HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2017, 2:55 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,048
Aren't much of Richmond and Delta composed of bogs and wetland in flood plains? Are they even practical to develop?
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2017, 3:18 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
Aren't much of Richmond and Delta composed of bogs and wetland in flood plains? Are they even practical to develop?
A huge part of Delta is, but I accounted for that in my extremely scientific analysis of guessing undeveloped area based on google earth. The remainder of Richmond's farmland is to my knowledge no different than all the farmland that has been developed and is now covered by suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2018, 10:39 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
I'm pretty sure Southern Ontario is referred to as the "Ontario Peninsula" in some geographic texts. I'll do some digging, as I'm minoring in Geography.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2018, 6:51 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
I'm pretty sure Southern Ontario is referred to as the "Ontario Peninsula" in some geographic texts. I'll do some digging, as I'm minoring in Geography.
I tried looking for it myself and couldn't find it, but in a historical geography class I took I'm pretty sure I remember it being referred to as "the Great Western Peninsula" at some point.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2018, 3:29 PM
Laceoflight's Avatar
Laceoflight Laceoflight is offline
Montérégien
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Montréal, QC <> Paris, FR
Posts: 1,232
"La péninsule ontarienne" is a common expression in French. Québec's first botanist, le Frère Marie-Victorin, used it in his famous work, "La flore laurentienne", 1935 (The Laurentian Flora, free translation). Also, in the 1700s, the whole exploration and colonization of the Pays-d'en-Haut gave rise to the expression "Péninsule ontarienne", as this area served as a base camp for the explorers and their First Nations allies (see the memoirs of La Vérendrye, for instance). Today, it's still quite commonly used, for example, in weather reports. It usually describes the area located between the laurentian piedmont (understand : the Gananoque-Kawartha-Midland diagonal) and lakes Huron, Erie and Ontario.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2018, 6:29 PM
rousseau's Avatar
rousseau rousseau is offline
Registered Drug User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 8,119
I've never heard the term "Ontario Peninsula" before, but the Niagara Peninsula is fairly well known.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niagara_Peninsula
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2018, 6:33 PM
lio45 lio45 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 42,128
As Laceoflight says, it's not uncommon here for it to be called that. It's got water on three sides, so, yeah.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2018, 7:38 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capsicum View Post
Both regions have their Canadian side feel much "newer", whether it's infrastructure, density, culture, demographics etc. Even though Seattle is still a new city by American standards, it feels like Vancouver feels more "21st century", while Seattle is more similar to what it was like one generation ago, in the 80s.
What on earth? If you swapped Vancouver for Portland I'd agree but Seattle is a much more impressive, built up city than Vancouver IMO. It's a real big city, Vancouver is a wannabe with small town infrastructure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:55 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.