HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3421  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2018, 6:37 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
They will all jump ship. Even Ferguson, who has supported since the beginning, said he only supported it because it was a billion dollar investment. He said if there was a billion dollars to spend on anything he would want to do something else. Maybe Farr, Johnson and Green (who's fault it is for screwing this) will stick with LRT.

It would be more prudent to show Ford how much money would go down the shit pipe by changing the plans now. Not that Rob cared when he dumped most of Toronto's LRT the day he took office. Still, Doug has shown that he's not against the plan and he's willing to keep the money on the table. The best hope is that he can be convinced of Council's ineptitude to better allocate the money themselves (shouldn't be hard) and that his fiscally conservative nature can be leveraged to see the waste in abandoning a project where the money has already been spent.
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3422  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2018, 7:53 PM
HillStreetBlues HillStreetBlues is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: KW/Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 995
The problem with that is that Ford is not truly a fiscal conservative. He doesn't care about balancing the provincial budget, for instance, and has already said that the billion dollars is Hamilton's to keep- which is misguided, obviously.

None of it is about saving money or managing the provincial budget responsibly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3423  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2018, 3:38 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
In 1995, the newly-elected Conservative government cancelled the Eglinton West subway project without any concern for the related costs for doing so, and it was further along in development. They actually buried the portion of the tunnels that had already been bored
__________________
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul"
-George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3424  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2018, 3:52 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,883
Another new #HamOntLRT rendering to share - check out the conceptual design for the LEED Silver certified Operations, Maintenance & Storage Facility, which will be located near Longwood. #HamOnt


Hamilton LRT
https://twitter.com/HamiltonLRT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3425  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2018, 8:39 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is online now
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,522
So that would be along a new Frid St. connection (the residential streets in the background from L to R are the west ends of Herkimer, Stanley and Homewood, with Macdonald and Linwood running cross-wise)

I'd be surprised if they didn't keep one of the existing rail spurs for delivery of the trains right into the facility (unless there will be some kind of provision for offloading from the main track that leads into CP's Aberdeen yard)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3426  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 4:22 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,021
https://www.thespec.com/news-story/8...e-transit-hub/

McMaster University approves budget for $100-million Cootes Drive transit hub

Realignment of Cootes Drive, including new and modified entrances to McMaster University campus, is being discussed as part a $100-million transit hub planned for the corner of Cootes and Main Street West.

McMaster’s board of governors approved the capital budget for the project at its April meeting. Work is scheduled to begin on the 200,000- square-metre hub for GO Transit and HSR buses — plus student and commercial spaces — in 2019 and will continue in three separate phases until 2024. The total budget, which is funded by Metrolinx as part of a $1-billion Hamilton LRT from McMaster to Eastgate Square, is $100,131,000. The hub will replace the existing parking lot.

The project would move campus vehicle access to Cootes Drive, while other existing entrances, including Main Street West, will have a pedestrian focus.

University director of communications Gord Arbeau confirmed realignment of Cootes Drive and new or modified entrances from the four-lane road to campus are being considered.

“Other traffic management matters are being reviewed and considered as part of those discussions,” Arbeau said. “There is an opportunity with LRT and with the transit hub project to consider improvements to traffic management and flow.”

The western terminus of the planned LRT route is to be located in the middle of Main Street West, near Cootes Drive.

“The goal is to facilitate ease of connection, allowing the community to quickly and comfortably move from HSR and GO buses to the LRT and vice-versa,” Arbeau said.

City of Hamilton and HSR staff did not respond to a request for information about any HSR bus routes that would be rerouted to create a link to McMaster’s hub.

In September 2016, HSR staff said they were considering extending the existing Dundas local bus to the McMaster transit hub. There will be no public parking available at the hub, so the Dundas bus that currently links Watson's Lane to Pleasant Valley could provide a Dundas link to the transit hub — GO buses and LRT — via South Street, Osler Drive and Main West to Cootes Drive.

Details of the transit hub were first released in November 2016, as part of the university’s updated campus master plan.

The plan included a second vehicle entrance to campus from Cootes Drive, at College Crescent, between an existing pedestrian controlled stoplight and Main Street West.

McMaster, Metrolinx and the city have not yet determined if the traffic lights — put in after a student was struck and killed by a truck on Cootes — will be removed or not.

The campus master plan calls for a new pedestrian focus for the Main Street entrance, moving the majority of vehicles, including buses, to Cootes Drive.

Because the entire project is being paid for by Metrolinx, the provincial government agency is responsible for the redesign of Cootes Drive and vehicle access to McMaster University. City staff had no comment on the project, and its impacts on Cootes Drive.

Metrolinx spokesperson Vanessa Barrasa said more details of the Cootes Drive realignment and other elements of the project will be shared as they are confirmed.

by Craig Campbell
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3427  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 7:18 PM
mishap mishap is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 313
200,000 square metres? The writer should check the number of zeroes. That's two million square feet. Or More than double the square footage of Lime Ridge Mall (just the building).

Edit: Just converted that number, and that is equal to forty-nine acres!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3428  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 7:40 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by mishap View Post
200,000 square metres? The writer should check the number of zeroes. That's two million square feet. Or More than double the square footage of Lime Ridge Mall (just the building).

Edit: Just converted that number, and that is equal to forty-nine acres!
The picture has 200,000 sq.ft quoted. Which is 18,500 sq.m.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3429  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 7:48 PM
mishap mishap is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 313
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRitsman View Post
The picture has 200,000 sq.ft quoted. Which is 18,500 sq.m.
And they still haven't corrected the body of the article...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3430  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 9:14 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,263
Pretty sure they could not build 200,000 sq m for $100MM , but would be awesome and massive if they did so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3431  
Old Posted May 5, 2018, 2:46 AM
realcity's Avatar
realcity realcity is offline
Bruatalism gets no respec
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Williamsville NY
Posts: 4,059
TV City is three times that investment.. That would be awesome /\. I think secretly City Staff wants the Greenbelt relaxed. Could you imagine the sprawl? Caledonia is Vaughan.
__________________
Height restrictions and Set-backs are for Nimbys and the suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3432  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2018, 4:41 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,883
Donna Skelly is now an MPP, so that's one less anti-LRT on city council. However, she'll be at Queen's Park, the one who is writing the cheque.

If this fails then all of the blame should be squarely directed towards to Matthew Green, with his political stunt to delay the release of the RFP to pander to his labour unionist to ensure HSR runs the LRT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3433  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2018, 5:40 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,756
Skelly is a lot more dangerous at Queens Park than she was at council.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3434  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2018, 2:16 PM
LikeHamilton's Avatar
LikeHamilton LikeHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 2,704
From today's "Raise the Hammer"

Anti-LRT Candidate Accidentally Emails Secret Plan

It appears Ward 1 candidate Carol Lazich accidentally blind-copied the other candidates on an email detailing her plan to have anti-LRT material distributed through an intermediary.

By Ryan McGreal
Published August 24, 2018

Anti-LRT activist and Ward 1 candidate Carol Lazich appears to have accidentally emailed every other municipal candidate with a secret plan to have an associate distribute anti-LRT propaganda to the candidates.

Lazich is the leader of the "No LRT Hamilton" group and has a long history of circulating false and misleading claims to undermine the LRT project. An email was sent out from c.lazich1@gmail.com on Friday, August 10, 2018 at 8:26 PM to another anti-LRT activist who works at a print shop.

The email was a request to "send out some NO LRT info" to "a master list of all candidates" once the anti-LRT material is ready. The email also ordered the recipient to remove Lazich's name from the material before sending it out: "You will need to delete my name from this email as this CAN NOT come from me as otherwise I am screwed!!"

However, instead of sending the list of candidates to the recipient, Lazich seems to have accidentally pasted the list of candidates into the BCC field of the email, blind-copying it to everyone.

Read more!

http://www.raisethehammer.org/articl...ls_secret_plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3435  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2018, 2:40 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by LikeHamilton View Post
From today's "Raise the Hammer"

Anti-LRT Candidate Accidentally Emails Secret Plan

It appears Ward 1 candidate Carol Lazich accidentally blind-copied the other candidates on an email detailing her plan to have anti-LRT material distributed through an intermediary.

By Ryan McGreal
Published August 24, 2018

Anti-LRT activist and Ward 1 candidate Carol Lazich appears to have accidentally emailed every other municipal candidate with a secret plan to have an associate distribute anti-LRT propaganda to the candidates.

Lazich is the leader of the "No LRT Hamilton" group and has a long history of circulating false and misleading claims to undermine the LRT project. An email was sent out from c.lazich1@gmail.com on Friday, August 10, 2018 at 8:26 PM to another anti-LRT activist who works at a print shop.

The email was a request to "send out some NO LRT info" to "a master list of all candidates" once the anti-LRT material is ready. The email also ordered the recipient to remove Lazich's name from the material before sending it out: "You will need to delete my name from this email as this CAN NOT come from me as otherwise I am screwed!!"

However, instead of sending the list of candidates to the recipient, Lazich seems to have accidentally pasted the list of candidates into the BCC field of the email, blind-copying it to everyone.

Read more!

http://www.raisethehammer.org/articl...ls_secret_plan
Smh.

WHY are people so against LRT? I understand the politicians using it for political gain, however scummy it is. But why is there such a large movement against it?? I still fail to get my head around it. It is clearly a good thing when people have to resort to scummy fear tactics to get their point across.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3436  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2018, 3:53 PM
eatboots eatboots is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 243
Part of it is that a billion dollars is being spent downtown, which A LOT of people in different parts of Hamilton think is a garbage hole. There is definite resentment that money isn't being spent elsewhere even if it doesn't really make any sense. The other big butthurt is that the freeways that pass through the city will be slowed down. They are horrible for the people that live near them but very convenient for driving to or from the 403 to anywhere else in the city.

Also, how much money is being spent by trucking companies or other businesses that have a vested interest in keeping things as they are? That is unknown but is definitely happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3437  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 1:07 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,883
Metrolinx stops buying LRT land citing provincial spending freeze
Transit agency says the temporary halt in land acquisition for 14-km line will continue “pending further government direction.”

https://www.thespec.com/news-story/8...ending-freeze/

Metrolinx has stopped buying land needed for Hamilton's planned $1-billion LRT citing a discretionary spending freeze ordered by the new provincial government.

It's not clear what the decision means for landowners and tenants in the path of the 14-kilometre lower city light rail transit line — especially those in the middle of suddenly suspended negotiations.

The former Liberal government announced full capital funding in 2015 for Hamilton's planned LRT. The 14-kilometre route from McMaster University to Eastgate Square requires the purchase of 80 full buildings and project head Metrolinx has already spent $45 million on 45 properties.


But Memphis Cadeau said an LRT project official told her this week Metrolinx could not make a purchase offer or pay for an updated appraisal on her Main Street East building because of a provincewide "audit freeze" initiated by the new Progressive Conservative government.

The news was particularly galling for Cadeau because she had just listed the Grim City Tattoo Club building to gauge its market value after unproductive back-and-forth with Metrolinx over sale prices.

She said a project official immediately contacted her to say she should note Metrolinx' interest in the property in her real estate listing — while simultaneously admitting the agency could not make a purchase offer. "I feel like they wanted to prevent us from selling our building at fair market value," she said.

But Cadeau also asked what will happen to building owners or tenants who may have already agreed to leave but have yet to negotiate compensation for damages, moving expenses and relocation costs. "What do you tell your tenants now?" she asked.

Metrolinx spokesperson Jamie Robinson confirmed Wednesday the agency has "temporarily paused" new property purchases and related spending because of provincial "direction on discretionary spending."

He said the agency is "honouring our commitments with property owners where an agreement has already been reached pending closing, or where terms of an agreement have been negotiated in good faith."

Robinson couldn't say how long the purchasing pause might last, other than that it will continue "pending further government direction."

One of the first directives issued by Ontario's new Progressive Conservative government headed by Premier Doug Ford was to freeze hiring and discretionary spending until it could get a closer look at the state of Ontario's finances.

Those efforts are supposed to include detailed audits of provincial spending in an effort to balance the budget and finding $6 billion in unspecified savings promised during the recent election campaign.

Robinson could not immediately say why the agency classified property purchases under the approved, funded project as "discretionary" spending. (The Spectator is also waiting for comment from provincial treasury board officials on what is included in the spending freeze.)

New Tory MPP Donna Skelly said the temporary halt in property purchases is in keeping with the provincewide spending directive. But she also stressed the "funding commitment remains" for the project.

Robinson also emphasized spending related to the ongoing project RFP has not stopped. (Three pre-qualified consortiums are working on bids to design, build and operate the line, but a contract is unlikely to be awarded before mid-to-late 2019.)

Kris Jacobson, the city's LRT director, said any "discretionary protocol" has so far not affected Hamilton staff in their role in the joint project office, which is provincially funded. "Our technical team, community engagement, it's all still moving forward," he said.

The controversial LRT continues to be dogged with political uncertainty, despite the ongoing procurement process and about $105 million already spent on staffing, property acquisition, design and project studies.

Ford said during the provincial election he would give Hamilton council the choice of sticking with the LRT or using project funding for other infrastructure priorities. That promise has set up light rail transit as a key municipal election issue ahead of the Oct. 22 vote.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3438  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 10:50 AM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,808
This obviously isn't good, but everything depends on what council we end up with.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3439  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 11:12 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
It could be killed by either government. The PC's already lied and shafted Hamilton about $12 million on the basic income pilot. I trust Ford and Skelly as far as I can throw them, which is not very far.
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3440  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 10:40 PM
johnnyhamont's Avatar
johnnyhamont johnnyhamont is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,115
For what it's with going forward, I'm pretty happy with council re LRT. By my count:
5 councillors + Mayor (6) = Pro LRT
6 councillors = conditional support for LRT
4 councillors = opposed

Mayor Eisenberger - pro LRT

Ward 1 - Maureen Wilson - Pro LRT
Ward 2 - Jason Far = Pro LRT
Ward 3 - Nrinder Nann - pro LRT
Ward 4 - Sam Merulla - pro LRT
Ward 5 - Chad Collins - conditional
Ward 6 - Tom Jackson - conditional
Ward 7 - Esther Pauls - conditional
Ward 8 - Danko John-Paul - pro LRT
Ward 9 - Brad Clark - opposed
Ward 10 - Maria Pearson - opposed
Ward 11 - Brenda Johnson - opposed
Ward 12 - Lloyd Ferguson - conditional
Ward 13 - Arlene Wanderbeek - conditional
Ward 14 - Terry Whitehead - conditional
Ward 15 - Judi Partridge - opposed

So for critical votes, focus efforts on getting at least 2 or 3 of the conditional folks to vote for LRT. Barring any major surprises from the province, I'd be shocked if council voted down LRT with this group around the table
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.