HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


    Skye Halifax I in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Halifax Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #421  
Old Posted May 11, 2012, 11:19 AM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is online now
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,318
What I find odd about the twin tower design for Skye is that one side of both towers will be looking directly over to the other tower, and those units won't have very good views. Considering the size of the development is it smart to have so many units which will have undesirable views? Who would want an apartment on the 40th floor that looks right over to the other tower?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #422  
Old Posted May 11, 2012, 12:00 PM
statbass statbass is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St. John's
Posts: 1,650
I can't say I really like the design of this building, but from looking at the renderings when placed in with existing buildings I think a development of this magnitude would look great in downtown Halifax. Plus 150m - that'd be a landmark for the entire Atlantic region!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #423  
Old Posted May 11, 2012, 2:35 PM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Leblanc View Post
What I find odd about the twin tower design for Skye is that one side of both towers will be looking directly over to the other tower, and those units won't have very good views. Considering the size of the development is it smart to have so many units which will have undesirable views? Who would want an apartment on the 40th floor that looks right over to the other tower?
There are horrible views from many units in the Paramount.

I think the 40th floor for all the units, including those facing the other tower, would be fantastic. The towers are slim enough that there will still be plenty of view, especially since the building's design includes large windows for all units.

Aside from having better views than what most units in the Paramount offer -- the rent in Skye will be cheaper. They are aiming for the university student market. And students are poor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #424  
Old Posted May 11, 2012, 6:25 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Leblanc View Post
What I find odd about the twin tower design for Skye is that one side of both towers will be looking directly over to the other tower, and those units won't have very good views. Considering the size of the development is it smart to have so many units which will have undesirable views? Who would want an apartment on the 40th floor that looks right over to the other tower?
It is a very constrained site on a small lot partly covered by a severe height restriction. Their options are somewhat limited.

I'm not really sure why they didn't go with a single tower though. The original proposal had one condo tower and one hotel tower. In the new version, both are condo.

I agree with others that it may not be that likely that these will be built, but nobody really knows at this point and it is interesting to watch the proposal play out. I think it's positive that people are debating the merits of a tower of this size. Halifax can be a conservative town and some people like to dismiss opportunities simply because they're new and different. I hope that in the future the city can move away from that and start to look at new development with an open mind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #425  
Old Posted May 13, 2012, 3:10 PM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
I see that a wind study has been done for this proposal - http://www.halifax.ca/planning/docum...Assessment.pdf

The case number for the Skye proposal is 17446 and it has a webpage on the halifax.ca site - http://www.halifax.ca/planning/Case17446Details.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #426  
Old Posted May 14, 2012, 5:10 AM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
we built this city
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,801
In 30-40 years those renderings will be the equivalent of the "future Halifax" ones from the 1970's.

These towers will never get built, not to those specs at least.

I wonder after the Waterton debacle if this company will still exist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #427  
Old Posted May 14, 2012, 9:01 AM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Though I don't think United Gulf will commit to building Skye Halifax, I'm willing to bet that the proposal will get approved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #428  
Old Posted May 14, 2012, 5:16 PM
resetcbu1's Avatar
resetcbu1 resetcbu1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyeJay View Post
Though I don't think United Gulf will commit to building Skye Halifax, I'm willing to bet that the proposal will get approved.
If so, maybe they could sell the development rights? not sure how that works but I bet if it were approved and able to be sold alot of intrest over such a landmark development....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #429  
Old Posted May 14, 2012, 5:54 PM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
we built this city
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
I was born in London, England so I tend not to think of any place under 500,000 people as being a city even though the Canadian definition is quite a bit lower than that. When I first moved to Canada, I didn't consider anything under 3 million to be a city so I'm getting better! Halifax is great, but it doesn't have many of the trappings I associate with 'city': a subway system, a range of professional sports, major galleries and museums, outlets by the fashion houses: Louis Vuitton/Burberry/Prada, a stadium, zoo/aquarium, amusement parks, multi-national firms based in the city, etc.
Very true.

Although we don't have some of those things due to all these naysayers! We will eventually have some of those elements that make a city livable!

Just think, we didn't even have Starbucks a few years ago!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #430  
Old Posted May 14, 2012, 6:12 PM
JET JET is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,814
Having Starbucks is an improvement? Having two locations of Two if by Sea is what I would consider improvements.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #431  
Old Posted May 14, 2012, 6:50 PM
sdm sdm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by JET View Post
Having Starbucks is an improvement? Having two locations of Two if by Sea is what I would consider improvements.
Well at least we have a Two if by sea located downtown Halifax now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #432  
Old Posted May 14, 2012, 7:16 PM
robotropolis robotropolis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 47
Here's hoping they flip the land...my opinion, based on the Waterton and this latest scandal. Are there developers in town who have worse reputations right now?

http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...use-difficulty

"...In the documents, the couple said they only received $140,000 of the money awarded to them by the court after they applied for and received an execution order against Greater Homes’ assets...

...The applicants alleged that Greater Homes appears to have transferred business and goodwill to a similarly named corporate entity...

Greater Homes Inc., which lists Saeid Saberi as president and director, has the same 380 Bedford Hwy. address as Greater Homes Realty Inc., whose president and director is Saeid’s brother, Navid.

Navid Saberi is the president and director of United Gulf Developments Ltd., which is also located at 380 Bedford Hwy."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #433  
Old Posted May 14, 2012, 7:26 PM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by robotropolis View Post
Here's hoping they flip the land...
Whatever happens I just want it to occur! This empty site, after so many years, is nauseating.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #434  
Old Posted May 15, 2012, 6:39 PM
Haliobserver Haliobserver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 39
I saw on All NS the other day that there is yet another lawsuit against the Waterton Condo. This time by a couple named Jun Xi and Li Tian. I can only assume it is another breach of contract suit similar to all the others. Saberi lost the last one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #435  
Old Posted May 16, 2012, 1:54 AM
DigitalNinja DigitalNinja is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 964
I just hope that the company doesn't go bankrupt before the second building is built. Would be a shame to have it sit half finished for a while...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #436  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 9:27 PM
Haliobserver Haliobserver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 39
Greater Homes was forced into bankruptcy this afternoon. The company reportedly did not even send legal representatives to the hearing. Greater Homes' website advertises developments such as The Waterton, The Knolls, Voyageur Lakes, etc. It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but I would bet Skye Halifax is a no go. I don't care if the brothers say the companies are not related because everyone knows Greater Homes, United Gulf, Waterton, Skye, etc is all the same people.

Done like dinner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #437  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 9:28 PM
cormiermax's Avatar
cormiermax cormiermax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Beijing
Posts: 884
No real surprise here, major disappointment though.
__________________
http://v2studio.ca/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #438  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 10:01 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Is Greater Homes Inc. even related to Skye, aside from the fact that one of its owners (I guess) is the brother of Navid Saberi? This was always branded as a United Gulf proposal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #439  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 10:08 PM
q12's Avatar
q12 q12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 4,526
Read this: http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...use-difficulty

Quote:
According to the Registry of Joint Stock Companies, Greater Homes Inc., which lists Saeid Saberi as president and director, has the same 380 Bedford Hwy. address as Greater Homes Realty Inc., whose president and director is Saeid’s brother, Navid.

Navid Saberi is the president and director of United Gulf Developments Ltd., which is also located at 380 Bedford Hwy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #440  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 10:16 PM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Is it possible this could implicate new ownership for the Skye Halifax site, at the very least?

Assuming Skye is dead -- what now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:35 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.