HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2101  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 4:27 AM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop Gate, Chicago
Posts: 934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bombardier View Post
wt
Don't worry Bombardier, I know you called the Cube. Cheers!
     
     
  #2102  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 11:24 AM
Freefall Freefall is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV View Post
I wonder where 800 units ranks in terms of apartment buildings in Chicago. I know Presidential Towers has over 2000 units, but that's split over 4 towers...
Downtown it'll be second. Citywide I believe it'll be third. 655 W Irving Park has 901 units. One Superior Place has 809 units.
     
     
  #2103  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 1:48 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,132
It's surprising to me that the highest units have southern views instead of skyline/park views. They decided to favor sunlight over views?
     
     
  #2104  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 4:34 PM
Ricochet48 Ricochet48 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freefall View Post
Downtown it'll be second. Citywide I believe it'll be third. 655 W Irving Park has 901 units. One Superior Place has 809 units.
Immediately thought of Superior as I almost lived there. Grand Plaza has 764 (including the 283 condos that are mostly rented anyways), Wolf Point East is 700, both Optima's combined are 815, similarly both Old Town Parks are 833 together.

South Loop has added NEMA, Essex, The Paragon, The Cooper, Eleven40, an Alta, and a several smaller complexes in such a short time. Are there enough young pros willing to pay $2.5K/mo for a 1BR in SL, guess we will see?

Still excited to see how NEMA looks in the end. Thus far it really compliments the Sears Tower and adds some much needed weight / balance to that corner of Sloop.
     
     
  #2105  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 4:45 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freefall View Post
Downtown it'll be second. Citywide I believe it'll be third. 655 W Irving Park has 901 units. One Superior Place has 809 units.
i thought Outer Drive East (400 E Randolph) was the largest single residential building in the city with 955 units.

or are we restricting the conversation to strictly rental properties?
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
     
     
  #2106  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 5:36 PM
Barrelfish Barrelfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
i thought Outer Drive East (400 E Randolph) was the largest single residential building in the city with 955 units.

or are we restricting the conversation to strictly rental properties?
Interesting that so many of the highest unit-count buildings in the city are such minor presences in the skyline and don't "feel" that big (400 E Randolph, 1 Superior). I lived in 655 W Irving Park for a summer, and while it's a big building and significantly bigger than anything else around, it never crossed my mind that it might be one of the biggest apartment buildings in the city. I'm glad NEMA will add some more skyline presence and architectural flair to the top end of that list.

Side note, when 400 E Randolph was built in 1963, it was the world's largest apartment building. Now it gets lost in the shuffle of Lakeshore East. How times change.
     
     
  #2107  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 5:59 PM
Freefall Freefall is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
i thought Outer Drive East (400 E Randolph) was the largest single residential building in the city with 955 units.

or are we restricting the conversation to strictly rental properties?
Ah yes, looks like 400 E is the largest. Never realized it was that dense.
     
     
  #2108  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 3:21 AM
Bombardier Bombardier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by PittsburghPA View Post
Don't worry Bombardier, I know you called the Cube. Cheers!


The crane gave it away... no one would spend the money to extend the crane that high without a good reason!
     
     
  #2109  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 3:44 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bombardier View Post


The crane gave it away... no one would spend the money to extend the crane that high without a good reason!
I have never been happier to be wrong than I was about the faux height fiasco/drama
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
     
     
  #2110  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 9:59 AM
Neuman's Avatar
Neuman Neuman is offline
The Moon Rulez! #1
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northside
Posts: 151
PT has 2,346 units in total.
__________________
Alright, when I say your name, you say 'here.' And we will assume 'here' is short for 'here I am...rock you like a hurricane. -Ignignokt
     
     
  #2111  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 5:16 PM
cozy cozy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 434
is the cube going to be re-enforced concrete??? what are those pillars they are working on in latest pics? that would be so cool
__________________
Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized.
     
     
  #2112  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 5:32 PM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
Soooo, what would probably be the most sought after views of the park/city at the top, they have made the core? I’m sure it all makes sense for the elevators, but seems like valuable real estate to put up fake windows on concrete.
     
     
  #2113  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 6:10 PM
jc5680's Avatar
jc5680 jc5680 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by cozy View Post
is the cube going to be re-enforced concrete??? what are those pillars they are working on in latest pics? that would be so cool
If you go by the rendering, the pillars are for the 5 remaining 'floors' left, not a cube

     
     
  #2114  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 6:23 PM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop Gate, Chicago
Posts: 934
Why wouldnt they continue the floor formwork if they were adding floors and not just columns? Not trying to be argumentative just generally curious.
     
     
  #2115  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 6:44 PM
jc5680's Avatar
jc5680 jc5680 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by PittsburghPA View Post
Why wouldnt they continue the floor formwork if they were adding floors and not just columns? Not trying to be argumentative just generally curious.
The rebar sticking up for the columns follows pretty typical cadence, its just you can see it with screening from the north side removed. Floor formwork usually comes after the columns are poured. Also, since the core is done, that formwork is no longer needed.

That also assumes there is even floor slabs at this point though. Since the elevator doesn't go to these last 'floors' they could effectively just be an elaborate screen for mechanicals or a damper or both.

Last edited by jc5680; Jan 19, 2019 at 2:39 AM.
     
     
  #2116  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 7:18 PM
cozy cozy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten View Post
Soooo, what would probably be the most sought after views of the park/city at the top, they have made the core? I’m sure it all makes sense for the elevators, but seems like valuable real estate to put up fake windows on concrete.
correct me if im wrong, but there are certain mechanical elements of a residential skyscraper that have to be installed above everything else, and all skyscrapers have them. as much as the developers would love to sell all that space it isn't possible
__________________
Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized.
     
     
  #2117  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:04 PM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
^true enough, but 5+ floors of mechanical? I can’t say for sure since it’s not my industry, but it seems like a lot of space. Also, I believe real windows are on the East, South, and West walls.
     
     
  #2118  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:52 PM
jc5680's Avatar
jc5680 jc5680 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten View Post
^true enough, but 5+ floors of mechanical? I can’t say for sure since it’s not my industry, but it seems like a lot of space. Also, I believe real windows are on the East, South, and West walls.
A tuned mass damper could justify that space. The one in Taipei 101 occupies that much space.

Not sure if we ever heard about the finalized design, but bvic posted way back about a sloshing damper that needed at least 2 floors.
     
     
  #2119  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2019, 1:17 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Jan 16



__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #2120  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2019, 1:23 PM
skyscraper skyscraper is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by jc5680 View Post
A tuned mass damper could justify that space. The one in Taipei 101 occupies that much space.

Not sure if we ever heard about the finalized design, but bvic posted way back about a sloshing damper that needed at least 2 floors.
last I heard, it doesn't have a tmd, but it does have a 2-story slosh tank at the top.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.