HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2012, 7:05 PM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
They're still winning a lot of battles. Their type of thinking dominates much of the country, and influences even the places they don't dominate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2012, 7:27 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,744
Trying to stop suburban sprawl is a waste of time. Urban planning is waste of time. Any suburb can have high transit ridership anyways - all that matters is the level of transit service. The design of the environment is not a big factor at all for getting people out of their cars.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2012, 8:07 PM
LtBk LtBk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
They're still winning a lot of battles. Their type of thinking dominates much of the country, and influences even the places they don't dominate.
That's right-wing populism for you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2012, 10:20 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
Considering that people now value inner city living above suburban, the suburbs have already lost.

However, at least in this country, the two complement each other well. Its the fetishization of the suburbs to the detriment of the inner city that has come to an end, measured by the fact that the vacancy rate for housing in most American cities is in the single digits, whereas many suburban (esp exurban) homes are practically worthless.

Haven't you guys noticed that its strange that in the worst recession in 75 years, people continue to flock to the city instead of the suburbs, which you would consider more familiar to many people?

Psychologically, many people (not all, obviously) are following the money - jobs and living a more urban, efficient lifestyle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2012, 11:54 PM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
The suburban trend has been based on "driving until you qualify" (oil prices screwed that up), avoiding different types of people (many are integrating at a rapid pace), good schools (often budgets are tanking the worst farther out), lack of crime (guess where it's headed?), free-flowing traffic (long gone), subsidies for roads etc. (also long gone), an absence of derelict properties (died in 2008), and the general new-ness of everything (some places are getting very little that's new).

Likewise, cities have historically driven people outward for reasons that are often not true anymore.

I buy that most people still like houses. But the trends aren't "way out" anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:43 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.