Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian
Preservation prevails in Detroit!
http://www.freep.com/article/2013081...ank-demolition
Bob Kraemer must have been paid some big bucks to support the demolition of a historic building. Doesn't exactly bring a good name to his architectural firm considering they've been behind a lot of the historic renovations around downtown.
|
No comment should have been his answer if asked. Wanting to tear down that building was an awful idea. And architects should always deal with challenges creatively, not wiping them out. The Penobscot isn't doing well because it's vintage. The demands on modern office space are so extreme nowadays since every firm is heavy into tech and bigger on open office space. Typically these buildings were well suited for boutique firms, small non profits, and doctors offices. In any major city, these firms don't typically receive the luxury of connected parking....that's why they pay less in an old building. Architects should work to make upper floors more desireable to boutique firms that typically have younger employees that will park further away, bike or take transit to their job.
I should point out that for evey garage Detroit builds, it's equally a loss to economic development. That's less available property to put tax paying businesses workers and residents on. Detroit's core is so tied up with infrastructure and support systems that I worry sometimes future transit won't be as effective as it could be.
Ideally most folks would get in the mindset that the people mover could provide great utility as a shuttle from parking to the office. Plus walking a couple blocks to work is healthy and enjoyable.