Even that is a generous timeline....
What saddens me the most about this entire political stunt of Meggs, his viaduct circus it should be called, is that developers were already well on their way in planning how to build between and beside the ducts. I remember seeing a concord rendering with towers between and beside them. This would have made one of the most interesting urban areas in Vancouver. The area between the stadiums with Costco and the train station already is amazingly interesting. but now I am betting all that development is shelved just to see how this parade ends. Thanks Meggs!
Maybe that is why he brought it up so suddenly, because he saw this was going to be his last chance to destroy them before they became too engrained in the urban fabric...
And here is what I find very ironic about the winning bid. I thought one of the main complaints was that the viaducts act as a barrier (which they are not if managed properly by the city), yet the winning design has water canals throughout it. One would think that water bodies are much more obvious barriers than the viaducts! All those special paths have to built over them, while any place under the viaduct can be crossed (again just take down the faces and build a park!)
The funniest thing is nearly all that is sown in the winning idea can be done with one of both of the viaducts still standing!