HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     
Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive

    Aqua in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2001  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2007, 9:41 PM
Chitown Chitown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 584
Geez, what are they doing to that grass in MP? It looks as if that picture as taken in Florida or something.
     
     
  #2002  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2007, 10:24 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 1,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyBuyer View Post
From the Sunday Sun-Times: "The developers are talking a trade with the city: Surrendering one of the development sites for the school, probably along Columbus Drive south of the Aqua. In exchange, the city would grant zoning authority for buildings a little taller than a current maximum of about 70 stories near Lake Shore Drive."

I was under the understanding that the school would go between the Chandler and the Lancaster... it would be a shame if they put it inbetween the BCBS and Aqua, where another tall building would add some nice density to offset the huge plaza that surrounds the Aon Center.

They dont even really need to protect the views of Aqua from a sales standpoint, the building is almost entirely sold out. Another building with even only partial views of Millenium Park at that location should sell rather well. It would be a missed opportunity, IMO.
     
     
  #2003  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2007, 4:27 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,366
I'd rather they NOT put a tall building between Aqua and BCBS. . . it would be nice to have them mix it up with some mid-low rise stuff to give the park some scale. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
     
     
  #2004  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2007, 6:09 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
I was under the understanding that the school would go between the Chandler and the Lancaster... it would be a shame if they put it inbetween the BCBS and Aqua, where another tall building would add some nice density to offset the huge plaza that surrounds the Aon Center.

They dont even really need to protect the views of Aqua from a sales standpoint, the building is almost entirely sold out. Another building with even only partial views of Millenium Park at that location should sell rather well. It would be a missed opportunity, IMO.

I agree. We already have the massive Aqua base and BCBS Plaza on either side of the narrow development site (= plenty of low-rise stuff to the west from the park level). Personally, I think this would be an excellent site for LSE's next rental tower, as the location is phenomenal for apartments (less space for cars needed), less than 3 block walk from probably 7 or 8 million sq ft of office space (BCBS, Prudential Plaza, Aon, Illinois Center, etc).....I think this is the wrong location for the school and much prefer where it was planned (not the park as Roeder was talking about, but the area between the Lancaster and Shoreham)...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #2005  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2007, 6:54 PM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
I'd rather they NOT put a tall building between Aqua and BCBS. . . it would be nice to have them mix it up with some mid-low rise stuff to give the park some scale. . .
Something 300' or so would be nice, but certianly not more than 400' imo. Aqua's podium will give it some breathing room. I don't think the space should be sacrificed for nothingness, but it would be even worse to build something 600' or greater.
__________________
My: Skyscraper Art - Diagrams - Diagram Thread
     
     
  #2006  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2007, 8:59 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,952
Curved balconies for the fourth floor slab have been installed but are currently covered in plastic for whatever reason.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
     
     
  #2007  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2007, 9:18 PM
Saber925 Saber925 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alliance View Post
Something 300' or so would be nice, but certianly not more than 400' imo. Aqua's podium will give it some breathing room. I don't think the space should be sacrificed for nothingness, but it would be even worse to build something 600' or greater.
Once BCBS announced their expanded height, the site south of Aqua lost it's value for a high-rise condo building. The southern views of Millennium Park are gone. Magellan still has 3 or 4 sites to develop in the Northeast corner of LSE. These sites will have great lake views and command better prices, so I can see why Magellan wants to trade the site south of Aqua in exchange for increased heights for other buildings.

However, I don't see how a school works at that site. If it is at the park level, will it be surrounded on three sides by 50 foot walls? If it is at the upper Columbus Street level then what do you put in the 4 to 5 level podium, plus the children will have a very long staircase to get to the park for any outdoor activities.
     
     
  #2008  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2007, 10:09 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saber925 View Post
However, I don't see how a school works at that site. If it is at the park level, will it be surrounded on three sides by 50 foot walls? If it is at the upper Columbus Street level then what do you put in the 4 to 5 level podium, plus the children will have a very long staircase to get to the park for any outdoor activities.
The lower levels could be parking for staff, as well as the gym area, library or lunchroom. The building could be tiered to allow for outdoor space also.

Long staircases? So what, a little exercise will prevent them from becoming fat ass adults.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #2009  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2007, 1:10 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Long staircases? So what, a little exercise will prevent them from becoming fat ass adults.
Parents should be more concerned about their kid's wellbeing after being forced to spend years inside a Loewenberg-designed school.

*I don't know who's actually designing the school, but I sure hope it's not him. Although it might make for a cool psychological experiment...
     
     
  #2010  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2007, 2:10 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,033
[QUOTE=Saber925;3195753]Once BCBS announced their expanded height, the site south of Aqua lost it's value for a high-rise condo building. The southern views of Millennium Park are gone. Magellan still has 3 or 4 sites to develop in the Northeast corner of LSE. These sites will have great lake views and command better prices, so I can see why Magellan wants to trade the site south of Aqua in exchange for increased heights for other buildings.
QUOTE]


I'd agree for condo, but not for rentals. This would be the most ideal site for the next rental tower...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #2011  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2007, 3:04 AM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
Parents should be more concerned about their kid's wellbeing after being forced to spend years inside a Loewenberg-designed school.

*I don't know who's actually designing the school, but I sure hope it's not him. Although it might make for a cool psychological experiment...
Cheap architecture induces mental redardation?

Seriously, its fun to be all "ha ha" etc, but the man is giving us what might be the most significant piece of Chicago highrise architecture since JHC.
__________________
My: Skyscraper Art - Diagrams - Diagram Thread
     
     
  #2012  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2007, 3:40 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alliance View Post
Cheap architecture induces mental redardation?

Seriously, its fun to be all "ha ha" etc, but the man is giving us what might be the most significant piece of Chicago highrise architecture since JHC.
No, Jeanne Gane and her team is...
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #2013  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2007, 4:16 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,366
I disagree. . . Aqua isn't that groundbreaking. . . it's interesting, but nothing more than that. . . and the podium is pretty hideous. . . it's just too big and doesn't help with the existing experience of isolation one gets walking around Illinois Center. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
     
     
  #2014  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2007, 5:00 PM
cbotnyse cbotnyse is offline
Chicago Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 1,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
I disagree. . . Aqua isn't that groundbreaking. . . it's interesting, but nothing more than that. . .
I'd say its extemely interesting, probably second to the Spire in Chicago right now. This building will stand out and make a statement. I love it.
     
     
  #2015  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2007, 5:39 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 12,075
Nov 30 - AM

From Lower LSD w Spire cranes in foreground.

__________________
Harry C --- Chicago rep for SkyRise Cities ---- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #2016  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2007, 12:53 AM
EarlyBuyer's Avatar
EarlyBuyer EarlyBuyer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 885
Thanks harryc.
     
     
  #2017  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2007, 2:48 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 17,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
I disagree. . . Aqua isn't that groundbreaking. . . it's interesting, but nothing more than that. . . and the podium is pretty hideous. . . it's just too big and doesn't help with the existing experience of isolation one gets walking around Illinois Center. . .
The problem is that it's elevated above Columbus. When I initially saw plans (as a lurker here), and of course didn't read anything, it looked to me like the top of the Aqua podium would be level with Columbus and accessible. I thought it was perfect that they bridged the gap between the elevated Columbus Drive and lower park with a "upper park" and a long staircase. But alas, it'll look like a big one story blank wall along Columbus.

I think it would have been awesome to link the Lakeshore East park with Lake Street (or is it Water Street?) by way of a big, sweeping, Spanish Steps type staircase with retail along that side of the park, where the Aqua townhomes are.
     
     
  #2018  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2007, 4:00 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
I disagree. . . Aqua isn't that groundbreaking. . . it's interesting, but nothing more than that. . . and the podium is pretty hideous. . . it's just too big and doesn't help with the existing experience of isolation one gets walking around Illinois Center. . .
As far as I can tell from never having seen it, I think I agree with this statement.

But it is a pretty damn promising start for a firm that has never done high-rises before, and it's obvious with their Hyde Park proposal that they are getting better.

Anyway, having interesting a good design is better than simply trying to be groundbreaking arbitrarily. I am not convinced yet that Aqua is good design yet, but I am hopeful the details will make it so.
     
     
  #2019  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2007, 9:58 PM
EarlyBuyer's Avatar
EarlyBuyer EarlyBuyer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 885
Newly Installed Marketing Banners

Photo's taken by EarlyBuyer 12/1/07







     
     
  #2020  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2007, 11:10 PM
EarlyBuyer's Avatar
EarlyBuyer EarlyBuyer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 885
Construction Update Photo's #1

Taken by EarlyBuyer 12/1/07













     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts

 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:07 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.