Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG
if toronto can get this and this...
|
HAHAHAHAHAAHAAH!!!!! totally!!!!
but on the serious side, though toderian and vancouver's planning staff seem very conservative, i'm sure that the new vag building will be very design-forward, almost certainly with a west coast/green theme.
but my greatest hope is that bing thom, arthur erickson, and the rest of them aren't allowed within 500 meters of the design until it hits the advanced review stage (and even then, they should all be handcuffed a radiator about 15 feet from the plans) - one thing vancouver doesn't need is a 'signature' (toderian's idiotic word) building the bases of which are found throughout the city.
in my opinion, moshe safdie's library square was the perfect vancouver public building when it was built - it was unique within the built landscape of the city, it was reserved but very design-forward. now that the city's developed more, we need something much more avant-garde, not tall (a tower would be a mistake), but grand.
okay, three things i hope we see considered/incorporated:
1) it has to be bright, well lit with natural light in non sensitive areas, with artificial compensation for sensitive places, like you have at the centre pompidou. in this sense, a busy, colorful multi-media experience like the seattle public library is all wrong.
2) the material should make sense within the local context, but push the envelope. personally, i hope they stay away from wood, but some significant stone aspect could really work. i also think exposed steel, ungodly massing and black glass (a la seattle public library) is horrifically unvancouver, and should be avoided as much as possible. it should also be leeds gold or platinum, just for the extra profile.
3) it should have approaches from all sides, rather than a central entrance. personally, i think the site, as it stands, is bad for the vag. georgia is busy, with a weak pedestrian scale/profile; the queen e theatre just kills the cambie side; beatty will probably be a busy side, with the new towers and skytrain proximity; dunsmuir's a vehicle corridor with little pedestrian activity. even if the city decides to demolish the viaducts (please oh please), the vag building still wouldn't have an obvious central entrance. safdie did a good job getting those multiple entrances in there while maintaining the integrity of the principle entrances on the library, and i'd hope it could be done there too.
i'm curious about what others think