HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2017, 4:50 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Its honestly disturbing that people with this mindset exist. What happened to traditional family values? Oh wait the atomic family is evil
Really? You think that endless growth is a realistic option and that resources and geography are infinite? If our population growth doesn't slow on its own then at some point reality is going to step in and do it for us. Not in our lifetimes, of course, but do you really want to advocate for a world where our children, grandchildren or further descendants might face those kinds of existential threats? The word "evil" might be used by some to describe such an attitude.

I'm not advocating that we force anyone to do something they don't want. Reduction in population growth is a pretty standard feature of societies that have achieved a high standard of living. Canada's population would be falling if it weren't for our generous immigration policies.

My point is that as this kind of change spreads across the world of its own accord growth will naturally slow. Our economic systems aren't designed for that change - so it's going to come as a shock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2017, 6:37 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Its honestly disturbing that people with this mindset exist. What happened to traditional family values? Oh wait the atomic family is evil
Come now, if David Suzuki supports massive depopulation, how can it be wrong?
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2017, 7:05 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,274
this is horribly off-topic, but since we are talking about it. of course depopulation is necessary. this planet cant sustain 7+ billion people. realistically only ~4 billion is fully sustainable. but when you look at population growth, most is in 3rd world countries when you don't count for foreign immigration into 1st world countries from 2nd, and 3rd world countries.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 2:04 AM
Trainguy Trainguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
People don't do pleasure trips during rush hour, that's completely crazy.
Well I think they do. It is the only explanation for the increase on Hwy #1. The Pattullo is just as jammed as before. The Lougheed traffic hasn't changed. Transit riders didn't instantly decide to drive to work. The 555 is just as packed. It is mostly people going for a ride on the free bridge, not going to work. It is busy all day long now, well after the morning go-to-work-rush.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 2:30 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainguy View Post
Well I think they do. It is the only explanation for the increase on Hwy #1.
No it's not. You need to read up on induced demand.

Anyone who has seen lineups when some company offers a free giveaway intuitively understands the concept of induced demand. Most of the people in those lineups wouldn't pay for the product, or at least they sure as heck wouldn't be standing in a lineup like that to pay the regular price for it.

Roads without tolls are the traffic equivalent of a "free giveaway".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 3:00 AM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainguy View Post
Well I think they do. It is the only explanation for the increase on Hwy #1. The Pattullo is just as jammed as before. The Lougheed traffic hasn't changed. Transit riders didn't instantly decide to drive to work. The 555 is just as packed. It is mostly people going for a ride on the free bridge, not going to work. It is busy all day long now, well after the morning go-to-work-rush.
The other thought on the increased number of vehicles crossing the port mann. Is that now there are less people care pooling thus more single occupancy vehicles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 3:54 AM
logicbomb logicbomb is online now
Joshua B.
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabotp View Post
The other thought on the increased number of vehicles crossing the port mann. Is that now there are less people care pooling thus more single occupancy vehicles.
Few points:

-There was incentive to carpool but no more
-SFU has reported a surge of motorists. Parking lots are jam packed even until the later afternoon. Students SOF are driving.
-North Shore has seen a massive surge of traffic-especially on sunny days as the instagram crowd flock to the popular spot
-Spots like Buntzen Lake saw parking lots reach capacity at 7am the first week of Sept which is unheard of
-Too many affluent immigrants do not believe on carsharing or carpooling. It is stigmatized as being poorer or lesser...my friends family will all drive seprate vehicles even if they are going to the same function.This is problematic as many are trying to settle in Guildford and Langley
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 5:33 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainguy View Post
The Pattullo is just as jammed as before.
Actually traffic over the Pattullo is down 11%, and anecdotally large truck traffic is substantially reduced as well. But do go on with how traffic on the Pattullo is just as bad as it was before.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 6:50 PM
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth Smooth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 906
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
Actually traffic over the Pattullo is down 11%, and anecdotally large truck traffic is substantially reduced as well. But do go on with how traffic on the Pattullo is just as bad as it was before.
It wouldn't surprise me if the traffic reduction is mainly at off-peak hours. I would assume that the majority of the people that were willing to drive the long way to save paying the toll would have done so when they knew it wouldn't significantly delay them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 8:34 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
It wouldn't surprise me if the traffic reduction is mainly at off-peak hours. I would assume that the majority of the people that were willing to drive the long way to save paying the toll would have done so when they knew it wouldn't significantly delay them.
Anecdotally traffic on Royal Avenue traffic is down during rush hour. Every day I cross Royal during rush hour and it's nowhere near as busy as it was before there the tolls came off the Port Mann.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 9:18 PM
Trainguy Trainguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 689
If people are stupid enough to slog through bumper to bumper traffic wasting gas and time, and not go a different way, then they deserve what they get.

Mobility pricing no matter how you slice it, is just another toll. I can't see the NDP taking one off and then adding another back on. Maybe they should double or triple the ICBC rates. That will take a bunch of cars off the road, especially for drivers with bad records.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 2:09 AM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainguy View Post
If people are stupid enough to slog through bumper to bumper traffic wasting gas and time, and not go a different way, then they deserve what they get.

Mobility pricing no matter how you slice it, is just another toll. I can't see the NDP taking one off and then adding another back on. Maybe they should double or triple the ICBC rates. That will take a bunch of cars off the road, especially for drivers with bad records.
If all the bridges had been tolled I'm quite certain the NDP would not have removed those tolls. They were removed because it was unfair to only toll those bridges and not toll as example the pitt river bridge. Even though all those bridges were built at roughly the same time.

An increase in ICBC rates is just another hidden cost. It doesn't make people stop to think that maybe they should not take that trip or maybe they should plan to shop closer to home.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 2:47 AM
logicbomb logicbomb is online now
Joshua B.
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabotp View Post
If all the bridges had been tolled I'm quite certain the NDP would not have removed those tolls. They were removed because it was unfair to only toll those bridges and not toll as example the pitt river bridge. Even though all those bridges were built at roughly the same time.

An increase in ICBC rates is just another hidden cost. It doesn't make people stop to think that maybe they should not take that trip or maybe they should plan to shop closer to home.
Let's be real for a second...They didn't act on an ethical dilemma but SOLELY removed tolls because it won them ridings SOF.

The end result? People are already beginning to complain about being backed up to 152nd and seeing +30min being tacked onto their commute on weekdays. Stop-and-go traffic begins at 5:45am and sometimes last through the mid-morning while it's become a complete gongshow at other periods due to all the accidents. Congestion is sometimes observed even past 8pm now.

There's more readily available land SOF. With the tolls removed, more people are increasingly being enticed to move out there. It may have seemed "unfair" but it was required to prevent unfettered growth.

Those morons should have promised to drop tolls to $1 outside of rushhour and made a more enticing monthly pass alternative...except they were too fiscally irresponsible (as usual) and clearly didn't bother to research the repercussions of ridding the tolls.

Something will have to be done within the next 5 years as I guarantee congestion will really max out by then. Either they will be forced to bring back the tolls or implement road pricing. But I have a feeling traffic/road congestion will be the hot topic in the 2021 election. Just wait, there's absolutely nothing going ahead right now...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 2:47 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabotp View Post
If all the bridges had been tolled I'm quite certain the NDP would not have removed those tolls. They were removed because it was unfair to only toll those bridges and not toll as example the pitt river bridge. Even though all those bridges were built at roughly the same time
incorrect, they removed them so they could get elected by using bad planning, bad ideas, but pandering to the people. they did the opposite of any good decision; they wanted to get elected. and even then, they still didn't beat the Liberals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 3:22 AM
Trainguy Trainguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabotp View Post
If all the bridges had been tolled I'm quite certain the NDP would not have removed those tolls. They were removed because it was unfair to only toll those bridges and not toll as example the pitt river bridge. Even though all those bridges were built at roughly the same time.

An increase in ICBC rates is just another hidden cost. It doesn't make people stop to think that maybe they should not take that trip or maybe they should plan to shop closer to home.
Increasing ICBC rates will take cars off the road because people won't be able to afford to insure them and will have to take transit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 4:19 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainguy View Post
Increasing ICBC rates will take cars off the road because people won't be able to afford to insure them and will have to take transit.
That raises an important benefit of a per-km road pricing toll: it lets the less well-off continue to use a car for the trips where it's worth to them to pay the fee, compared to a non trip-specific tax like a vehicle levy which might prevent those people from using a car altogether.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 4:53 AM
logicbomb logicbomb is online now
Joshua B.
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
That raises an important benefit of a per-km road pricing toll: it lets the less well-off continue to use a car for the trips where it's worth to them to pay the fee, compared to a non trip-specific tax like a vehicle levy which might prevent those people from using a car altogether.
1) Luxury car tax + increase insurance for more expensive cars. People will still buy high end Audi's and BMW's
2) Stop insuring high-end luxury cars
3) Force all municipalities to begin charging the hell out of parking. Force North Vancouver to add a $10 fee for all-day parking at Lynn Canyon, Capilano and Deep Cove.
4) Distance-based per-km road pricing
5) If we use a GPS-linked system- then really increase the per-km in downtown Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 4:53 AM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Come now, if David Suzuki supports massive depopulation, how can it be wrong?
Why doesn't he set a good example and remove himself from the earth to show the rest of us how its done. I hear Mars is great this time of year and is in serious need of a hypocrite up there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 5:25 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
Why doesn't he set a good example and remove himself from the earth to show the rest of us how its done. I hear Mars is great this time of year and is in serious need of a hypocrite up there.
That's called suicide, and is frowned upon by most societies. The problem isn't the existing population so much as an unsustainable birth rate, even in some first world countries; for that, we've got things like the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement.

Of course, simpler, less-radical measures such as birth control, sex ed, or a Two Child Policy would suffice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 6:07 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
they still didn't beat the Liberals.
The NDP massacred the BC Liberals in Metro Vancouver, where people are being nickel and dimed to death.

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.