto Blue Jays. But the Toronto Raptors and Canada's Major League Soccer teams are not benefitting at all from success on the court and on the pitch.

The poll, completed by Project Canada Surveys, shows that NHL interest among Canadians has dropped from to 40 per cent who said they followed it ``very closely" or ``closely" as all seven Canadian-based teams failed to make the playoffs this year. That's down from the level of 46 per cent that has remained steady since the last lockout ended in 2013.

The poll of 1,500 Canadians was conducted by University of Lethbridge sociologist Reginald Bibby on April 1-2.

It also shows:

Flagging interest in the NHL is most pronounced in Montreal and Vancouver, with fan bases in the other cities not noticeably affected by their teams' poor performance. This mirrors an Angus Reid poll showing that 54 per cent of those polled plan to watch less post-season action this year.

Interest in Major League Baseball has risen dramatically from 35 to 49 per cent in Toronto thanks to the Blue Jays, but only 25 per cent of Canadians follow the sport. "Defying the claim that the Jays are 'Canada’s Team,' the interest level in baseball in the rest of the country has not increased from what it was a year ago," Bibby noted.

Despite their third straight NBA division championship, the Raptors have seen their following in Toronto drop from 29 to 28 per cent. Nationally, they've barely made a dent in the minds of Canadians, with interest static at 12 per cent.

Interest in the Canadian Football League has dropped slightly, from 26 to 24 per cent, but remains ahead of the NFL (22 per cent), which saw its following drop by one percentage point.

Interest in the MLS remains stuck at the 2013 level of 9 per cent nationally. The Vancouver Whitecaps are drawing the most interest (18 per cent) in their home city, while Toronto and Montreal have a following of 13 per cent at home.

Compared with the NFL, the CFL has similar numbers of fans under the age of 55, but it has a greater following among adults 55 and older. NBA and MLS fans are disproportionately young, creating hope for more growth in the future.

Not surprisingly, the CFL has its strongest following in the west (with a high of 47 per in Saskatchewan and Manitoba) and weakest in the east (with only 9 per cent in Atlantic Canada, 19 per cent in Quebec and 20 per cent in Ontario.)

The survey's findings jibe with television ratings. Audiences for the NHL are down 16 per cent across the country this season while Blue Jays ratings are breaking records.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4922  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 12:00 PM
elly63 elly63 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,890
Toronto loves the Blue Jays, but other Canadians just aren’t that into them
Peter Hadzipetros National Online Journalist Global News April 8

Marcus Stroman might be onto something. The Toronto Blue Jays starting pitcher says Toronto is a baseball city.

Stroman made the comment in The Players’ Tribune, an online forum founded by former New York Yankee star Derek Jeter to connect professional athletes with fans.

A new poll suggests Stroman might be right. At least when it comes to Toronto.

The Project Canada 2016 Sports Survey – carried out by sociologist and trend-tracker Dr. Reginald Bibby of the University of Lethbridge – found that 49 per cent of Toronto sports fans “very closely” or “fairly closely” follow the Blue Jays. That’s up from 35 per cent last season, when the Jays caught fire in the middle of the season and made the post-season for the first time since they won back to back World Series in 1992 and 1993.

While the Jays are the sports focus in Toronto, the numbers suggest they are far from Canada’s team.

On a national level, the Blue Jays are closely followed by 25 per cent of people surveyed, barely ahead of those who follow the Canadian Football League. Outside of Ontario, fewer than 20 per cent of people surveyed said they followed baseball.

Torontonians prefer baseball to hockey

And it suggests that the Blue Jays are now more popular than the Toronto Maple Leafs.

The survey found that hockey interest in Toronto dipped marginally from 44 per cent last season to 43 per cent this year, well behind the numbers recorded for baseball’s Blue Jays. Toronto’s hockey support has barely budged even though the Leafs haven’t won the Stanley Cup since Lester Pearson was prime minister. The Maple Leafs have appeared in the playoffs only once since the 2003-04 season.

Overall, the survey suggests that in a year that all seven of Canada’s teams were shut out of the playoffs, fewer Canadians are following the NHL than they were three years ago – but the sport is still king when it comes to fan support.

The survey found that the proportion of Canadians following the NHL has slipped to 40 per cent from 46 since 2013.

Disenchantment with hockey was highest in Montreal and Vancouver.

Last year, 51 per cent of people surveyed said they followed the Montreal Canadiens. This year, that’s fallen to 39 per cent. The Canadiens had their best start to a season ever this year, winning their first nine games. But they faded quickly after star goaltender Carey Price suffered an injury in late November. He missed the rest of the season. The Canadiens have not won a championship since the 1992-93 season.

In Vancouver, 49 per cent of people surveyed said they followed the Canucks last year. This year, that fell to 40 per cent. Vancouver has never won a league championship but the team has made it to the finals three times since joining the league in the 1970-71 season.

The survey also found that the die-hard fan bases in other NHL cities have hardly been affected. In Alberta interest fell from 48 per cent last year to 41 per cent this year. In Manitoba and Saskatchewan, support went up from 38 per cent in 2015 to 45 per cent this year.

Other Toronto sports teams not too popular outside Ontario

The survey also found that – outside Toronto – the Raptors of the National Basketball Association are followed by about 12 per cent of people surveyed. Despite three consecutive division championships, the team scores well behind the Blue Jays and Leafs in fan support in the Toronto market at 28 per cent.

Major League Soccer trails the pack with nine per cent of those surveyed saying they follow the league’s three Canadian teams: the Montreal Impact, Toronto FC, and Vancouver Whitecaps.

The survey also found that – by far – men are more likely to follow men’s professional sports than women, usually by a ratio of two to one. However, when it comes to football, that ratio increases to three to one.

The Project Canada 2016 Sports Survey was carried out online April 1-2. A total of 1,509 people were surveyed online. A probability sample of this size carries an error range nationally of +/- three percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4923  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 12:33 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,169
No real surprise in those numbers. I know here in Regina there are lots of fair weather Blue Jays fans, but also hard core fans of many other MLB teams.

For me, I was a hard core Expos fan and a casual Blue Jay fan. The incessant pushing of Toronto sports teams (except the Argos) down the rest of Canada's throat by the national media has personally turned me off of Toronto sports teams. I don't know about anyone else though, I might just be unique!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4924  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 12:43 PM
elly63 elly63 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN View Post
The incessant pushing of Toronto sports teams (except the Argos) down the rest of Canada's throat by the national media has personally turned me off of Toronto sports teams. I don't know about anyone else though, I might just be unique!
You are not. To me it also shows that the Raps and TFC have failed to gain a national following, inhibiting their growth. TFC though is "vying" for that visibility with two other teams though, which helps explain their minimal national following.

I definitely don't see the Jays sustaining those big numbers, one bad season from them and a good one by the Leafs will put the Jays back in national prominence with the CFL
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4925  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 1:07 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
'...but also hard core fans of many other MLB teams.'

Really? Seems unusual...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4926  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 1:47 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Awesomesauce View Post
'...but also hard core fans of many other MLB teams.'

Really? Seems unusual...
Nope, now I'm showing my age here but when cable TV first hit the prairies one of the stations was WGN from Chicago. They showed all of the cubs games unlike the one or two Jays/Expos games we would get per week. Quite a few people became big cubs fans and have stayed that way. Of course there are Yankee and Red Sox fans and quite a few Cardinal and Twins fans as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4927  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 2:01 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
The Twins have run a pretty strong second to Toronto in terms local rooting interest in Winnipeg. They're the closest MLB team and a good number of Winnipeggers make the trip down to watch games at Target Field.

When I was younger I liked the Jays but the older I get the less sense it makes to me as to why the rest of the country is supposed to cheer for Toronto's teams by default.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4928  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 6:40 PM
elly63 elly63 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,890
Top hockey producer’s firing before NHL playoffs hints at Rogers turmoil
DAVID SHOALTS The Globe and Mail Apr. 08, 2016

An Angus Reid Institute poll has driven an exclamation point into what executives at beleaguered Rogers Media already know – most Canadians will not be watching the NHL playoffs this spring.

But at Rogers, the blood was already on the floor thanks to the fact that none of the seven Canadian NHL teams will be in the playoffs for the first time since 1970. On Tuesday, the man in charge of hockey production at Sportsnet and Hockey Night in Canada, senior vice-president Gord Cutler, was fired. Before that, several staffers in the hockey department were laid off.

While company insiders said Cutler’s dismissal was a financial move since he was undoubtedly hired away from rival Bell Media’s TSN two years ago with a healthy salary, the timing was extraordinary. No one could remember a network firing its head of production with the NHL playoffs days away.

The move hinted at the turmoil in Rogers Media, which has seen even more ratings trouble in the second season of its $5.2-billion, 12-year contract with the NHL for the national Canadian broadcast rights. While Cutler cannot be held responsible for a 16-per-cent decline in Hockey Night In Canada ratings through late March, which follows a 16-per-cent decline in the first year of the deal from the 2013-14 season, CBC’s last year broadcasting the show, his departure is a sign there may be unhappiness with the on-air product at the highest level of Rogers, even above Sportsnet president Scott Moore and Rogers Media president Rick Brace.

A Rogers spokeswoman said Moore would not be available for comment until later this week.

When ratings do not reach the projections given to advertisers, broadcasters have to give their clients free commercial time as compensation, known as make-goods. The problem for Rogers is that the loss of viewers is so severe that it has to give out far more make-goods than was planned.

One source in the advertising industry and one in the broadcast industry say the free spots, two of which are being given for every paid ad, have eaten up a significant portion of Rogers’s playoff hockey inventory. This means there is much less to sell to paying clients, which further hurts revenue when Rogers usually would expect to sell playoff advertising at a significant premium. The company is putting some make-goods on its Toronto Blue Jays broadcasts and entertainment shows, and that, too, cuts into the sales of advertising time.

“It is kind of grim, but unlike the fairy tales, it is reality,” said the advertising source, who requested not to be identified because of a business relationship with Rogers.

Hockey fans’ unhappiness has been building since late January, when all seven Canadian teams started wobbling. Of the 1,522 Canadian adults Angus Reid surveyed from March 28 to 31, 54 per cent said they planned to watch either less of the NHL playoffs than they did a year ago or none.

Only 30 per cent of the respondents said they plan to watch the same amount they did in 2015. Nineteen per cent said they will watch no playoff hockey, while 35 per cent said they will watch less than a year ago. All of the respondents said they usually watch the playoffs. The full results of the survey, released on Thursday, are on Angus Reid’s web site.

The trouble signs for Sportsnet began at the start of the 2015-16 NHL season thanks to the network’s unexpected success story, the Toronto Blue Jays. According to multiple sources, some major advertisers took advantage of provisions in their contracts with Rogers that allowed them to switch their commercials from the hockey broadcasts to the Blue Jays as they went on their run through the baseball playoffs in October.

According to another advertising source (who also requested anonymity because of direct dealings with Rogers), some companies could do this, but they had to pay a premium, because the Jays were getting audiences of three million or more.

Another source said the audience numbers for hockey reached only 77 per cent of the projections Rogers gave advertisers in the fall of 2015.

Rogers was also hit by a drop in ratings for its conventional shows on its City channels and specialty networks such as OLN, the source said. This makes it difficult to satisfy advertisers who demand a certain audience level for make-goods on those channels. It also eats into the advertising inventory for those shows.

Broadcasting insiders have suggested Rogers could get some revenue relief by selling games from its national package to TSN. However, a source close to senior management at TSN said the network, which remains profitable, is not interested in buying any NHL games.

This is not surprising given the ratings tumble for Rogers. By late March, the average audience for the early game on Saturday’s Hockey Night In Canada was down to 1.66 million from more than 1.9 million in 2014-15. When the biggest driver of hockey ratings, the Toronto Maple Leafs, were competitive, audiences for those games routinely exceeded two million.

However, the largest audience for a Leafs game between Jan. 3 and April 2 was the 1.8 million who watched on Saturday, Jan. 23. That may look good compared with this season’s average, but it was against the Montreal Canadiens, a matchup that used to draw more than two million viewers. By April 2, the viewers were down to 826,500 on both the CBC and City for a game between the Leafs and another strong rival, the Detroit Red Wings.

Moore acknowledged the problems of poor ratings and falling advertising revenue caused by the Canadian teams’ lacklustre play in a recent memo to Sportsnet staff. He also mentioned layoffs, part of Rogers’s announcement a few months ago of 200 job losses, that hit the hockey department for the first time. But he did not draw a direct link between the Canadian teams and the layoffs.

However, Sportsnet staffers see the connection and it has not been good for morale. This was compounded by Cutler’s firing, which came long after Moore’s memo. There is much fear at the network about more layoffs once the hockey season is over.

“There’s tons of concern about that,” one Rogers employee said. “That’s all anybody talks about.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4929  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 6:41 PM
elly63 elly63 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,890
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4930  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 1:33 AM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
Yikes! I have a strong feeling the Canadian Premier League will have a high level of entertainment value. The highlights from the USL 3rd division game between Montreal and Toronto showed the young prospects and local academy products playing with skill, speed and flare higher than their 1st teams just a few years ago.
__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4931  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 8:11 PM
elly63 elly63 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,890
Bombers win big financially, scoring $11 million profit
Paul Wiecek winnipegfreepress.com 04/11/2016

The Winnipeg Blue Bombers hit the jackpot in 2015, posting a profit in excess of $11 million thanks to both a financially successful season and hosting the Grey Cup.

The club announced Monday they recorded a net profit of $7.1 million from hosting the Grey Cup at Investors Group Field last November. And team sources say the club will also announce on Wednesday that they posted a larger operating profit on the 2015 season than they did in 2014.

The Bombers posted a $3.9 million operating profit in 2014, meaning the club’s combined profit from 2015 will be comfortably into eight figures, a monstrous payday for a CFL team.

While a $4.5 million mortgage payment on the new stadium and $1.5 million in stadium improvements that were done prior to the Grey Cup need to be subtracted from that number, that still means the Bombers will bank over $5 million from the 2015 season towards a rainy-day fund.

The Bombers will formally release their 2015 financial report on Wednesday.

"It was a big year," Bombers CEO Wade Miller said in an interview Monday. "The Grey Cup was a huge success that took a ton of dedication from the committee, the 500 volunteers that were involved, the Grey Cup staff and the Bombers staff.

"We pushed hard for 18 months leading up to the game and it all paid off."

The $7.1 million profit from hosting the 2015 Grey Cup is more than double the $3.2 million the club earned the last time they hosted the Grey Cup in 2006.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4932  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 8:34 PM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,580
Quebec City mayor meets IOC president in Switzerland to discuss Olympics bid
Quote:
Labeaume has also expressed interest in sharing the games with another city, such as Lake Placid, Calgary or Vancouver.
Quote:
It included, among many initiatives, plans to encourage cheaper, more flexible bids to attract more host cities.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montre...-ioc-1.3529877
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4933  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 9:54 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
So it looks as though streaming live sports is the way of the future. It may not mean that MLS's overall viewership is likely on par with other sports in Canada but the demography of their target viewing audience probably allowed them to make the transition to streaming earlier.


Quote:
The N.F.L Has Seen The Future, And It Is WWE Wrestling

9 April 2016
New York Times
Joe Nocera

What got me thinking about WWE’s business model was the news earlier this week that the N.F.L. had sold the streaming rights for 10 Thursday night games to Twitter for a reported $15 million. At first glance, Twitter is an odd choice. It has about a fifth the number of users Facebook has and, unlike Facebook, it is struggling to find ways to increase profitability. What’s more, the reported $15 million Twitter is paying for the games — which will also be shown on NFL Network and either CBS or NBC, depending on the game — is loose change for the N.F.L., with its multibillion television contracts and estimated $13 billion in annual leaguewide revenue.

But strategically at least, what the N.F.L. is doing is not all that different from what WWE has done with its digital app. With more and more people watching movies and television shows that are streamed to digital devices rather than shown via traditional platforms like cable and satellite, the N.F.L. is preparing for the day when the same is true for live sports.

Right now, live sports are the single most important reason the transition from traditional television to online streaming isn’t happening even faster. There are advertisers who will air commercials only during live events, which mostly means sports; they know that many viewers will avoid ads by seeking out their favorite shows on on-demand streaming services. And there are many viewers whose desire to watch sports is the only thing keeping them from cutting the cord.

But the N.F.L. isn’t in the business of propping up traditional television’s business model; it’s in the business of getting people to watch football games. And when the day comes that most of them prefer to have those games streamed, well, the N.F.L. wants to be ready.

Complete Article
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4934  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 3:54 PM
elly63 elly63 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,890
CFL adopts device for fixing officiating errors quickly
Mike Florio profootballtalk.nbcsports.com April 7, 2016

In 2016, the CFL will be doing something that the NFL needs to be doing, too. But the NFL needs to go even farther.

Via the Canadian Press, the Canadian Football League has added a video official, with the goal of correcting blatant officiating mistakes quickly. The video official will operate from the CFL’s command center in Toronto, monitoring the action from a feed that shows the entire field.

The expectation is simple: The video official will be asked to fix obvious errors that cannot be challenged via the replay review system.

The CFL also has expanded the universe of plays that fall within the normal replay review function to include offensive pass interference, illegal contact, roughing the passer or kicker, and other previously non-reviewable plays. In 2014, the CFL made defensive pass interference reviewable.

The NFL has resisted making pass interference reviewable, based on the notion that interference is a judgment call. Still, officials can make significant and clear errors when determining whether interference did or didn’t occur; why not allow it to be fixed?

As to the use of a video official, the better approach would be to assign a video official to each officiating crew in each stadium, helping spot mistakes and consulting with the referee as a first look — not as a second, after-the-fact review. The replay function would still be available, but an in-stadium official watching the game the same way that millions watch it at home would have a pipeline to the referee, with the ability to tell the referee what the HD images show.

Why should the video official who has the benefit of seeing what the fans see have any say in the crafting of rulings? For starters, the video official wouldn’t primarily be trying to avoid being run over by a much young, larger, and stronger person. Wearing armor.

With each passing year, the NFL becomes a bigger deal — and the outcome of each and every game becomes more important, too. The biggest challenge for the NFL currently is to bridge the gap between what a handful of officials see at field level versus what millions of viewers see at home.

The sooner that happens, the better off the sport will be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4935  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 4:01 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 13,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Awesomesauce View Post
'...but also hard core fans of many other MLB teams.'

Really? Seems unusual...
That anyone cares about baseball here?

I follow the Cardinals, but I lived in St. Louis for a few years so they became my team.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4936  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 4:06 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Sawmill Billowtoker
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 13,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeInMyShoes View Post
That anyone cares about baseball here?

I follow the Cardinals, but I lived in St. Louis for a few years so they became my team.
My dad is a life-long Cards fan from the days when Cardinals games would be broadcasted on the radio back in the 50s and 60s.
__________________
The Colour Green
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4937  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 4:44 PM
TownGuy's Avatar
TownGuy TownGuy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Cobourg, ON
Posts: 3,070
Rogers handling of HNIC has been horrible and everyone expected it. They've got games all over the place, different announcers all over the place, Strombo still isn't a good fit for hockey, and will never be. There used to be a familiarity with HNIC but that's all gone now. I also can't stand that new camera they like to use which takes you further away from the game.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4938  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2016, 6:48 AM
SaskScraper's Avatar
SaskScraper SaskScraper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Saskatoon/London
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
TV viewership was likely strong because nobody wanted to travel to Swift Current to attend . Curling attendance at events in Canada has been trending downwards for the past decade or so.

It's funny that the women's worlds are watched with such high ratings given the fact that Canada has gone nearly a decade without winning the event.
Is that the same reason spectator attendance for the 2016 Brier in Ottawa was down 30% from the last time it was held in Ottawa, because no one wanted to bother going to Ottawa to see it?
Considering the size of Swift Current, being only the 7th largest community in Saskatchewan and the percentage of volunteers needed to put on the successful event, Swift Current did a great job yet again holding a World Championship event. I'd like to see Ontario's 7th largest community do the same, twice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4939  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2016, 2:08 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaskScraper View Post
Is that the same reason spectator attendance for the 2016 Brier in Ottawa was down 30% from the last time it was held in Ottawa, because no one wanted to bother going to Ottawa to see it?
Considering the size of Swift Current, being only the 7th largest community in Saskatchewan and the percentage of volunteers needed to put on the successful event, Swift Current did a great job yet again holding a World Championship event. I'd like to see Ontario's 7th largest community do the same, twice.
I enjoy the insinuation that I take offence to your comments about Ontario and Ottawa as if I take it personally.

First off, Swift Current was a Worlds event, whereas Ottawa was a National event.
Secondly, as i've posted before, spectator numbers (in terms of attendance) have been falling, and falling, for curling events for the past 15 years or so. Saskatoon's Brier went from 248K in 2000 to 177K in 2012. Calgary's Brier went from 245K in 2002 to 152K in 2015. These drops make Ottawa's 30% reduction look pretty good by comparison. What happened to 71,000 spectators in Saskatoon between 2000 and 2012? Or the 93,000 spectators in Calgary between 2002 and 2015? I think fewer people are willing to travel.

As a comparison, Ontario's 19th largest municipality (Kingston) hosted a Women's Nationals and had 66K attendance in 2013, higher than Swift Current's 52K - but i'm not sure what this has to do with anything because when you're comparing population numbers between Saskatchewan and Ontario the former is always going to lose to the latter.

Besides, Ottawa is going to be an easier draw for visitors than Swift Current, and there were plenty that were staying at hotels downtown and taking public transit down to Lansdowne for the event. Hats off to Swift Current for hosting an international event but you're trying to compare apples to oranges with the two.

Swift Current's numbers were lower than Lethbridge for the same event in 2012 but higher than Saint John in 2014. However, Swift Current's numbers (for a Worlds) were lower than the Women's Nationals numbers for Moose Jaw, Prince George, Sudbury, Brandon, Kitchener...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4940  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2016, 2:52 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
I think the fact that the worlds were held in Swift Current speaks to what a television-centric event it has become, kind of along the lines of televised darts, billiards or what have you. It's not unlike those Grand Slam of Curling events that are held in small curling clubs with no more than a few hundred fans watching in person, meanwhile there are hundreds of thousands watching on Sportsnet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.