Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg
That argument by the church is absurd. Prioritize belief over aesthetic... lol are you out of your minds?!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM
There is something fishy about that whole line of reasoning. It sounds like an excuse for the sake of 'keeping their options open' or something along those lines, which is, of course, total bullshit.
|
What's fishy?
Everyone knows that heritage designation, especially if it isn't expected when one first buys the property, can be a huge financial obstacle to any property owner without a lot of money.
Is "belief over aesthetic" the true reason? Perhaps not, but it may be the most effective one. Contrary to public perception, most churches have very, very little money.
If they ever wanted to develop or renovate to accomodate their church vision, a heritage designation would be a huge obstacle, thus indirectly infringing on their religious pursuit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ando
This could be why Germany is ranked 23rd out of 191 countries for alcohol consumption.
|