Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevo26
Looks like the Free Press are at it again - jerking us all off with yet another proposal that will likely never get built. Even if the city's portion is limited to 25% of the total cost, that still works out to $41 million, in the same ballpark as what was spent to build the Budweiser Centre (and from which the city has yet to recoup its investment).
To make this work, and that's assuming all levels of government are fully on board, the condos that get built as part of the project will have to be fairly high-end (i.e expen$ive) to generate enough revenue to get the project off the ground. I say that because I just can't see how a 2,000 seat performing arts centre on its own is ever going to generate that kind of revenue, even if the cost is amortized over eons of time.
London, the city where no real economic growth happens, just proposals that promise it.
|
I'm sorry, but are you reading the same articles that I am? Do you understand what the proposal is? Probably not because it hasn't be totally outlined yet. I do know that it's more than just the city working on this and I know that the residential and hotel component will be owned and managed by private companies. And I guess if you want to have the city run as lean as possible with no Bud Gardens, no arts centre, no nothing...then why live in a major Canadian city? Why don't you move to a small town where you won't have these amenities? London completes on a national stage for jobs and it needs to have the same attractions as it's competitors. All Canadian cities London's size have a performance hall. I think it is a good deal for London to see this massive investment. And I am a taxpayer.