This guy, Bill Adams at UrbDeZine, really has it out for us here at SSP:
Quote:
Tall Towers: For Winners or Wannabes?
July 17, 2013 By Bill Adams
http://sandiego.urbdezine.com/2013/0...s-or-wannabes/
The race for respect via high rises and their unintended inverse branding:
Ah the false idolatry of tall towers, from Babylon to the present. Or to use a more present day phrase, “act like you’ve been there before,” not like a newcomer to the industrialized world. It seems like every place in the world that has been simmering awhile with an inferiority complex rushes to build a super high rise when they get some money. ”That’ll show the world we’re no rubes, no country bumpkins!” they seem to scream.
...
"My city, San Diego, is not excluded from high rise & skyline envy. The skyscraper contingent complains each time a mid-rise building is constructed downtown. They swoon over the skyline of Vancouver British Columbia, to which San Diego is often compared in its infancy. However, should the moniker of “Blandcouver” also be transferred? ”Bland Diego”? It may fit semantically as well as it does phonetically, as downtown Bland Diego is in the process of eliminating much of its architectural, land use, and population diversity via demolition for parking lots, presumably clearing the way for more drive-in / drive-out condo towers. The swooners pay lip service, at best, to the fact that true urbanism can be traced more to how a city treats its citizens on the street than those that dwell in the air, and arrive and leave by car.
To this day, there is a fascination in the U.S.’s second tier cities with joining the ranks of cities with dramatic skylines and super high rises. The web even has a forum for those who pine for ladders to the sky – the Skyscraperpage.com - with a chapter for nearly every city or high rise related topic."
|
I was going to post a comment for this article, but I couldn't find a function for it. So, I will reply here instead.
Firstly, this is a forum for people who like high-rises and skyscrapers. So, I guess I am less than shocked that there would be people here who advocate and support high-rise and skyscraper development. That portion of the article basically attacks us for what we openly support, as if doing so reveals some deep secret. In reality all it does is a) point out the obvious and b) alienates fellow urbanists. But hey! Who likes building coalitions these days anyways?
Second, I think it might be reasonable for us, here at Skyscraperpage (notice the word "skyscraper" in the title name, might give someone a clue as to what our prerogative might be), to be upset when mid-rise developments take away the very, very, very limited real estate in this region (San Diego County) where high-rise development can occur. I don't know if Mr. Adams is aware, but downtown is the only place in this county where high-rises of this size, density, and scale can be built. It's not like we have options here, good luck getting anything over three stories built in the rest of this metro.
To be fair, I do agree with Mr. Adams in that mid-rise development is not bad, and that street walkability and the urban dynamics of a community are not linked exclusively to high-rise development. In fact, these types of projects should be replicated throughout the urban neighborhoods of the city, where high-rise development should not occur.
However, as we are a community of skyscraper aficionados on a forum for skyscraper fans, I think we can agree that our disappointment here at SSP should not be surprising, nor belittled. Especially given our already limited opportunities. I mean, when less than one half of a percent of the total area in this county is available for potential (as in possible, as in not guaranteed, as in maybe) high-rise development, and that land is used to build another 5 story, concrete base-wooden frame structured project... well, I think Mr. Adams might better understand (and maybe appreciate) our frustrations here at SSP better.
In just, this guy is coming off as a jerk, especially after asking us the favor of signing his petition to halt the destruction of "historic" structures for parking spaces. I mean, make an argument, but don't belittle a community of hobbyists with no actual power other than a keyboard and an opinion.
I don't know how you all feel, but that's my two cents.