HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Central Park Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4861  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 5:29 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBone7281 View Post
The earlier version was very... phallic.
I don't know any women who would want a slanted edge in their vaginas.
     
     
  #4862  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 5:57 PM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetscaper View Post
Yes they're lovely pics, but about 2.5 weeks old
Correct. Also, 220 CPS’s crane is currently almost taken down and shouldn’t be visible in that shot anymore.
     
     
  #4863  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 6:40 PM
ILNY ILNY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
^^^These have to be older pics. If you count the number of stories above the currently installed cladding, there are at least 12 in these pics and around 17 in the pics above them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetscaper View Post
Yes they're lovely pics, but about 2.5 weeks old
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
Correct. Also, 220 CPS’s crane is currently almost taken down and shouldn’t be visible in that shot anymore.
It takes me quite some time to process all my photos and I usually post with 1-3 week delay. If you don't want to see 2 weeks old pictures I will not be posting them anymore.
     
     
  #4864  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 7:04 PM
TonyL TonyL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILNY View Post
It takes me quite some time to process all my photos and I usually post with 1-3 week delay. If you don't want to see 2 weeks old pictures I will not be posting them anymore.
Post away. It was confusing me which was the only reason I asked. The most pics we have posted the better. I wasn't giving you a rough time at all.
     
     
  #4865  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 7:22 PM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILNY View Post
It takes me quite some time to process all my photos and I usually post with 1-3 week delay. If you don't want to see 2 weeks old pictures I will not be posting them anymore.
No, keep posting your pics regardless of their age. They are excellent. We just wanted to clarify the time frame on some of them for people who may not realize when they were taken.
     
     
  #4866  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 7:29 PM
NYCrules's Avatar
NYCrules NYCrules is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILNY View Post
It takes me quite some time to process all my photos and I usually post with 1-3 week delay. If you don't want to see 2 weeks old pictures I will not be posting them anymore.
No dude, the only reason the thread has come back to life after being on coma for 3 days is your post. Please keep them coming as I'm sure many appreciate your post
     
     
  #4867  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2017, 12:36 AM
streetscaper streetscaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 2,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILNY View Post
It takes me quite some time to process all my photos and I usually post with 1-3 week delay. If you don't want to see 2 weeks old pictures I will not be posting them anymore.
Trust me I understand how long it takes to edit the pics , and yours are especially appreciated
__________________
hmmm....
     
     
  #4868  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2017, 12:42 AM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILNY View Post
It takes me quite some time to process all my photos and I usually post with 1-3 week delay. If you don't want to see 2 weeks old pictures I will not be posting them anymore.
aww no, no, no.

post what you want — anytime !!!

i always look forward to your updates.
     
     
  #4869  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2017, 2:03 PM
ILNY ILNY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
^^^^
Thank you all. I still have some 2 weeks old Hudson Yards photos, will post soon.
     
     
  #4870  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2017, 8:55 PM
TonyL TonyL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 234
Trying to determine scale of this one. If Essex House is 461 feet and 503 to the tip, that would place the construction of CTP at or a little over 600 feet at this point IMO.
     
     
  #4871  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2017, 11:02 PM
WhatTheHeck5205 WhatTheHeck5205 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Who knows
Posts: 117
Speaking of the Essex House, I think I posted on this thread a long time ago saying I thought CPT was “hideous” and I hoped it would get a height reduction or be canceled outright. At the time I thought it would be way too big in comparison to the Essex House/other buildings along CPS. I have to say though that this tower has really grown on me. Idk if I’m crazy about the idea of NYC one day having truly Coruscant-sized buildings one day as some of you guys have suggested, but right now I’m all for CPT and the whole current wave of supertalls.

Last edited by WhatTheHeck5205; Nov 10, 2017 at 11:13 PM.
     
     
  #4872  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2017, 11:50 AM
TonyL TonyL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhyllisJerry71 View Post
Speaking of the Essex House, I think I posted on this thread a long time ago saying I thought CPT was “hideous” and I hoped it would get a height reduction or be canceled outright. At the time I thought it would be way too big in comparison to the Essex House/other buildings along CPS. I have to say though that this tower has really grown on me. Idk if I’m crazy about the idea of NYC one day having truly Coruscant-sized buildings one day as some of you guys have suggested, but right now I’m all for CPT and the whole current wave of supertalls.
That's the same for me with 432. I couldn't stand that building initially but now it's kind of grown on me. I plan on a day trip to NYC once CTP is topped out to see just how dramatic this one is on the skyline. NYC is only 3 hours from the house.
     
     
  #4873  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2017, 2:02 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
That's the same for me with 432. I couldn't stand that building initially but now it's kind of grown on me. I plan on a day trip to NYC once CTP is topped out to see just how dramatic this one is on the skyline. NYC is only 3 hours from the house.
I agree. 432 is magnificent. I wouldn't want every building in the city to have that design, but it's simplicity is also unique with respect to the other supertalls in or rising in midtown, all of which have unique shapes, such as:

One Vanderbilt,
Verre
Steinway
30 Hudson Yards
The Spiral
ESB
Chrysler
220 CPS
Citicorp.
     
     
  #4874  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2017, 8:26 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,853

Credit: killahwave
     
     
  #4875  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 12:58 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
Starting to really gain some height … this one will take many by surprise.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
     
     
  #4876  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 1:07 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,919
^ It's nearly half it's height already, which is hard to believe.



Punkt Aki

__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #4877  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 11:20 PM
WhatTheHeck5205 WhatTheHeck5205 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Who knows
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
I agree. 432 is magnificent. I wouldn't want every building in the city to have that design, but it's simplicity is also unique with respect to the other supertalls in or rising in midtown, all of which have unique shapes, such as:

One Vanderbilt,
Verre
Steinway
30 Hudson Yards
The Spiral
ESB
Chrysler
220 CPS
Citicorp.
Yes. 432’s beauty is definitely in its simplicity. It manages to convey the wealth of its residents without being ostentatious—vs. something like Trump Tower, whose gaudy design is meant to compensate for the fact that its occupants are (relatively) less well off.
     
     
  #4878  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 11:50 PM
TonyL TonyL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 234
That 4874 post is absolutely stunning.

NY guy, would you believe that exact view was my morning view for 6 months following 9-11? We deployed to NYC on a Coast Guard ship and my certification to operate the ship alone with a crew of 16 was there. There was a point that I had 75 moving contacts on radar. I shit you not.
     
     
  #4879  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 12:44 AM
streetscaper streetscaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 2,712

City of Steel by Pixelicus, on Flickr
__________________
hmmm....
     
     
  #4880  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 2:11 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,782
So the building permits for this tower show 1,556 ft., not 1,550. Mods should probably change.

This may also explain why Extell refers to this tower as "over 1,550 ft." I had thought this was a hint that a spire was coming, but it could just be, that, yeah, it's literally 6 ft. over 1,550.

But I'm still hoping we get a spire. This tower needs it!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:53 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.