Quote:
Originally Posted by mistercorporate
Listen bro, there's nothing wrong with having opinions, but when someone clearly states they don't want to engage with you, then it's wise to respect that request. Otherwise it becomes an unpleasant pissing match. There's more than one kind of intelligence, social intelligence is half, just my two cents.
|
Opinions are being posted as facts based on wrong information. It doesn't matter who the poster is because it's not personal. Andrew may have stated something along those lines but, he has never actually committed to it. He revels in it since he first joined the forum two dozen accounts ago. I ignore him more often than engage him. It's only when he posts something factually wrong that I respond and only to bring light to the error.
He's already gloating through misrepresenting my speculations on this development from years ago and it's barely a hole in the ground. Just wait if this one gets completed without any hiccups along the way.
Seriously dude. I posted a link to urbantoronto.ca that states the previous article was wrong in assuming top down was the method being used here as a conclusion to the ongoing speculation. This led to a troll this and troll that response and how he only trusts urbantoronto.ca. He didn't even check the link.
Interesting two cents there. I'd love to go further with it but, I see your point that no one else cares.