Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG
um surrey is right on the fraser river and the ocean
its city centre isn't near the water perhaps but its on the river
|
You're right, but I meant that the downtown core is not built around water like most large cities - Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto, Halifax, Victoria, London, Berlin, New York, Chicago, even Mississauga, Seattle, Calgary - the list goes on forever. The Surrey geography is somewhat similar to that of Hamilton (city centre some distance from the waterfront) - except that Hamilton's waterfront is more or less evenly split between recreational and industrial zoning. Perhaps if more could be done with the Bridgeview neighborhood, and some sort of residential development on the river could take place (without, of course, impinging greatly on the river's transportation/shipping value), that would suffice. It is a little overwhelming to have most of the Scott Road area consist of greyfields and brownfields. I've been to that tiny little park between the two bridges, and wonder if that could be part of a larger waterfront network - connected, perhaps, to high density residential zoning to the east.
Having said that, key to the latest Economic Development Strategy for the city is to retain existing industrial lands so as to avoid having to build factories and warehouses on valuable (and ever-decreasing) agricultural land.
. . .in which case, I'm not sure the Fraser will quite fulfill what I had in mind above. The land will most likely be used for industry.
Not that it's absolutely imperative that there be some body of water in Surrey - Just a pipe dream of mine, nothing more.