HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2015, 11:15 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
That's what subways are for. I'm afraid I can't feel sorry for you losing road space to pedestrian space when you have multiple transit routes to choose from between Downtown and the UWS. Considering the subway coverage and population density, Manhattan should probably lose a few more streets.
The last time I took the NRQ at night the train stopped for an hour due to signal failure. I don't take the subway at night, and never have (especially in the summer when it's too damn hot down there, period).

Times Square is, self-evidently, quite successful as it is. There's no need to seriously inconvenience Manhattanites by making it even more of a tourist playground.

Also, New Yorkers seem able to cross the streets just fine with traffic. The congestion in Times Square is because of thousands of tourists milling around taking pictures, getting lost and generally being in the way. No amount of pedestrianization will fix that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:18 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.