HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #421  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2010, 4:35 AM
christopherj christopherj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 502
Stephen Harper's politics: Yes to Quebec City's Olympic dreams, no to Edmonton's Expo aspirations

By David Staples

It was widely reported across Canada on Monday that Prime Minister Stephen Harper had turned down direct federal funding of Quebec City's arena.

In fact, Harper did no such thing. If you read his entire quote, you'll see he is still open to paying for a hockey arena in Quebec City if it's part of an Olympic Games.

After turning down Edmonton's leaders in their bid for the 2017 Expo -- without negotiation and because of greatly over-stated if not bogus concerns over security costs -- Harper has made it clear to Quebec City leaders that his government will support a Quebec City bid for the 2022 Winter Games.

http://communities.canada.com/edmont...pirations.aspx
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #422  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2010, 12:59 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,439
If you've been following the Olympic bid, you will know the international ski federation has put it on ice by rejecting the now third proposal for their downhill skiing mountain. So unless they are able to pull a rabbit out of their hat on that one, the bid is dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #423  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2010, 2:54 AM
naidoo's Avatar
naidoo naidoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edmonton/Vancouver
Posts: 196
^Precisely. This Quebec City 2022 bid is effectively dead...unless they can strike a deal with Lake Placid, NY, but that makes the venues just too far away (~ 5 h drive!).... I suppose Harper could still score some political points in Quebec by suggesting that he would have supported a new arena if it were a part of the Olympic bid. But circumstances out of his control means that it can't happen, and so he ends up looking OK from the whole situation, maybe.

Any idea if Edmonton would still consider a 2020 Expo bid? I thought the bid theme and concept needed a lot more work anyways...seemed pretty wishy-washy. But there is some potential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #424  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2010, 3:36 AM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,439
2020 would be the big fair, which if the small one cost north of 2 billion, I would be afraid of what one that uses at least twice the room, and runs twice as long would cost. (and add those things into an inflated security budget too!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #425  
Old Posted Jan 2, 2011, 3:35 PM
blacktrojan3921's Avatar
blacktrojan3921 blacktrojan3921 is online now
Regina rhymes with fun!
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 887
Quebec City 2022? I have high doubts that will happen mainly for two reasons lol. The first one has already been stated before that there is not a suitable location for the alpine and downhill skiing competition near the city.

The second being that there's already talks of Toronto preparing to bid for the 2020 and/or 2024 Summer Olympics, and considering that we have just finished hosting the winter olympics, it would be more likely that Toronto's bid would get the backing from the government.

Now onto the expo, I still have the belief that in the end the government will provide the federal funding needed for the expo; it's way too early to call this bid dead since the official deadline for submitting the bid is around 2012 I believe.

Last edited by blacktrojan3921; Jan 3, 2011 at 9:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #426  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2011, 2:33 AM
Jasper and one o nin's Avatar
Jasper and one o nin Jasper and one o nin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Лесные Высоты
Posts: 3,339
^...............?
__________________
"Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice. Carl Spackler, 1980
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #427  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2011, 5:13 AM
bikegypsy's Avatar
bikegypsy bikegypsy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by blacktrojan3921 View Post
Quebec City 2022? I have high doubts that will happen mainly for two reasons lol. The first one has already been stated before that there is not a suitable location for the alpine and downhill skiing competition near the city.

The second being that there's already talks of Toronto preparing to bid for the 2020 and/or 2024 Summer Olympics, and considering that we have just finished hosting the winter olympics, it would be more likely that Toronto's bid would get the backing from the government.
Indeed. Downhill ski events are what track and field events are to the summer games... Basically the most important in terms of viewership and general appeal. There are so many towns and cities around the world which are close to worthy mountains and which would be able to host the games.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #428  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2011, 6:00 PM
rk2000 rk2000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 544
Well, suddenly, there is a $1 billion available....

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1881605/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #429  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 1:22 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,782
Just listening to CTV News. Ambrose mentioned other reasons for killing Expo...no business plan, no firm infrastructure plans, no P3.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #430  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2011, 5:53 AM
blacktrojan3921's Avatar
blacktrojan3921 blacktrojan3921 is online now
Regina rhymes with fun!
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
Just listening to CTV News. Ambrose mentioned other reasons for killing Expo...no business plan, no firm infrastructure plans, no P3.
Wait... The Expo organizers never applied for the P3 plan?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #431  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2011, 5:57 AM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,439
Umm, I don't really see how a P3 could work at all for something short term like Expo. Plus, the P3 fund is limited to 25% of project capital cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #432  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2011, 8:14 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,178
And now the rest of the story

__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #433  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2011, 8:18 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,770
Did anyone else honestly think otherwise, really?
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #434  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2011, 8:21 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,439
The billion dollar price tag was just too high, I think any more complicated explanations are just attempts are kremlinology. Remember the documents released under access to information cannot contain advice to the minister, so all that has been exposed is mid level analysis. Of course a department in charge of promoting culture would be for an event promoting culture. But when it came down to brass tacks, a billion dollars for 3 months was seen as excessive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #435  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2011, 8:34 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,770
Their review of required security should have been seen as excessive...
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #436  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2011, 6:05 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,046
Required security was a joke, I can't believe how many people voted for Rona Ambrose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #437  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2011, 11:25 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,782
A pity this info didn't come out before the election.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #438  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2011, 1:45 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,439
Wasn't the federal governments operational / capital contribution as a one third partner in the $700 million range to start with, even before their security estimate?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #439  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2011, 5:35 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
A pity this info didn't come out before the election.
Would have had ZERO effect in Edmonton.
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:52 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.