Quote:
Originally Posted by clynnog
By Ottawa do you mean the "City" of Ottawa, the Ottawa portion of the Ottawa-Gatineau CMA or the area that can currently call "Ottawa" phone numbers w/o LD charges. For the "City" of Ottawa route there are problems as people near Arnprior, Kemptville, etc, who are technically in the "City" of Ottawa typically have phone # exchanges that are also assigned to areas outside the "City" of Ottawa. (i.e people in the 'City' of Ottawa near Arnprior have 613 623 exchange #'s just like regular Arnprior folks yet there is no easy way to determine from the last 4 digits on a 613 623 whether or not they live in Arnprior proper or Ottawa proper.
What about all new activations get the new area code within the current 613. Most of the growth is via cell #'s...fax/pager activations have died out these days, haven't they?
|
That does seem to be the problem, indeed. The boundaries between exchanges would be more of a jagged edge rather than the clean political boundary of the amalgamated City of Ottawa (which is what I had in mind). The last split to be done in Canada (514/450) was easy to do because 514 just stayed on the Island of Montreal and thus the boundary was clear.
Another option would've been to split away the 613 Local Calling Area centered on Ottawa, which then would've included most of the adjacent municipalities but, again, with a jagged edge, so some of the municipalities would've ended up with two area codes.
I can see why the Overlay solution is the simplest one, but it would still make long-term sense IMHO to retain the geographic identifiability of an area code by splitting large territories like this one when relief is needed. At least you'd know whether the phone number you're dialing is in Ottawa or elsewhere in Eastern Ontario if it's 613 or 343.