HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     
Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2008, 4:52 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,309
SAN FRANCISCO | Ultima Tower | 10,561 FT / 3,219 M | 500 FLOORS | VISION









Eugene Tsui originally conceived the idea of the Ultima Tower as part of a study of the compact urban area of San Francisco. The project combines nature with urban environment on a mega scale. The tower is two miles high with a base of 6000 feet in diameter. The structure's shape is modeled after the tallest structure not made by man-- African termite nests. The Ultima Tower is 500 stories tall and is intended to house one million residents.

The tower explores the idea of stacking nature vertically to conserve space. The structure contains stacked levels of soil that form individual landscapes with "skies" between 30 and 50 meters high. Neighborhoods of architectural structures can be built on these landscapes, forming a vertical city.

The structure is designed to be energy efficient. It has built in solar panels on its exterior, self-shading glass, windmills, and a water-based cooling system. The structure also utilizes Atmospheric Energy Conversion, converts the difference in atmospheric pressure at the top and bottom of the structure into electrical power.

The base of the Ultima Tower as seen covering San Francisco:



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2008, 5:01 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,926
I can't see the top photo, but 10,000 ft?
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2008, 8:56 PM
Wrightguy0's Avatar
Wrightguy0 Wrightguy0 is offline
All aboard the Failboat
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 389
UGLY, Eugene Tsui is just god awful I don't like any of his stuff
__________________
I'f I had a nickel for every time someone presented me with a good idea, well, I'd have a nickel
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2008, 3:03 PM
FLBlake's Avatar
FLBlake FLBlake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 56
It looks like a very stretched out nipple, like maybe a nipple with a piercing and someone is pulling hard on the piercing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2008, 10:34 AM
JVissle's Avatar
JVissle JVissle is offline
Can you fly Bobby?
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLBlake View Post
It looks like a very stretched out nipple, like maybe a nipple with a piercing and someone is pulling hard on the piercing.
LMFAO!!!

__________________
I don't know how to put this, I'm kind of a big deal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2008, 4:03 AM
RLS_rls's Avatar
RLS_rls RLS_rls is offline
▓▒░
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,601
^Lovely.

So whats the 'Eye in the Sky' building? Never heard of that one before...
__________________
ಠ_ಠ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2008, 4:30 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilon Doomm View Post
^Lovely.

So whats the 'Eye in the Sky' building? Never heard of that one before...
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=148538
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2008, 2:58 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilon Doomm View Post
So whats the 'Eye in the Sky' building? Never heard of that one before...
That's probably for the best.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2008, 3:21 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
That's probably for the best.
Good point.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2008, 6:41 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,479
You'd think the proposed location would be where the Pacific oceanic plate is not sub-ducting under the North American continental plate....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2008, 9:25 PM
Raraavis's Avatar
Raraavis Raraavis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,614
Why would you destroy half of one of the greatest cities on earth to build this thing. Put it in Oakland.
__________________
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.

-Galileo Galilei
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2008, 1:29 AM
America 117 America 117 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 613
this is too funny
thats the most ugly thing ive ever seen its not even a skyscraper its soo ugly.
dont destroy san francisco.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2008, 7:17 AM
TANGELD_SLC's Avatar
TANGELD_SLC TANGELD_SLC is offline
The World Is Welcome Here
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 884


Ok there's that top photo. I got it to work for me

What I don't get is why they propose these types of mammoth structures in the middle of an already-established area? I think it would be much more impressive if it was built, say, off the east or west coasts somewhere or on a plain in Kansas, or in a mountain valley in Utah, where there was nothing else built for miles and miles and miles.
__________________
Espavo!

Plyg, Metrosexual, & AVENian
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2012, 10:51 PM
JayCortese
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TANGELD_SLC View Post


Ok there's that top photo. I got it to work for me

What I don't get is why they propose these types of mammoth structures in the middle of an already-established area? I think it would be much more impressive if it was built, say, off the east or west coasts somewhere or on a plain in Kansas, or in a mountain valley in Utah, where there was nothing else built for miles and miles and miles.
That would be nice and impressive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2015, 7:08 PM
stormkingfan stormkingfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PhilaPA
Posts: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCortese View Post
That would be nice and impressive.
I can imagine that some back-fill dumped along the shores would be required for putting this thing on the end of the Peninsula. A 10,000-foot tower of this shape. Imagine the footprint of its base. Apparently, whoever came up with this idea for a "city within a city" didn't consider how much ground area would be needed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2008, 3:52 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,926
Have no fear America 117; San Francisco would never allow something that hideous to be erected anywhere near the city.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2008, 3:52 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raraavis View Post
Put it in Oakland.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2008, 5:35 AM
Stratosphere's Avatar
Stratosphere Stratosphere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 1,078
Oh god! Look at those "puny" supertalls being compared to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2008, 7:01 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,926
Tch, yeah I know; I beat that the base of the tower could completely cover up Lower Manhattan Island.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2009, 12:03 AM
citywarrior's Avatar
citywarrior citywarrior is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4
eugene tsui was probably high when he was designing this. It would help the population, but 1. It's too ugly. 2. It would probably collapse, 3. It costs 150 billion dollars, and 4. It looks like total crap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts

Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.