HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > SSP: Local London > Transportation & Infrastructure

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted: Jun 20, 2012, 3:08 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 353
Really 1.7 million dollars and 3 news buses? I certainly understand there would be a significant cost for new bus stops/shelters, etc on King and Queen streets however why the need for 3 more buses?

http://www.lfpress.com/news/london/2.../19897601.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted: Jun 20, 2012, 4:22 PM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSlippery519 View Post
Really 1.7 million dollars and 3 news buses? I certainly understand there would be a significant cost for new bus stops/shelters, etc on King and Queen streets however why the need for 3 more buses?

http://www.lfpress.com/news/london/2.../19897601.html
I am guessing that because the altered routes will be longer and will involve a couple of left turns that aren't there now, additional buses will be required in order to maintain frequency of buses on the affected routes without taking buses away from other routes.
__________________
Canada abolished Penny? She must not have offered them a hot beverage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted: Jun 20, 2012, 10:02 PM
FazDeH's Avatar
FazDeH FazDeH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 207
I read the LFP article as well, and what struck me as odd is that a larger portion of this money is being allocated to adding 3 new buses because of this? Am I alone in thinking that the extra block in either direction shouldn't constitute the purchasing of 1.2 million in vehicles?
Gas; I get.. bus stops; I get.. but 3 new buses? common ltc... common.
__________________
Number of buildings listed on SSPs Diagram section? 191
Number of people living in the cities metro area? 496,900
Knowing London has a better looking skyline than that of any other city our size? PRICELESS
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted: Jun 20, 2012, 10:42 PM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by FazDeH View Post
I read the LFP article as well, and what struck me as odd is that a larger portion of this money is being allocated to adding 3 new buses because of this? Am I alone in thinking that the extra block in either direction shouldn't constitute the purchasing of 1.2 million in vehicles?
Gas; I get.. bus stops; I get.. but 3 new buses? common ltc... common.
In the downtown area, it very well might require additional bus purchases, especially at rush hour. Buses will need to make left turns from Wellington onto Queens Ave, and that area can get pretty backed up.

At the same time, we don't know if these buses might also be replacing older ones. I've been away from London for almost six months; are any of those orange buses still on the road?
__________________
Canada abolished Penny? She must not have offered them a hot beverage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted: Jun 20, 2012, 11:32 PM
FazDeH's Avatar
FazDeH FazDeH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 207
^^^ I hadn't thought about downtown congestion being a factor for the need for extra buses, but you're right sometimes those left turns can be a little busy, considering the traffic flow down dundas at peak times, I can't imagine it would be that impactful on scheduling.(Especially considering every bus seems stop downtown for several minutes to wait as it is.. )

As for the orange buses, I haven't seen any in a while, but I think there are likely some that are still operating.
From what the article said though, these would be additional vehicles, not ones to be used to replace existing buses.
__________________
Number of buildings listed on SSPs Diagram section? 191
Number of people living in the cities metro area? 496,900
Knowing London has a better looking skyline than that of any other city our size? PRICELESS
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2012, 12:22 AM
BIGGUY2891 BIGGUY2891 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by manny_santos View Post
At the same time, we don't know if these buses might also be replacing older ones. I've been away from London for almost six months; are any of those orange buses still on the road?
All the older buses have been retired as of a couple months ago. There were 20+ Xcelsior models brought into operation over the past few months. You can see the active fleet through this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Transit
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2012, 12:35 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by manny_santos View Post
I am guessing that because the altered routes will be longer and will involve a couple of left turns that aren't there now, additional buses will be required in order to maintain frequency of buses on the affected routes without taking buses away from other routes.
How much longer are we really talking though? I can see maybe needing to add 1 more bus to make up for the slightly longer route but 3 I just think this is the LTC's way of trying to get the city to back down from the idea of removing buses from Dundas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2012, 2:30 PM
londoner_abroad londoner_abroad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSlippery519 View Post
How much longer are we really talking though? I can see maybe needing to add 1 more bus to make up for the slightly longer route but 3 I just think this is the LTC's way of trying to get the city to back down from the idea of removing buses from Dundas.
Remember there is more then one route along Dundas, I am actually surprised it will only take three more buses to reroute all routes. I believe they want to keep the same level of service and if they are now faced with a longer route they will need to add busses and modify schedules in order for buses to run as frequently(or not..haha) as they do now. One thing I think most people don't realise is all the behind the scenes work that would have to happen to change all these routes permanently - scheduling is a big one, think of all new schedules that have to be re-calulated, reprinted, the bus schedules as the stops changed, all maps at bus shelters changed. All we see is the bus and stop moving but there is a lot that has to happen for this type of change. Personally, I am happy with this proposed change, I always believed that a loop system within the downtown could work great, it will add to the dynamic of downtown with people actually moving around not just standing at the stop they got off at waiting for another bus. Plus now the Police will be able to tell at least some of the downtown loiterers to get moving as they will no longer be able to use the "i am waiting for the bus" excuse all day long...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2012, 9:31 PM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 363
Great to hear council is serious about implementing this King-Queens loop, taking buses off Dundas! If it does end up being implemented, its a fait accompli for Dundas becoming a pedestrianized.

Though I find the LTC, specifically Ducharme, has been very negative & cold to the idea. When it was suggested by council, he instantly began bemoaning the costs of doing it rather than finding a way to re-jig underutilized routes to make up for the extra travel time. Then when the city gets greater than expected transit funding for the province, and Ducharme says LTC has other priorities...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2012, 10:11 PM
FazDeH's Avatar
FazDeH FazDeH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 207
^^^ did he happen to mention what those other priorities would be? Optimizing the routes and their impact on the parts of the city seem like it should be pretty high on the list... the blue signs must be paramount.
__________________
Number of buildings listed on SSPs Diagram section? 191
Number of people living in the cities metro area? 496,900
Knowing London has a better looking skyline than that of any other city our size? PRICELESS
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2012, 10:42 PM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 363
From http://www.lfpress.com/news/london/2...-19855411.html

About $5.5 million of it will go toward operating costs and maintenance, new buses and the transit system's smart card payment program.

Still leaves $4 million of that free, either unaccounted or assigned yet. Ducharme doesn't seem all that pleased doing this re-routing. Rather than go look as see how the plan can be implemented, he moans says they need an addition $1.7 million rather than be creative. The LTC would do better fortifying the busy routes they currently have, than extending milk runs to the far edges of the city IMO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted: Jun 22, 2012, 1:09 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpmasterdac View Post
Ducharme doesn't seem all that pleased doing this re-routing. Rather than go look as see how the plan can be implemented, he moans says they need an addition $1.7 million rather than be creative. The LTC would do better fortifying the busy routes they currently have, than extending milk runs to the far edges of the city IMO.
That is exactly how it seems, he just doesn't seem interested in anything unless it was his idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > SSP: Local London > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:50 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.