Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280
It really is turning out well. It's just depressing to realize that you have such a beautiful station now that will probably be gradually defaced by the CTA over the next 50-80 years until they finally will just tear it apart and completely rebuild it, probably with some horrible pomo-revival shit.
|
I wonder if the area businesses can establish a fund for routine station maintenance? In New York,
various districts have established organizations with a small tax funding source. They've learned that the city can really only afford to provide a basic amount of services, and they need to pay for anything above and beyond that - especially if the improvements entice people to come in and spend money. Station maintenance seems like the perfect use of such funding. If small problems are fixed as they crop up, they won't have a chance to become big problems.
It's not even a funding issue with CTA
per se, it's just an issue of management. If you have to maintain 144 stations, lots of things are gonna slip through the cracks. If you're only maintaining one, it's gonna stay pretty nice. Why do you think Metra has such nice stations? Each suburb pays to build, maintain, and police its own station(s).
Plus, Ross Barney and CTA have probably learned from 50 years of experience how to make modernist design properly vandal-proof and tolerant to Chicago's climate, so the station should be starting from a pretty good place.
Most of those premium finishes are out of the easy reach of graffiti artists.